The rapid rise in interest in geoengineering the climate as a response to global warming presents a clear and significant challenge to environmental ethics. The paper articulates what I call the ‘presumptive argument’ against geoengineering from environmental ethics, a presumption strong enough to make geoengineering almost ‘unthinkable’ from within that tradition. Two rationales for suspending that presumption are next considered. One of them is a ‘lesser evil’ argument, the other makes connections between the presumptive argument, ecofacism, and the anthropocentrism/non-anthropocentrism debate. The discussion is designed to prompt reflection on how environmental ethicists should orient themselves to the rapidly moving geoengineering debate and what they should think about the moral significance of the earth's large-scale biogeochemical processes compared to the moral significance of individuals, species, and ecosystems.
AttfieldR.1998. ‘Saving nature, feeding people and ethics’. Environmental Values7(3): 291–304.
3.
BalaG.2009. ‘Problems with geoengineering schemes to combat climate change’. Current Science96(1): 41–49.
4.
BarrettS.2008. ‘The incredible economics of geoengineering’. Environmental and Resource Economics39: 45–54.
5.
BorgmannA.1995. ‘The Nature of Nature’, in SouléMichael and LeaseGary, (eds.), Reinventing Nature: Responses to Post-Modern Deconstruction (Washington: Island Press), pp. 31–45.
6.
CallicottJ. and NelsonM.. 1998. The Great New Wilderness Debates. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
7.
CarterA.2004. ‘Saving nature and feeding people’. Environmental Ethics26 (4): 339–360.
8.
CrononW.1995. ‘The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature’ in CrononW. (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature (New York: W.W. Norton & Co), pp. 69–90.
9.
CrutzenP.2006. ‘Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?’ Climatic Change77: 211–219.
10.
DavionV. ‘Caring for nature: an ecofeminist's view of Rolston on eating, hunting, and genetics’, in PrestonC. and OuderkirkW. (eds.), Nature, Value, and Duty: Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston, III (Dordrecht, NL: Springer), pp. 119–134.
11.
DonnerSimon. 2007. ‘The domain of the gods: an editorial essay’. Climatic Change85: 231–236.
FlemingJ.2010. Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
GardinerS.2010. ‘Is ‘arming the future’ with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Some doubts about the ethics of intentionally manipulating the climate system’, in GardinerS., JamiesonD., CaneyS. and ShueH. (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 284–314.
15.
GardinerS.2011a. ‘Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: a commentary on the values of the Royal Society Report’. Environmental Values20: 163–188.
16.
GardinerS.2011b. The Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
GardinerS.2006. ‘A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption’. Environmental Values15(3): 397–413.
18.
GoodellJ.2010. How to Cool the Planet. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
HaleB. and GrundyW.P.. 2009. ‘Remediation and respect: do remediation technologies alter our responsibility?’ Environmental Values18: 397–415.
20.
HargroveE.1996. The Foundations of Environmental Ethics. Denton, TX: Environmental Ethics Books.
21.
JamiesonD.1996. ‘Ethics and intentional climate change’. Climatic Change33: 323–336.
22.
JamiesonD.2010. ‘Climate change, responsibility and justice’. Science and Engineering Ethics16: 431–445.
23.
KeithD.2000. ‘Geoengineering the climate: history and prospect’. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment25: 245–284.
24.
KelloggW. and SchneiderS.. 1974. ‘Climate stabilization: for better or for worse?’ Science186: 1163–1172.
25.
KintischE.2010. Hack the Planet: Science's Best Hope – or Worst Nightmare – for Averting Climate Catastrophe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing.
26.
LaunderB. and ThompsonJ.. 2010. Geoengineering Climate Change: Environmental Necessity or Pandora's Box?Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LeeK.1999. The Natural and the Artifactual: The Implications of Deep Science and Deep Technology for Environmental Philosophy. New York: Lexington Books.
28.
LeopoldA.1970. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
NelsonM. and CallicottJ.. 2008. The Wilderness Debate Rages On. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
36.
NortonBryan. 1994. Towards Unity Amongst Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
NortonBryan. 1992. Why Preserve Natural Variety?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
PalmerC.2011. ‘Does nature matter? The place of the nonhuman in the ethics of climate change’, in ArnoldD., (ed.), The Ethics of Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 272–291.
39.
PrestonC.2008. ‘Synthetic biology: drawing a line in Darwin's sand’. Environmental Values17(1): 23–39.
40.
ReganT.1981. ‘The nature and possibility of an environmental ethic’. Environmental Ethics3(1): 19–34.
41.
RobockA.2008. ‘Twenty reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists64(2): 14–18. doi: 10.2968/064002006.
42.
RobockA, OmanL. and StenchikovG.. 2008. ‘Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and arctic SO2 injections’. Journal of Geophysical Research113, D16101. doi: 10.1029/2008JD010050.
43.
RolstonH.III1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
44.
RolstonH.III1996. ‘Feeding people versus saving nature’, in AikenW. and LaFolletteH. (eds.), World Hunger and Morality (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1996), pp. 248–267.
45.
RoutleyR.1973. ‘Is there a need for a new, an environmental ethic?’ Proceedings of the 15th World congress of Philosophy1: 205–210.
