The European Rivers Network (ERN) calls for the ‘reconciliation of citizens with their rivers and lakes’, as a necessary step for freshwater protection and restoration of rivers. It co-ordinates annual river-bathing days with collective river jumps; upstream and downstream, across Europe, citizens simultaneously jump into rivers and lakes. But what is ‘reconciliation with the river'? This paper analyses that concept as the acknowledging and restoring of distorted, marginalised or blocked capabilities, and, based on this analysis, critically discusses the practical contribution which the ERN makes to ‘reconciliation with the river’.
Abu-NimerM. (ed.) 2001. Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence. Theory and Practice.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
2.
ArmstrongA.2006. ‘Ethical issues in water use and sustainability’. Area38 (1): 9–15. CrossRef.
3.
ArmstrongA.2009. ‘Further Ideas Towards A Water Ethic’. Water Alternatives2 (1): 138–147.
4.
BlackbournD.2006. The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape and the Making of Modern Germany. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
5.
BogardiJ.J.2009. ‘Water disasters and ethics’. In LlamasM., Martínez-CortinaL. and MukherjiA. (eds), Water Ethics, pp. 315–326. London: CRC Press.
6.
BrownP. and SchmidtJ.. 2010. ‘An ethics of compassionate retreat’. In BrownP. and SchmidtJ. (eds), Water Ethics: Foundational Readings for Students and Professionals. pp. 265–286. Washington DC: Island Press.
7.
ButterworthJ., WarnerJ., MoriartyP., SmitsS. and BatchelorC.. 2010. ‘Finding practical approaches to integrated water resources management’. Water Alternatives1 (3): 68–81.
8.
DrenthenM.2011. ‘Reading ourselves through the land. Landscape hermeneutics and ethics of place’. In DixonF. and ClingermanM. (eds), Placing Nature on the Borders of Religion, Philosophy and Ethics, pp. 123–138. Farnham: Ashgate.
FalkenmarkM. and FolkeC.. 2010. ‘Ecohydrosolidarity: A new ethics for stewardship of value-adding rainfall’. In BrownP. and SchmidtJ. (eds), Water Ethics. Foundational Readings for Students and Professionals. pp. 247–264. Washington DC: Island Press.
GoodallH.2008. ‘Riding the tide: Indigenous Knowledge, history and water in a changing Australia’. Environment and History14: 355–384. CrossRef.
14.
GroenfeldtD.2010. ‘Viewpoint – the next nexus? Environmental ethics, water policies, and cimate change’. Water Alternatives3 (3): 575–586.
15.
HabermanD.2000. ‘River of Love in an Age of Pollution’. In ChappleC. and Evelyn TuckerM. (eds), Hinduism and Ecology. The Intersection of Earth, Sky, and Water. pp. 340–354. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ImlayS.J. and CarterE.D.. 2012. ‘Drainage on the Grand Prairie: The birth of a hydraulic society on the Midwestern frontier’. Journal of Historical Geography38 (2): 109–122. CrossRef.
17.
HeideggerM.1993. Sein und Zeit. 17th edition. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
18.
KempeM.2007. ‘Mind the Next Flood! Memories of natural disasters in northern Germany from the sixteenth century to the present’. The Medieval History Journal10: 327–354. CrossRef.
19.
KrebsA.1997. Naturethik. Grundtexte der gegenwärtigen tier- und ökoethischen Diskussion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
20.
MurphyC.2010. A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
21.
NussbaumM.2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
22.
NussbaumM.2006. Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
23.
PartzschL and ZieglerR.. 2009. ‘The political biography of water’. Paper presented at 2009 Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Delivererd 2–4 December 2009.
24.
RicoeurP.1992. Oneself as Another. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
25.
RohrC.2005. ‘The Danube floods and their human response and perception (14th to 17th Century)’. History of Meteorology2: 71–86.
26.
RohrC.2007. ‘Writing a Catastrophe: Describing and constructing disaster perception in narrative sources from the late Middle Ages’. Historical Social Research32: 88–102.
27.
SchmidtJ.2010. ‘Water ethics and water management’, in BrownP. and SchmidtJ. (eds), Water Ethics: Foundational Readings for Students and Professionals, pp. 3–15. Washington DC: Island Press.
28.
ScottJ.1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.New Haven: Yale University Press.
29.
SenA.1980. ‘Equality of what?’ In McMurrinS. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, pp. 197–220. Salt Lake City: Utah.
30.
SenA.1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
SenA.2004. ‘Why we should preserve the spotted owl’. London Review of Books26: no. 3, pp. 10–11.
32.
TheesfeldI. and SchleyerC.. 2010. ‘How do Germany's Water Authorities respond to the need for integration within hydrogeological units as required by the EU Water Framework Directive?’ Paper presented at the A. D. Thaer Kolloquium. Delivered 18 November 2010. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
33.
WhiteleyJ.M, IngramH.M. and PerryR.W. (eds.). 2008. Water, Place, and Equity.Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef.
34.
ZieglerR. and OttK.. 2011. ‘The quality of sustainability science: A philosophical perspective’. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy7 (1): 31–44.
35.
ZieglerR., PartzschL., GebauerJ., HenkelM., LodemannJ. and MohauptF.. 2014. Social Entrepreneurship in the Water Sector. Getting Things Done Sustainably.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
