The concept of nature is central in any reflection about the relationships between humans and their environment. It is frequently under attack, which created a divide in academia that might partly explain the science war of the 1990s and that is still latent. This article is an attempt to make a step ahead in this debate. It responds to the anti-essentialist critique of nature formulated by Bruno Latour in his influential book Politiques de la nature. It shows that nature as an objective nonsocial reality must be conceptualised and studied if the relationships between humans and their environment are to be properly understood and managed. It proposes a definition of the word nature that is compatible with both an essentialist view of nature and the nonseparation of nature and culture. Eventually, it argues that such a return to an essentialist view of nature does not imply the use of nature as a benchmark to measure morality.
BloorD.1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
BraunB. and CastreeN.. 1998. Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium. London and New York: Routledge.
3.
CastreeN. and BraunB.. 2001. Social Nature. Malden USA and Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishing.
4.
ChapmanA.2007. ‘The ways that nature matters: The world and the earth in the thought of Hannah Arendt’. Environmental Values16(4): 433–445. CrossRef.
5.
CrononW. (ed.). 1995. Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing NatureNew York and London: W.W. Norton and Company.
6.
DemerittD.2002. ‘What is the “social construction of nature”? A typology and sympathetic critique’. Progress in Human Geography26(6): 767–790. CrossRef.
7.
DescolaP.2005. Par-delà nature et culture, Paris, Gallimard.
8.
DumontJ. P.1992. Introduction a la Methode d'Aristote.Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, Paris.
9.
EdenS.2001. ‘Environmental issues: Nature versus the environment?’ Progress in Human Geography25: 79–85. CrossRef.
10.
EscobarA.1999. ‘After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology’. Current Anthropology40(1): 1–30. CrossRef.
11.
EvanoffR.2005. ‘Reconciling realism and constructionism in environmental ethics’. Environmental Values14(1): 61–81. CrossRef.
12.
GreenwoodD.1984. The Taming of Evolution: The Persistence of Nonevolutionary Views in the Study of Humans.Ithaca and New-York: Cornell University Press.
13.
GrossP. R. and LevittN.. 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrel with Science. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
14.
GroveR. H.1995Green Imperialism; Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism: 1600-1806. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HackingI.1999. The Social Construction of What?Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
16.
HarawayD. J.1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.Routledge, New-York.
17.
HillT.2006. ‘Finding value in nature’. Environmental Values15(3): 331–341. CrossRef.
18.
KeelingP. M.2008. ‘Does the idea of wilderness need a defence’?Environmental Values17(4): 505–519. CrossRef.
19.
KellerE.2008. ‘The banana plant and the moon: Conservation and the Malagasy ethos of life in Masoala’. American Ethnologist35(4): 650–664. CrossRef.
20.
LatourB.1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.
21.
LatourB.1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.
22.
LatourB.1999. Politiques de la nature: Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie.Paris: La Découverte.
23.
LatourB.2004. ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of facts to matters of concern’. Critical Inquiry30: 225–248. CrossRef.
24.
LatourB.2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
LatourB. and WoolgarS.. 1986. Laboratory Life : The Construction of Scientific Facts.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
LawJ.2004, After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
27.
MacnaghtenP. and UrryJ.. 1998. Contested Natures. London: Sage.
28.
MarshG. P.2012 (1874). The Earth as Modified by Human Action. Forgotten Books.
29.
MerchantC.2004. Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture.London: Routledge.
30.
MertonR. K.1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
MurphyR.1997. Sociology and Nature. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
32.
MurphyR.2004. ‘Disaster or sustainability: the dance of human agents with nature's actants’. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology41: 249–266. CrossRef.
33.
OdumE. P.1969. ‘Strategy of ecosystem development’. Science164(3877): 262–270. CrossRef.
34.
PolliniJ.2007. Slash-and-Burn Cultivation and Deforestation in the Malagasy Rain Forests: Representations and Realities. PhD Dissertation, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca N Y.
35.
PolliniJ.2010. ‘Environmental degradation narratives in Madagascar: from colonial hegemonies to humanist revisionism’. Geoforum, 41(5): 711–722. CrossRef.
36.
PolliniJ.2011. ‘The difficult reconciliation of conservation and development objectives: the case of the Malagasy Environmental Action Plan’. Human Organizations, 70(1). CrossRef.
37.
PolliniJ., and LassoieJ. P.2011. ‘Trapping peasant communities within global governance regimes: the case of the GELOSE legislation in Madagascar’. Society and Natural Resources, 24(8).
38.
PopperK.1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39.
PopperK.1966. The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge.
40.
ProctorJ. D.1998. ‘The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers88(3): 352–376. CrossRef.
41.
ScoonesI.1999. ‘New ecology and the social sciences: What prospects for a fruitful engagement’?Annual Review of Anthropology28: 479–507. CrossRef.
42.
SokalA. and BricmontJ.. 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science.Picador, New-York.
43.
SoperK.1995. What is Nature?Oxford and Malden: Blackwell.
44.
SouleM. E., and LeaseG.. 1995. Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington DC: Island Press.
45.
VogelS.2006. ‘The silence of nature’. Environmental Values15(2): 145–171. CrossRef.
46.
TerrassonF.1997. La Peur de la nature. Paris: Sang de la Terre.
47.
WoodgateG. and RedcliftM.. 1998. ‘From a “sociology of nature” to environmental sociology: Beyond social construction’. Environmental Values7(1): 3–24. CrossRef.
48.
ZimmererK. S.2000. ‘The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers90 (2): 356–369. CrossRef.
