Drawing on the recognition that questions of discourse and power are vital components in analysing the public participation in environmental governance, this paper examines the ways in which dominant scientific discourses about the Earth's climate inform the types of public talk facilitated in and by mini-publics, particularly when they are ‘scaled up’ to address environmental issues such as climate change. World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWViews) serves as a case study. Conceived and organised by the Danish Board of Technology, WWViews was a historically unprecedented public forum in which participants, invited from a range of nations, were given the opportunity to deliberate on key themes addressed in the negotiations taking place during the United Nations Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen (COP 15). The overarching purpose of this analysis is to invite reflection on the practices and assumptions that serve to make up publics in relation to issues that have been framed, predominantly, as scientific, universal and global.
Adger, NeilW., BarnettJ., ChapinF.S. and EllemorH.. 2011. ‘This must be the place: Underrepresentation of identity and meaning in climate change decision-making’. Global Environmental Politics11: 1–25. CrossRef.
2.
AggerA., JelsoeE., JoegerB. and PhillipsL.. 2012. ‘The creation of a global voice for citizens: The case of Denmark’. In RaskM., WorthingtonR., and LammiM. (eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 45–69. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.
3.
AnderssonE. and ShahrokhT.. 2012. ‘Crossing boundaries with deliberation: but where are we going?’ In RaskM., WorthingtonR., and LammiM. (eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 70–88. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.
4.
BaberW. and BarlettR.. 2005. Deliberative Environmental Politics and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BäckstrandK, and LövbrandE.. 2007. ‘Climate governance beyond 2012. Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernization and civic environ-mentalism’. In PettengerM., (ed.) The Social Construction of Climate Change, pp. 123–148. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
6.
BarkerD.C.2005. ‘Values, frames, and persuasion in presidential nomination campaigns’. Political Behavior27(4): 375–394. CrossRef.
7.
BedstedB., GramS., KlüverL.. 2012. ‘The story of WWViews’. In RaskM., WorthingtonR., and LammiM. (eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 30–44. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.
8.
BedstedB. and KlüverL.. 2009. WWViews on Global Warming: From the World's Citizens to the Climate Policy-Makers. Policy Report. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Technology.
9.
BodanskyD.2001. ‘The history of the global climate regime’. In LuterbacherU. and SprinzD. (eds), International Relations and Global Climate Change, pp. 23–40. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BodanskyD.2011. ‘A tale of two architectures: the once and future UN climate change regime’. Arizona State Law Journal43: 697–712.
11.
BohmanJ.2007. Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
12.
BoykoffM. and BoykoffJ.. 2004. ‘Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press’. Global Environmental Change14: 125–36. CrossRef.
13.
CalhounC.2011. ‘Civil society and the public sphere’. In EdwardsM., (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society, pp. 311–323. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
14.
CalvertA. and WarrenM.. 2013. ‘Deliberative democracy and framing effects: Why frames are a problem and how deliberative mini-publics might overcome them’. In GrönlundK., BächtigerA., and SetäläM. (eds), Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, pp. 203–223. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
DryzekJ.2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
16.
DryzekJ. and StevensonH.. 2011. ‘Global democracy and earth system governance: Ecological economics’. Ecological Economics70(11): 1865–1874. CrossRef.
17.
DryzekJ., BächtigerA., and MilewiczA.. 2011. ‘Toward a deliberative global citizen's assembly’. Global Policy2: 33–42. CrossRef.
18.
EinsiedelE., JelsøeE. and BreckT.. 2001. ‘Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia’. Public Understanding of Science10: 83–98. CrossRef.
19.
FishkinJ.2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FishkinJ. and LuskinR.C.. 2005. ‘Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion’. Acta Politica40: 284–298. CrossRef.
21.
FogelC.2004. ‘The local, the global and the Kyoto Protocol’. In JasanoffS. and MartelloM. (eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, pp. 103–126. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
22.
FungA.2003. ‘Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences.’ Journal of Political Philosophy11: 338–67. CrossRef.
23.
HulmeM.2008. ‘Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33: 5–11. CrossRef.
24.
HulmeM.2010. ‘Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge’. Global Environmental Change20: 558–564. CrossRef.
25.
IrwinA.2006. ‘The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance’. Social Studies of Science36: 299–320. CrossRef.
26.
IrwinA., JensenT. and JonesK.. 2013. ‘The good, the bad, and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice’. Social Studies of Science43: 118–135. CrossRef.
27.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC].2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policy Makers. Geneva: World Meteorological Organisation.
28.
JasanoffS.1999. ‘The songlines of risk’. Environmental Values8: 135–152. CrossRef.
29.
JasanoffS.2007. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
JasanoffS.2010. ‘A new climate for society’. Theory, Culture and Society27: 233–253. CrossRef.
31.
LahsenM.2004 ‘Transnsational locals: Brazilian experiences of the climate regime’. In JasanoffS. and MartelloM. (eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, pp. 151–172. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
32.
LezaunJ. and SonerydL.. 2007. ‘Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics’. Public Understanding of Science16: 279–297. CrossRef.
33.
LivingstonD.2003. Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef.
34.
LomborgB.2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Translated by MatthewH.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
35.
MartelloM. and JasanoffS.. 2004. ‘Globalization and environmental governance’. In JasanoffS. and MartelloM. (eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, pp. 1–30. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
36.
MillerC.2004. ‘Climate science and the making of a global political order’. In JasanoffS. (ed), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, pp. 46–66. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
RaskM. and WorthingtonR.. 2012. ‘Towards a new concept of global governance’. In RaskM., WorthingtonR. and LammiM. (eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. pp. 3–29. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.
38.
RaynerS.2007. ‘The rise of risk and the decline of politics’. Environmental Hazards7: 165–172. CrossRef.
39.
RiedyC and HerrimanJ.. 2011. ‘Deliberative mini-publics and the Global Deliberative System: Insights from an evaluation of World Wide Views on Global Warming in Australia’. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies8(3): 2–29. CrossRef.
40.
ScottJ.1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. Princeton, NJ: Yale University Press.
41.
SmithG.2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London and New York, NY: Routledge. CrossRef.
42.
SønderriisE., KlüverL., BedstedB., GramS., and LeisnerI.. 2009. WWViews Information Booklet. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Technology.
43.
StevensonH. and DryzekJ.. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
44.
StirlingA.2008. “‘Opening up” and “closing down”: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology’. Science, Technology & Human Values33: 262–294. CrossRef.
45.
SwyngedouwE.2007. ‘Impossible/undesirable sustainability and the post-political condition’. In KruegerJ. R. and GibbsD. (eds), The Sustainable Development Paradox. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
UNFCCC.1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.United Nations.
47.
VisvanathanS.2005. ‘Knowledge, justice and democracy’. In LeachM., ScoonesI. and WynneB. (eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, pp. 83–94. London: Zed Books.
48.
WorthingtonR, RaskM. and JaegerB.. 2012. ‘Deliberative global governance: Next steps in an emerging practice’. In RaskM., WorthingtonR., and LammiM. (eds) Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 263–286. London and New York: Earthscan.
49.
WynneB.2005. ‘Risk as globalizing “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens’. In LeachM., ScoonesI. and WynneB. (eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, pp. 66–82. London: Zed Books.
50.
WynneB.2007. ‘Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake’. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal1: 99–110.
