In environmental ethics, the legal and political representation of non-humans is a widespread aspiration. Its supporters see representative institutions that give voice to non-humans’ interests as a promising strategy for responding to the illegitimate worldwide exploitation of non-human beings. In this article I engage critically with those who support this form of representation, and address two issues central to any account concerned with the legal and political representation of non-human living beings: what should be represented? And what are the conditions of such a representation? The answers I provide to these queries count as a first step towards a comprehensive account of the institutional representation of non-human nature.
AttfieldR.1983. The Ethics of Environmental Concern. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
2.
BeitzC.1990. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BrighouseH. and FleurbaeyM.. 2010. ‘Democracy and Proportionality’. Journal of Political Philosophy18(2): 137–155. Crossref.
4.
BurkeE.1829 [1774]. ‘Speech to the Electors of Bristol’. The American Quarterly Review5(9): 41–50.
5.
ColvinE.1990. ‘Exculpatory defenses in criminal law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies10(3): 381–407. Crossref.
6.
ConniffJ.1994. The Useful Cobbler: Edmund Burke and the Politics of Progress. New York, NY: State University of New York.
7.
DahlR.1979. ‘Procedural democracy’. In LaslettP. and FishkinJ. (eds), Philosophy, Politics and Society: Fifth Series, pp. 97–133. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
DobsonA.1996. ‘Representative democracy and the environment’. In LaffertyW. and MeadowcraftJ. (eds), Democracy and the Environment, pp. 124–139. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9.
DonaldsonS. and KymlickaW.. 2013. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
DretzkeF.1995. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
DryzekJ. and ListC.. 2003. ‘Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation’. British Journal of Political Science33(1): 1–28. Crossref.
12.
DuffA.2007. Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
13.
DustinW.2000. Toward an Ethic of Citizenship: Creating a Culture of Democracy for the 21stCentury. New York, NY: toExcel Press.
14.
EckersleyR.1998. ‘Beyond human racism’. Environmental Values7(2): 165–182. Crossref.
15.
EckersleyR.1999. ‘The discourse ethic and the problem of representing nature’. Environmental Politics8(2): 24–49. Crossref.
16.
EckersleyR.2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
EstlundD.2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
FeinbergJ.1974. ‘The rights of animals and unborn generations’. In BlackstoneW., (ed.) Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, pp. 43–68. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. Crossref.
19.
FeinbergJ.1987. Harm to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FletcherG.1978. Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
21.
GardnerJ.2007. Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
22.
GarnerR.2013. A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
23.
GoodinR.2007. ‘Enfranchising all affected interests and its alternatives’. Philosophy and Public Affairs35: 40–68. Crossref.
24.
GoodinR.1996. ‘Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives’. Political Studies44: 835–849. Crossref.
25.
GoodinR.2000. ‘Democratic deliberation within’. Philosophy and Public Affairs29(1): 81–109. Crossref.
26.
GoodpasterK.1978. ‘On being morally considerable’. Journal of Philosophy75: 308–325. Crossref.
27.
HeldD.1995. Democracy and the Global Order. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
NeanderK.1991. ‘The teleological notion of “function”’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy69(4): 454–468. Crossref.
29.
PitkinH.1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
RolstonH.III2001. ‘Enforcing environmental ethics – civic law and natural value’. In SterbaJ., (ed.) Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 349–369. London: Routledge.
31.
SaundersB.2011. ‘Defining the demos’. Politics, Philosophy and Economics11(3): 280–301. Crossref.
32.
SchweitzerA.1923. Civilization and Ethics, trans. by NaishJ.. London: A. and C. Black.
33.
SteinT.1998. ‘Does the constitutional and democratic system work? the ecological crisis as a challenge to the political order of constitutional democracy’. Constellations4(3): 420–449. Crossref.
SterbaJ.2005. ‘Global justice for humans or for all living beings and what difference it makes’. The Journal of Ethics9: 283–300. Crossref.
36.
StoneC.1974. Should Trees Have Standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, CA: Kaufman.
37.
SylvanR.1973. ‘Is there a need for a new, an environmental, ethic?’ Proceeding of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, pp. 205–210. Varna: Sofia Press.
38.
TaylorP.1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
VarnerG.1998. In Nature's Interests? Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
