The primary method for defending biocentric individualism – a prominent theory of the moral value of organisms – is to appeal to the fact that there are certain things that are good for and bad for living creatures, even if they are not sentient. This defence is typically and frequently met with the objection that we can determine what is good for some living creature without thereby having any moral reason or obligation to promote or avoid undermining it. In this paper I show how a theory of the morality of defensive violence pre-empts this objection.
CallicotJ.B.2013. Thinking Like a Planet: The Land Ethic and the Earth Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
FeinbergJ.1974. ‘The rights of animals and unborn generations’. In BlackstoneW.T., (ed.) Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, pp. 43–68. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
10.
FeinbergJ.1984. Harm to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
FisherJ.M.2011. Our Stories: Essays on Life, Death, and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
HargroveE.2003. ‘Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value’. In LightA. and RolstonH.III (eds), Environmental Ethics, pp. 175–190. New York, NY: Blackwell.
13.
HuemerM.2008. ‘In defence of repugnance’. Mind117: 899–933. Crossref.
14.
KaganS.2012. Death. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
KaufmanW.2010. ‘Self-defense, innocent aggressors, and the duty of martyrdom’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly91: 78–96. Crossref.
16.
KrautR.2011. Against Absolute Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
LeopoldA.1949. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
McMahanJ.2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
19.
McMahanJ.2009. Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
20.
MooreG.E.1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
NagelT.1979. ‘Death’. In NagelT., Mortal Questions, pp. 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
NorcrossA.2005. ‘Harming in context’. Philosophical Studies123(1/2): 149–173. Crossref.
23.
O'NeillJ.2009. ‘The varieties of intrinsic value’. In ClowneyD. and MostoP. (eds), Earthcare: An Anthology in Environmental Ethics, pp. 144–158. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
O'NeillJ., HollandA. and LightA.. 2008. Environmental Values. London: Blackwell.
25.
ParfitD.1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26.
RolstonH.III2012. A New Environmental Ethics: The Next Millennium for Life on Earth. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
SingerP.2009. ‘Speciesism and moral status’. Metaphilosophy40: 567–581. Crossref.
28.
TaylorP.1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
VarnerG.1998. In Nature's Interests? Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Von WrightG.H.1963. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge.
