Décroissance has established itself in Southern Europe as a significant and heterogeneous societal movement, which fosters a renaissance of traditional streams of thought in social and political philosophy while opening a field for new actualisations. While the term Décroissance can be traced back to an authorised translation of Georgescu-Roegen's ‘declining state’, the idea of Décroissance – as it is widely employed by social movements – encompasses more than the critique of GDP as a measure for well-being. It embodies a radical questioning of the way social reproduction is intended and frames a multifaceted vision for a post-growth society. The aim of this paper is the reconstruction and critical examination – from the point of view of social and political philosophy – of the main conceptual roots of Décroissance and its visions for a radical transformation of society.
AcostaA.2011. ‘Buen Vivir auf dem Weg in die Post-Entwicklung: Ein globales Konzept?’ In RätzW., Egan-KriegerT., VetterA., MuracaB., PassadakisA. and SchmelzerM. (eds.), Ausgewachsen! Ökologische Gerechtigkeit, Soziale Rechte, Gutes Leben, pp. 170–180. Hamburg: VSA.
BruniL., ZamagniS.2004. Economia Civile. Efficienza, equità, felicità pubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
6.
CacciariP.2009. Decrescita o Barbarie. Roma: Carta.
7.
CailléA.2004. ‘Marcel Mauss et le paradigme du don’. Sociologie et sociétés36(2): 141–176. CrossRef.
8.
CailléA.2007. Anthropologie du don. Le tiers paradigm. Paris: Édition La Découverte.
9.
CallicottJ. B.1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. New York: University of New York Press.
10.
CastoriadisC.2010. A Society Adrift: Interviews and Debates, 1974–1997. New York: Fordham University Press.
11.
CastoriadisC.1997. ‘The Greek Polis and the creation of democracy’. In CurtisD.A. (ed.), The Castoriadis Reader, pp. 267–289. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
12.
CastoriadisC.1965. Modern Capitalism and Revolution. London: Solidarity Book.
13.
CheynetV.2006. ‘L'universalisme, raison de notre engagement pour la décroissance, Critique du dernier livre de Serge Latouche Le Pari de la décroissance’. http://www.decroissance.org/?chemin=textes/parilatouche (Retrieved 10 Sept. 2011).
14.
De BenoistA.2007. Demain, la décroissance. Paris: Édite.
15.
DebordG.1971. La Planète malade. Paris: Gallimard 2004.
16.
DebordG.1955. ‘Introduction à une critique de la géographie urbaine’ (translation by Ken Knabb from the Situationist International Anthology, Revised and Expanded Edition, 2006).
17.
DemariaF., SchneiderF., CalsamigliaA., BlancoL., DomeneghiniD.2011. ‘Degrowth in Südeuropa: Komplementarität in der Vielfalt’. In: RätzW., Egan-KriegerT. v., VetterA., MuracaB., PassadakisA. and SchmelzerM. (eds.), Ausgewachsen! Ökologische Gerechtigkeit, Soziale Rechte, Gutes Leben, pp. 159–169. Hamburg: VSA.
18.
DuvergerT.2011a. ‘De Meadows à Mansholt: L'invention du “zégisme”’. Entropia10: 114–123.
19.
DuvergerT.2011b. La décroissance, une idée pour demain: une alternative au capita-lisme: synthèse des mouvements. Paris: Sang de la terre.
FlipoF.2009. ‘Les racines conceptuelles de la décroissance’. In MylondoB. (ed.), La décroissance économique. Pour la soutenabilité écologique et l'équité sociale, pp. 19–32. Broissieux: Éditions du Croquant.
22.
FraserN. and HonnethA.2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
23.
Georgescu-RoegenN.1979. Demain la décroissance: entropie-écologie-économie. Lausanne: P.M. Favre.
24.
GiornalJ.2002. ‘Défaire le développement, Refaire le monde’. Réfractions9: 119–122.
25.
GorzA.1967. Strategy for Labor; A Radical Proposal. Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
GorzA.1980. Ecology as Politics. Boston: South End Press.
GrinevaldJ.2011. ‘Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen et le “message terrestre” de la décroissance’. Entropia10: 135–154.
29.
IllichI.1973. La Convivialité. Paris: Seuil (2003).
30.
IllichI.1978. Toward a History of Needs. New York: Pantheon Books.
31.
JacobJ.1997. New Pioneers. The Back-to-the-Land Movement and the Search for a Sustainable Future. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
32.
JacksonT.2009. Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Earthscan.
33.
KavoulakosK.1994. ‘The relationship of realism and utopianism in the theories on democracy of Habermas and Castoriadis’. Society and Nature3: 69–97.
34.
LatoucheS.2007. La Scommessa della Decrescita. Milano: Feltrinelli.
35.
LatoucheS.2005. ‘Écofascisme ou écodémocratie. Esquisse d'un programme « poli-tique » pour la construction d'une société de décroissance’. Revue du MAUSS26(2): 279–293. CrossRef.
36.
LatoucheS.2009. ‘La décroissance comme projet politique de gauche’. Revue du MAUSS34: 38–45. CrossRef.
37.
LatoucheS.2004. Die Unvernunft der ökonomischen Vernunft.Zürich/Berlin: Diaphanes.
38.
Loubet del BayleJ.-L.1998. ‘Le mouvement personnaliste français des années 1930 et sa postérité’. Politique et Sociétés17(1-2): 219–237. CrossRef.
39.
MarcuseH.1972. ‘Nature and Revolution’. In MarcuseH., Counterrevolution and Revolt, pp. 59–78. Boston: Beacon Press.
40.
Martinez-AlierJ., PascualU., VivienF.-D. and ZaccaiE.. 2010. ‘Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm’. Ecological Economics69(9): 1741–1747. CrossRef.
41.
Martinez-AlierJ.2002. The Environmentalism of the Poor. Cheltenham: Elsevier.
42.
Meadows, D. H. and Club of Rome. 1972. The Limits to Growth; a Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind.New York: Universe Books.
43.
MuracaB.2010. Denken im Grenzgebiet: Prozessphilosophische Grundlagen einer Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit. Freiburg/München: Alber.
44.
MuracaB.2011 ‘The map of moral significance: a new matrix for environmental ethics’ Environmental Values20: 375–396. CrossRef.
45.
MuracaB.2012a. ‘Towards a fair degrowth-society: Justice and the right to a “good life” beyond growth’. Futures44: 535–545. CrossRef.
46.
MuracaB.2012b. ‘Gutes Leben jenseits von Wachstum: eine ethische Perspektive’. Ethik und Gesellschaft - ökumenische Zeitschrift für Sozialethik 1/2012. urn:nbn:de:0147-1-2012-003-09.
47.
NussbaumM. C.2000. Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
48.
OstromE. and AhnT.-K.. 2003. Foundations of Social Capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
49.
OttK.2012. ‘Variants of de-growth and deliberative democracy: A Habermasian proposal’. Futures44: 571–581. CrossRef.
50.
OttK., MuracaB. and BaatzC.. 2011. ‘Strong sustainability as a frame for sustainability communication’ In GodemannJ. and MichelsenG. (eds.), Sustainability Communication, pp. 13–26. Berlin: Springer. CrossRef.
51.
PaechN.2011. ‘Vom vermeintlich nachhaltigen Wachstum zur Postwachstums-ökonomie’. In RätzW., Egan-KriegerT. v., VetterA., MuracaB., PassadakisA. and SchmelzerM. (eds.), Ausgewachsen! Ökologische Gerechtigkeit, Soziale Rechte, Gutes Leben, pp. 31–42. Hamburg: VSA.
52.
PallanteM.2005. La decrescita felice: la qualità della vita non dipende dal pil. Roma: Editori riuniti.
53.
RahnemaM.2001. The Riches of the Poor. Oakland: The Oakland-Table.
54.
SawickiF.2004. ‘Les Socialistes’. In BeckerJ.-J. and CandarG. (eds.): Histoire des gauches en France, pp. 27–50. Paris: La Découverte.
55.
SchneiderF.2008. ‘Macroscopic rebound effects as argument for economic degrowth’. In FlipoF. and SchneiderF. (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Economic De-growth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, pp. 29–36. Research & Degrowth, INT.
56.
SeidlI. and ZahrnA. (eds.) 2010. Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis.
57.
SenA.1980. ‘Equality of What?’ In The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, vol. I, pp. 197–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED)1987. Our Common Future. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
ZamagniS.2005a. ‘Per una teoria economica-civile dell'impresa cooperative’. Working Paper 10, Università di Bologna, pp. 1–32.
60.
ZamagniS.2005b. ‘Gratuità e agire economico: il senso del volontariato’, Working Paper 9, Università di Bologna, pp. 1–19.
