Climate scientists and activists face the disturbing truths of climate change every day. How do they manage this psychologically? In-depth qualitative interviews with a small sample from these two groups suggest that scientists often take refuge in conventional understandings of scientific rationality in their attempts to defend themselves against anxieties generated by the politicisation of climate change. By contrast, activists seem more emotionally literate, building psychological support into their practice. We trace some of the dysfunctional effects of the social defences adopted by the scientific community, and demonstrate how a different approach has led to the development of what might be called ‘sustainable activism’.
ArmstrongD. and RustinM.. 2015. Social Defences Against Anxiety: Explorations in a Paradigm. London: Karnac.
2.
BraunV. and ClarkeV.. 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101. Crossref.
3.
BrockbankA. and McGillI.. 2004. The Action Learning Handbook. London: Routledge.
4.
BuchsM., HintonE. and SmithG.. 2015. “‘It helped me sort of face the end of the world”: the role of emotions for third sector climate change initiatives’. Environmental Values24(5): 621–640. Crossref.
5.
CapstickS.B., DemskiC.C., SposatoR.G., PidgeonN.F., SpenceA. and CornerA.. 2015. ‘Public perceptions of climate change in Britain following the winter 2013/2014 flooding’. Working Paper 15-01, Understanding Risk Research Group, Cardiff University.
6.
CarterC.2015. ‘Denial and despair?’ Environmental Values24(5): 577–580. Crossref.
7.
ClarkeS. and HoggettP.. 2009. Researching Beneath the Surface. London: Karnac.
8.
CooperA. and LousadaJ.. 2005. Borderline Welfare: Feeling and Fear of Feeling in Modern Welfare. London: Karnac.
9.
DianiM. and McAdamD. (eds). 2003. Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
DowntonJ. and WehrP.. 1997. The Persistent Activist: How Peace Careers Develop and Survive. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11.
GarlandC. (ed.) 1998. Understanding Trauma: a Psychoanalytic Approach. London: Karnac.
12.
GouldD.2009. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP's Fight Against AIDS. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Crossref.
13.
HeadL.2016. Hope and Grief in the Anthropocene. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
HochschildA.1979. ‘Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure’. American Journal of Sociology85(3): 551–575. Crossref.
15.
HochschildA.1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
HoggettP., MayoM. and MillerC.. 2009. The Dilemmas of Development Work. Bristol: Policy Press.
17.
HollwayW. and JeffersonT.. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research Differently. London: Sage.
Knorr-CetinaK.1995. ‘Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science’. In JasanoffS., MarkleG., PetersonJ. and PinchT. (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 140–166. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
KuhnT.S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
LertzmanR.2015. Environmental Melancholia: Psychoanalytic Dimensions of Engagement. London: Routledge.
23.
LorenzoniI., Nicholson-ColeS. and WhitmarshL.. 2007. ‘Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications’. Global Environmental Change17: 445–459. Crossref.
24.
LutharS., CicchettiD. and BeckerB.. 2000. ‘The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work’. Child Development71(3): 543–562. Crossref.
25.
Menzies-LythI.1960. ‘A case study in the functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety’. Human Relations13(2): 95–121. Crossref.
26.
MertonR.1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
MoserS. and DillingL.. 2007. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
28.
MulkayM.1991. Sociology of Science: A Sociological Pilgrimage. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29.
NorgaardK.M.2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref.
30.
Ramírez-i-OlléM.2015. ‘Rhetorical strategies for scientific authority: a boundary-work analysis of Climategate’. Science as Culture24(4): 384–411. Crossref.
31.
RandallR.2009. ‘Loss and climate change: the cost of parallel narratives’. Ecopsychology1(3): 118–129. Crossref.
32.
RapleyC.2014. ‘Time for change? Climate science reconsidered: the report of the UCL Policy Commission on Communicating Climate Science’. London: University College London.
