The conflicts permeating the environmental debate since the 1960s have mainly involved two actors: multinational companies and international environmental organizations (ENGOs). Today, there are signs that the antagonism is ending with regards to co-operation and strategy. We argue that this convergence is no longer limited to specific joint projects, but is also prevalent at the idea and policy levels. Both actors have begun describing problems in similar terms, articulating the same goals and recommending the same solutions. Such convergence offers advantages in efforts to counteract climate change but also some problems: declining citizen trust in ENGOs, risk of intellectually impoverished environmental and energy debates, and loss of alternate visions and values.
CAN.2008. EU Set to Fail Climate Test. Friends of the Earth. Press release 4 December 2008.
8.
CarterS.M.2006. ‘Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin: Destroying tobacco control activism from the inside’. Tobacco Control11: 112–118.
9.
de ConinckH.2008. ‘Trojan horse or horn of plenty? Reflections on allowing CCS in the CDM’. Energy Policy36: 929–936.
10.
GullbergO.2008. The Role of Business in Tomorrow's Society. Report no: SDI 18–04.
11.
van den HoveS., Le MenestrelM. and de BettigniesH-E. 2002. ‘The oil industry and climate change: strategies and ethical dilemmas’. Climate Policy2(3): 18.
LovinsA.B.1977. Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
14.
NewellP.2000. ‘Working with stakeholder pressure for sustainable development’. In BendellJ. (ed.), Terms for Endearment: Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
15.
Oxfam.2008. Business Influence Threatens EU Climate Ambitions, Says Oxfam. Oxfam International. Press release 4 December 2008.
16.
PamlinD. and PåhlmanS.. 2008a. From Risk to Profit: The ICT Sector as a Winner in a Low Carbon Economy. WWF International.
17.
PamlinD. and PåhlmanS.. 2008b. Identifying the First One Billion Tonnes of CO2Reductions Using ICT Solutions. WWF International.
18.
PulverS.2002. ‘Organizing business: industry NGOs in the climate debates’. Greener Management International39: 55–67.
19.
PulverS.2004. Power in the Public Sphere: The Battles between Oil Companies and Environmental Groups in the UN Climate Change Negotiations, 1991–2003. Berkeley, University of California.
20.
PulverS.2007. ‘Making sense of corporate environmentalism: an environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry’. Organization and Environment20: 43–83.
21.
RietbergenJ.2008. Building a Sustainable Future. WWF International, Switzerland.
22.
SchumacherE.F.1973. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.
23.
Shell, 2008a. Responsible Energy: The Shell Sustainability Report 2007. Royal Dutch Shell.
24.
Shell, 2008b. Shell Energy Scenarios to 2050. Shell International B V.
