Local perceptions of protected areas are important for conservation and the sustainability of protected areas. We undertook qualitative and ethnographic fieldwork to explore relationships between people and protected areas in the Blouberg mountain range, South Africa. The history of land use and current relationships with protected areas reveal legacies of marginalisation and immiseration, giving credence to a theory of traumatic nature. The impacts of traumatic nature manifest themselves in local discourses and narratives of nature, protected areas and conservation.
AnthonyB.P. and SzaboA.. 2011. ‘Protected areas: Conservation cornerstones or paradoxes? Insights from human–wildlife conflicts in Africa and Southeastern Europe’. In Lopez-PujolJ., (ed.) The Importance of Biological Interactions in the Study of Biodiversity, pp. 255–282. Croatia: InTech.
BerkesF.2009. ‘Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning’. Journal of Environmental Management90: 1692–1702. Crossref.
4.
BLM (Blouberg Local Municipality).2007/8. ‘Integrated Development Plan’. Blouberg: Blouberg Local Municipality.
5.
BLM (Blouberg Local Municipality).2013–2016. ‘Integrated Development Plan’. Blouberg: Blouberg Local Municipality.
6.
CampbellB.2000. ‘Animals behaving badly’. In KnightJ., (ed.) Natural Enemies: People–Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective, pp. 124–144. London: Routledge.
7.
ConstantN.2014. ‘A socio-ecological approach towards understanding conflict between leopards (Panthera pardus) and humans in South Africa: Implications for leopard conservation and farming livelihoods’, PhD thesis. Durham: Durham University.
8.
ConstantN.L., BellS. and HillR.A.. 2015. ‘The impacts, characterisation and management of human–leopard conflict in a multi-use land system in South Africa’. Biodiversity and Conservation24: 2967–2989. Crossref.
9.
DahalS., NepalS.K. and SchuettM.A.. 2014. ‘Examining marginalized communities and local conservation institutions: The case of Nepal's Annapurna Conservation Area’. Environmental Management53: 219–230. Crossref.
10.
DudleyN. (ed.). 2008. ‘Guidelines for applying protected area management categories’. Gland: IUCN.
11.
EmersonR.M., FretzR.I. and ShawL.L.. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
FabriciusC. and de WetC.. 2002. ‘The influence of forced removals and land restitution on conservation in South Africa’. In ChattyD. and ColchesterM. (eds), Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples: Displacement, Forced Settlement and Sustainable Development, pp. 142–157. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
13.
FabriciusC., KochE., MagomeH. and TurnerS.. 2004. ‘The fundamentals of community-based natural resource management’. In FabriciusC. and KochE. (eds), Rights, Resources and Rural Development: Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa, pp. 3–43. London: Earthscan.
14.
GhimireK.B. and PimbertM.P.. 1997. ‘Social change and conservation: An overview of issues and concepts’. In GhimireK.B. and PimbertM.P. (eds), Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas, pp. 1–45. London: Earthscan Publications.
15.
Hirschnitz-GarbersM. and Stoll-KleemanS.. 2011. ‘Opportunities and barriers in the implementation of protected area management: A qualitative meta-analysis of case studies from European protected areas’. Geographical Journal177: 321–334. Crossref.
16.
JoubertA.2004. The Power of Performance: Linking Past and Present in Hananwa and Lobedu Oral Literature. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17.
JoubertA.P., and van SchalkwykJ.A.. 1999. ‘War and rememberance: The power of oral poetry and the politics of Hananwa identity’. Journal of Southern African Studies25: 29–47. Crossref.
18.
KhanF.1990. ‘Contemporary South African environmental response: An historical and socio-political evaluation, with particular reference to Blacks’, MA thesis. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
19.
KrielL.2004. ‘Negotiating identity in contested space: African Christians, white missionaries and the Boer conquest of the Blouberg in late nineteenth-century Transvaal’. African Historical Review36: 148–169. Crossref.
20.
LabandJ.2005. The Transvaal Rebellion: The First Boer War, 1880–1881. London: Longman.
21.
LPG (Limpopo Provincial Government). 2004. ‘Blouberg Nature Reserve management plan’. Polokwane: Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism.
22.
MakhuraT.J.1993. ‘The Bagananwa polity in the north-western Transvaal and the South African Republic, c. 1836–1896’, MA thesis. Mahikeng: University of Bophuthatswana.
23.
MurphreeM.W.2002. ‘Protected areas and the commons’. Common Property Resource Digest60: 1–3.
24.
NCCG (NCC Group).2012a. ‘Five-year strategic plan for the Blouberg Nature Reserve, Limpopo Province, South Africa’. Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism. Available at: www.ncc-group.co.za/sites/default/files/u66/Blouberg%20SP.pdf (accessed 25 January 2017).
25.
NCCG (NCC Group).2012b. ‘Five-year strategic plan for the Maleboch Nature Reserve, Limpopo, South Africa’. Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism. Available at: http://www.ncc-group.co.za/sites/default/files/u66/Maleboch%20SP.pdf (accessed 25 January 2017).
26.
O'NeillJ., HollandA. and LightA.. 2008. Environmental Values. London: Routledge.
27.
PatersonA.R.2010. ‘Legal framework for protected areas: South Africa’. Gland: IUCN.
28.
PhillipsA.2003. ‘Turning ideas on their head: The new paradigm for protected areas’. George Wright Forum20(2): 8–32.
29.
RedpathS.M., YoungJ., EvelyA., AdamsW.M., SutherlandW.J., WhitehouseA., AmarA., LambertR.A., LinnellJ.D.C. and WattA.. 2013. ‘Understanding and managing conservation conflicts’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution28: 100–109. Crossref.
30.
RSA (Republic of South Africa).2011. ‘Water services information reference framework’. Pretoria: Directorate Water Services Macro Planning and Information Systems, Department of Water Affairs.
31.
SchalkwykJ.A. and SmithB.W.. 2004. ‘Insiders and outsiders: Sources for reinterpreting a historical event’. In ReidA.M. and LaneP.J. (eds), African Historical Archaeologies, pp. 325–346. New York: Kluwer.
32.
SebolaM.P.2004. ‘Attaining community prosperity through local economic development: Maleboho Nature Reserve’, PhD thesis. Pretoria: Tshwane University of Technology.
33.
SmelserN.J.2004. ‘Psychological trauma and cultural trauma’. In AlexanderJ.C, EyermanR., GiesenB., SmelserN.J. and SztompkaP., Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, pp. 31–59. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
SonntagC.1983. My Friend Maleboch, Chief of the Blue Mountains: An Eye-Witness Account of the Maleboch War of 1894 from the Diary of Christoph Sonntag. Pretoria: K.C.G. Sonntag.
35.
Stoll-KleemannS.2001. ‘Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas’. Journal of Environmental Psychology21: 369–385. Crossref.
36.
SumaresD. and FidelisT.. 2011. ‘Natura 2000 and the narrative nature of nature: A case for critical discourse analysis’. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences8: 53–68. Crossref.
37.
SztompkaP.2004. ‘The trauma of social change’. In AlexanderJ.C, EyermanR., GiesenB., SmelserN.J. and SztompkaP., Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, pp. 155–195. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Van AsscheK., BellS. and TeampauP.. 2012. ‘Traumatic natures of the swamp: Concepts of nature in the Romanian Danube delta’. Environmental Values21: 163–183. Crossref.
39.
WestP., IgoeJ. and BrockingtonD.. 2006. ‘Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas’. Annual Review of Anthropology35: 251–277. Crossref.
40.
WildR. and McLeodC.. 2008. ‘Sacred natural sites: Guidelines for protected area managers’. Gland: IUCN.
41.
WordenN.2007. ‘New approaches to VOC history in South Africa’. South African Historical Journal59: 3–18. Crossref.
