Political Ambiguity in Chinese Climate Change Discourses

Abstract

China's political environment offers limited space for critical debates on domestic politics. In such a constrained environment, people tend to represent and articulate climate change issues without explicitly addressing their political aspects. The aim of this paper is to examine this political ambiguity in climate change discourses. Q methodology was employed to elicit the subjective positions of forty-five young and educated Chinese individuals. Three discourses were extracted: namely, prosaic environmentalism, co-operative economic optimism and actor scepticism. These discourses do not indicate critical intent and deep engagement in the political arguments regarding climate change. This raises concern about the growth of climate citizenship within the country.

Keywords

Climate change political activism discourse Q methodology youth environmentalism China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addams

2000. ‘Q Methodology’. In Addams

and Proops

(eds), Social Discourse and Environmental Policy: An Application of Q Methodology. Cheltenham/ Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Beck

1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Brannstrom

2011. ‘A Q-method analysis of environmental governance discourses in Brazil's northeastern soy frontier’. The Professional Geographer 63: 531–549. CrossRef.

Brown

S.R.

1980. Political Subjectivity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Chen

and Zhong

. 1999. ‘Mass political interest (or apathy) in urban China’. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32: 281–303. CrossRef.

Davies

B.B.

and Hodge

I.D.

. 2007. ‘Exploring environmental perspectives in lowland agriculture: A Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK’. Ecological Economics 61: 323–333. CrossRef.

Davies

B.B.

and Hodge

I.D.

. 2012. ‘Shifting environmental perspectives in agriculture: Repeated Q analysis and the stability of preference structures’. Ecological Economics 83: 51–57. CrossRef.

Dryzek

J.S.

1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dryzek

J.S.

2005. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Second edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

10.

Dryzek

J.S.

and Berejikian

. 1993. ‘Reconstructive democratic theory’. American Political Science Review 87: 48–60. CrossRef.

11.

Dryzek

J.S.

, Lo

A.Y.

. 2015. ‘Reason and rhetoric in climate communication’. Environmental Politics 24: 1–16.

12.

Dryzek

J.S.

, Stevenson

. 2011. ‘Global democracy and earth system governance’. Ecological Economics 70: 1865–1874. CrossRef.

13.

The Economist. 2013. Democracy Index 2012: Democracy at a Standstill. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.

14.

Hajer

M.A.

1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Harris

P.G.

2004. “‘Getting rich is glorious”: Environmental values in the People's Republic of China’. Environmental Values 13: 145–165. CrossRef.

16.

Harris

P.G.

2006. ‘Environmental perspectives and behavior in China: Synopsis and bibliography’. Environment and Behavior 38: 5–21. CrossRef.

17.

Hobson

and Niemeyer

. 2013. “‘What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism’. Public Understanding of Science 22: 396–412. CrossRef.

18.

Hulme

2009. Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

19.

Jepson

, Brannstrom

and Persons

. 2012. “‘We Don't Take the Pledge”: Environmentality and environmental skepticism at the epicenter of US wind energy development’. Geoforum 43: 851–863. CrossRef.

20.

Lansing

D.M.

2013. ‘Not all baselines are created equal: A Q methodology analysis of stakeholder perspectives of additionality in a carbon forestry offset project in Costa Rica’. Global Environmental Change 23: 654–663. CrossRef.

21.

Leiserowitz

A.A.

2005. ‘American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?’ Risk Analysis 25: 1433–1442. CrossRef.

22.

A.Y.

2010. ‘Active conflict or passive coherence: The political economy of climate change in China’. Environmental Politics 19: 1012–1017. CrossRef.

23.

A.Y.

2013. ‘Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: Reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change’. Ecological Economics 87: 84–94. CrossRef.

24.

A.Y.

2014. ‘More or Less Pluralistic? A Typology of the Remedial and Alternative Perspectives on Monetary Valuation of the Environment’. Environmental Values 23: 253–274.

25.

A.Y.

[Forthcoming.] ‘National development and carbon trading: The symbolism of Chinese climate capitalism’. Eurasian Geography and Economics. CrossRef.

26.

A.Y.

and Howes

. 2013. ‘Powered by the state or finance? The organization of China's carbon markets’. Eurasian Geography and Economics 54: 386–408.

27.

2003. ‘Bamboo sprouts after the rain: The history of university student environmental associations in China’. China Environment Series 6: 55–65.

28.

Marquart-Pyatt

S.T.

2012. ‘Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation’. Social Science Research 41: 1085–1099. CrossRef.

29.

McCright

A.M.

and Dunlap

R.E.

. 2011a. ‘Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States’. Global Environmental Change 21: 1163–1172. CrossRef.

30.

McCright

A.M.

and Dunlap

R.E.

. 2011b. ‘The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010’. Sociological Quarterly 52: 155–194. CrossRef.

31.

McKeown

and Thomas

. 1988. Q Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

32.

Niemeyer

2004. ‘Deliberation in the Wilderness: Displacing Symbolic Politics’. Environmental Politics 13: 347–372. CrossRef.

33.

Poortinga

, Spence

, Whitmarsh

, Capstick

and Pidgeon

N.F.

. 2011. ‘Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change’. Global Environmental Change 21: 1015–1024. CrossRef.

34.

Robbins

and Krueger

. 2000. ‘Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography’. Professional Geographer 52: 636–648. CrossRef.

35.

Shi

1999. ‘Village committee elections in China: Institutionalist tactics for democracy’. World Politics 51: 385–412. CrossRef.

36.

Tang

2005. Public Opinion and Political Change in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

37.

Thompson

and Rayner

. 1998. ‘Risk and governance, Part I: the discourses of climate change’. Government and Opposition 33: 139–166. CrossRef.

38.

Wallis

2011. ‘New media practices in China: Youth Patterns, Processes, and Politics’. International Journal of Communication 5: 406–436.

39.

Washington

and Cook

. 2011. Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand. London: Earthscan.

40.

Whitmarsh

2011. ‘Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time’. Global Environmental Change 21: 690–700. CrossRef.

41.

Wong

K.K.

2003. ‘The environmental awareness of university students in Beijing, China’. Journal of Contemporary China 12: 519–536. CrossRef.

42.

Wong

K.K.

2010. ‘Environmental awareness, governance and public participation: Public perception perspectives’. International Journal of Environmental Studies 67: 169–181. CrossRef.

43.

Yang

2005. ‘Environmental NGOs and institutional dynamics in China’. The China Quarterly 181: 46–66. CrossRef.

44.

Yang

2009. The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

45.

Yang

and Calhoun

. 2007. ‘Media, civil society, and the rise of a Green public sphere in China’. China Information 21: 211–236. CrossRef.

46.

Zheng

2008. Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.