This paper focuses on local constructions of ‘nature’ in governance processes, and the importance of historical and institutional contexts for their genesis and functioning. Through extensive field study in the Romanian Danube Delta, it is demonstrated that the origin and distribution of certain concepts can be credited to a history of conflicts over land and resource use. Considering the implications for participatory natural resource governance, we argue that this capacity of the governance context to produce and transform concepts of nature, poses real challenges. To these challenges can be added legacies of disempowerment and marginalisation, evident in local inhabitants’ images and concepts of nature, which we seek to understand by developing a theory of traumatic nature.
BalM.2002. Travelling Concepts, New Haven: Yale University Press.
5.
BelacurencuT.2007. ‘Implementation of ecological policies in the Danube Delta’, Theoretical and Applied Economics4(4): 9–27.
6.
BellS. (ed.) 2004. IMEW Integrated Management of European Wetlands. Final Report.Durham: Durham University.
7.
BellS., NichersuI.. 2001. ‘Conservation versus livelihood in the Danube Delta’, Anthropology of East Europe Review19(1).
8.
BellS. and ReinertH.2009. ‘On the outside looking in: Biodiversity and the algebra of life’, in MESS and RAMSES II, Mediterranean Ethnological Summer School, 7, pp. 327–342. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana Press.
9.
BojaV. and PopescuI.2000. ‘Social ecology in the Danube Delta: theory and practice’. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management5(2): 125–131.
10.
BuijsA.2009. ‘Lay people's images of nature: comprehensive frameworks of values, beliefs and value orientations’. Society and Natural Resources22: 417–432.
11.
DDBRA, 2000. Public Participation and Commnunication Strategy.Tulcea, Romania: DDBRA.
12.
DeJongJ. and SchultzB.1982. ‘Deontwikkeling van de Donau Delta’, Culturtechnisch tijdschrift22(2): 43–56.
13.
DescolaPh. and PalssonG. (eds.) 1996. Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives.London: Routledge.
14.
DescolaPh. 2005. Par de- la nature et culture.Paris: Gallimard.
15.
DumitrescuA.2005. ‘Implementation of social assistant system in the Danube Delta localities’. Scientific annals of the Danube Delta Institute11: 35–46.
16.
EastW.1932. ‘The Danube Route-way in history’. Economica37: 321–345.
17.
EcoU.1976. A Theory of Semiotics.Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
18.
EllenR. and FukuiK. (eds.) 1996. Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication.Oxford: Berg.
FischerF.2000. Citizens, Experts and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge.Durham: Duke University Press.
21.
FlyvbjergB.1998. Rationality and Power.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FoucaultM.1968. Les mots et les choses.Paris, Gallimard.
23.
FoucaultM.1975. Surveiller et punir.Paris, Gallimard.
24.
GalatchiL.2009. ‘Environmental management of intentional or accidental environmental threats to water security in the Danube Delta’, in JonesJ., VardanianT. and HakopianC. (eds.), Threats to Global Water Security, pp. 305–315. Dordrecht: Springer.
25.
GarnettM. (n.d.). Preliminary Solutions for the Coexistence of Fisheries and Pelicans in the Danube Delta. Preliminary Report IUCN/WWF Project No. 3139.
GastescuP.1996. ‘The Danube delta biosphere reserve: Present state and management’. Revue Roumaine de Geographie40: 27–33.
28.
GirardR.1989. The Scapegoat.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
GlackenC.J.1967. Traces on the Rhodian Shore. Nature and Culture in Western Thought from the Ancient World to the End of the Eighteenth Century.Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
GoriupP.1994. ‘Biodiversity ecological investment and sustainable development in the Danube delta biosphere reserve, Romania’. Ecos14: 45–51.
31.
GreenR.1990. The Ornithological Importance of the Danube Delta and Lake Razelm-Sinoie. Draft prepared for international mission 1990.
32.
GrimmettR. and JonesT.1989. Important Bird Areas in Europe.Cambridge: International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP).
33.
GunderM. and HillierJ.2009. Planning in Ten Words or Less. A Lacanian Entanglement with Planning.Aldershot: Ashgate.
34.
HajerM. and WagenaarM.2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Governance in the Network Society.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HillierJ.2002. Shadows of Power.London: Routledge.
36.
HallD.1993. ‘Eco tourism in the Danube Delta’. Tourism Review48(3): 11–13.
37.
IngoldT.2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Dwelling, Livelihood and Skill. London: Routledge.
38.
IordachiC.2002. Citizenship, Nation and State-Building: The Integration of Northern Dobrogea in Romania, 1878–1913.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
39.
IUCN1986. MAB Information System Biosphere Reserves Compilation October 1986. Prepared for UNESCO.Gland: IUCN.
IUCN (PonsL., ed.) 1992. The Danube Delta. Conservation Status Report.Gland: IUCN.
42.
KepeT.1997. ‘Communities, entitlements and nature reserves: the case of the wild coast, South Africa’. IDS Bulletin, 1–13.
43.
KeulartzJ., Van der WindtH. and SwartJ.2004. ‘Concepts of nature as communicative devices: The case of Dutch nature policy’, Environmental Values13(1):81–99.
44.
Knight2000. Natural Enemies. People-Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective.London: Routledge.
45.
LangeveldM. and GrimmettR. (eds.) 1990. Important Bird Areas in Europe. Wetlands for the Shadow List of Ramsar Sites.Cambridge: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau.
46.
LatourN.2004. The Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy?, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47.
Mannigel2008. ‘Integrating parks and people: how does participation work in protected area management?’ Society and Natural Resources21(6): 498–511.
48.
MarinG. and SchneiderE.1997. Ecological Restoration in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Romania.Tulcea: DDBRA/WWF.
49.
NavodaruI. and StarasM.1998. ‘Conservation of fish stocks in the Danube Delta, Romania: Present status, constraints, and recommendation’. Italian Journal for Zoology65(1): 369–371.
50.
NavodaruI., StarasM. and CernisencuI.2001. ‘The challenge of sustainable use of the Danube Delta Fisheries, Romania’. Fisheries Management and Ecology8(4–5): 323–332.
51.
NelsonV.2005. ‘Representation and images of people, place and nature in Grenada's tourism’. Geografiska Annaler B87(2): 131–143.
52.
O'RiordanT.2002. ‘Protecting beyond the protected’, in O'RiordanT., Stoll-KleemannS. (eds.), Biodiversity, Human Livelihoods and Sustainability, pp. 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
O'RiordanT. and Stoll-KleemannS. (eds.) 2002. Biodiversity, Human Livelihoods and Sustainability.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
OstromE.1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PanighiantE.1972. Le Delta du Danube.Bucharest: Editions Touristiques.
56.
PellizzoniL.2003. ‘Uncertainty and participatory democracy’, Environmental Values, 12: 195–224.
57.
PonsL.1987. Recent Information about the Present Ecological State of the Danube Delta and Future Threats by Agricultural Developments. Report (n.p.).
58.
PonsL.1988. A Visit to the Danube Delta (19th–22nd October 1988). Report (n.p.).
59.
PonsL. and Pons-GhitulescuM.1990. The Recent Developments Around the Danube. Report (n.p.).
60.
SchiemerF.2006. ‘Ecological status and problems of the Danube and its fish fauna’. Proceedings of the 36th IAD Conference.Vienna: IAD.
61.
SchneiderE.1990. ‘Die auen im einzugsgebiet der unteren Donau’. Arbeit des internationals Auen symposium 1987 beim WWF Auen Institut Rastatt.Laufen: ANL.
62.
ScottJ.1998. Seeing Like a State.New Haven: Yale University Press.
63.
SouléM. and LeaseG.1995. Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction.Washington: Island Press.
64.
StiucaR. and NichersuI.2006. ‘Master Plan – support for sustainable development in Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve/Tulcea county (Romania) Logical Framework Analysis (LFA). Proceedings of the 36th IAD conference.Vienna: IAD.
65.
StringerL, DougillA., FraserE., HubacekK., PrellC. and ReedM.2006. ‘Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review’. Ecology and Society11(2).
66.
StringerL, ScrieciuS. and ReedM.2009. ‘Biodiversity, land degradation, and climate change: participatory planning in Romania’. Applied Geography29(1): 77–90.
67.
TeampauP. and Van AsscheK.2009. ‘Sulina, Sulina, when there's water, there's no light. Memory and autobiography in a Romanian town’. Identities7(1–2): 33–70.
68.
TurnhoutE.2004. ‘The role of views of nature in Dutch nature conservation: The case of the creation of a drift sand area in the Hoge Veluwe National Park’. Environmental Values13(2): 187–198.
69.
TurnockD.1986. The Romanian Economy in the 20thCentury, New York: St Martin's Press.
Van AsscheK.2001. Images of Nature and Urbanization. Report for the Dutch Ministry of Environment and Agriculture (report for ‘Natuurverkenningen 2002’; in Dutch).
73.
Van AsscheK.2004. Signs in Time. An Interpretive Account of Urban Planning and Design, the People and their Histories.Wageningen: Wageningen University.
74.
Van AsscheK. and TeampauP.2009. ‘Layered encounters. Performance of multiculturalism and urban palimpsest at the “gateway of Europe”’. Anthropology of East Europe Review27(1): 7–19.
75.
Van AsscheK., TeampauP., DevliegerP. and SuciuC.2008. ‘Liquid boundaries in marginal marshes. Reconstructions of identity in the Danube Delta’, Studia Sociologia24(3): 110–129.
76.
Van AsscheK., DevliegerP., TeampauP. and VerschraegenG.2009. ‘Forgetting and remembering in the margin. Constructing past and future in the Romanian Danube Delta’. Memory Studies2(2): 211–234.
77.
WalpoleM. and Leader-WilliamsN.2002. ‘Tourism and flagship species in conservation’. Biodiversity and Conservation11: 543–547.
78.
WestP.2006. Conservation is Our Government Now: the Politics of Ecology in Papua New Guinea.Durham: Duke University Press.
79.
World Bank1994. Danube Delta Biodiversity Project. Project Document, Washington: World Bank.
80.
World Bank2005. Project Performance Assessment Report. Danube Delta Biodiversity Project, Washington: World Bank (nr. 32684).
81.
ZizekS.1990. The Sublime Object of Ideology.London: Verso.
