In this paper we make an argument for limiting veterinary expenditure on companion animals. The argument combines two principles: the obligation to give and the self-consciousness requirement. In line with the former, we ought to give money to organisations helping to alleviate preventable suffering and death in developing countries; the latter states that it is only intrinsically wrong to painlessly kill an individual that is self-conscious. Combined, the two principles inform an argument along the following lines: rather than spending inordinate amounts of money on veterinary care when a companion animal is sick or injured, it is better to give the money to an aid organisation and painlessly kill the animal.
FrancioneG.2000. Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
HookerB.2000. Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15.
HoussanN. and KreigalU.. 2008. ‘Consciousness and the moral permissibility of infanticide’. Journal of Applied Philosophy25: 45–55.
16.
JamiesonD.1993. ‘Method and moral theory’, in SingerP. (ed.), A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd).
17.
JamiesonD.2005. ‘Duties to the distant: aid, assistance and intervention in the developing world’. Journal of Ethics9: 151–170.
18.
McMahanJ.2008. ‘Eating animals the nice way’. Daedalus, Winter: 1–11.
19.
McMahanJ.2004. The Ethics of Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
MillerC.2009. ‘Empathy, social psychology and global helping traits’. Philosophical Studies142: 247–275.
21.
NarvesonJ.2003. ‘We don't owe them a thing! A tough-minded but soft-hearted view of aid to the faraway needy’. Monist86: 419–433.
22.
NozickR.2001. Anarchy, State and Utopia.Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
PoggeT.2002. World Poverty and Human Rights.Oxford: Polity Press.
24.
RailtonP.1984. ‘Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality’. Philosophy and Public Affairs13: 134–171.
25.
ReganT.2004. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
RogersL.J. and KaplanG.. 2004. ‘All animals are not equal’, in SunsteinD.R. and NussbaumM.C. (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates New Directions (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
27.
RollinBernard E.2005. ‘Reasonable partiality and animal ethics’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice8: 105–121.
28.
SapontzisS.F.1987. Morals, Reason and Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
SerpellJ.1998. ‘Companion animals and pets’, in BekoffM. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).
30.
SingerP.2009. The Life you can Save: Acting now to end World Poverty. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
31.
SingerP.2006. ‘What a billionaire should give – and what should you’. New York Times Magazine, December 17.
32.
SingerP.2004. The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SingerP.1993. Practical Ethics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SingerP.1972. ‘Famine, affluence and morality’. Philosophy and Public Affairs1: 229–243.
35.
SmartJ.J.C. and WilliamsB.. 2005. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Special Broadcasting Service. 2001. The SBS World Guide Fourteenth Edition. South Yarra: Hardie Grant Publishing.
37.
TaylorP.1986. Respect for Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
TooleyM.1972. ‘Abortion and infanticide’. Philosophy and Public Affairs2: 37–65.
39.
UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine.2005. ‘Kidney transplant program helps cats and dogs thrive – veterinarians also investigate techniques to improve long-term survival’. UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine <http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/whatsnew/article2.cfm?id=1402>, accessed 14 December 2007.
40.
UngerP.1996. Living High and Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
United Nations Children's Fund.2007. Annual Report 2006. New York: UNICEF.
