This study was designed to evaluate a range of avian semen extenders for liquid storage of Indian Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) spermatozoa at 5 °C. Semen was collected from 8 mature trained cocks and processed in the Beltsville Poultry, Turkey, Lake, EK, Tselutin Poultry and Chicken semen extenders for storage at 5 °C. Semen quality parameters viz, motility (%), plasma membrane integrity (%), livability (%) and acrosomal integrity (%) were assessed at 0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours of storage. A time dependent decrease was observed in motility, plasma membrane and acrosomal integrity in all experimental extenders during the storage period. However, the Turkey semen extender was found significantly (P<0.05) superior for protecting all aforementioned semen quality parameters compared to the Beltsville Poultry, Lake, EK, Tselutin Poultry and Chicken semen extenders. It is concluded that the Turkey semen extender can be used efficiently for the liquid storage of Indian Red Jungle Fowl spermatozoa at 5 °C.
BakstM.R., and CecilH.C. (1997) Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage, and fertility determination. 3. Sperm acrosomal integrity. I. Nigrosin/ eosin stain for determining live/dead and abnormal sperm counts.The Poultry Science Association Inc., Savoy, IL, pp. 29–34.
2.
BakstM.R. (1980) Fertilizing capacity and morphology of fowl and turkey spermatozoa in hypotonic extender. J. Reprod. Fert., 60, 121–127.
3.
BlancoJ.M., GeeG., WildtD.E., and DonoghueA.M. (2000) Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle, and peregrine falcon spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod., 63, 1164–1171.
4.
BlesboisE., and De ReviersM. (1992) Effect of different fractions of seminal plasma on the fertilizing ability of fowl spermatozoa stored in vitro. J. Reprod. Fert., 95, 263–268.
5.
BlesboisE., GrasseauI., SeigneurinF., Mignon-GrasteauS., Saint JalmeM., and Mialon-RichardM.M. (2008) Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology, 69, 252–261.
6.
BurrowsW.H., and QuinnJ.P. (1935) A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci., 14, 251–253.
7.
ClarkeR.N., BakstM.R., and OttingerM.A. (1984) Morphological changes in chicken and turkey spermatozoa incubated under various conditions. Poultry Sci., 63, 801–805.
8.
ErnstR.A., and OgasawaraF.X. (1970) A live-dead stain to test poultry semen quality.University of California Agricultural Extension Service, Davis, p. 245.
9.
EstevesS.C., SchneiderD.T., and VerzaJ.S. (2007) Influence of antisperm antibodies in the semen on intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Int. Braz. J. Urol., 33, 795–802.
10.
FromanD. P., and FeltmannA. J. (1998) Sperm mobility: a quantitative trait of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod., 58, 379–384.
11.
FromanD.P., FeltmannA.J., RhoadsM.L., and KirbyJ.D. (1999) Sperm mobility: a primary determinant of fertility in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod., 61, 400–405.
12.
FujiharaN., and XiY.M. (2000) Possible application of animal reproductive researches to the restoration of endangered and/ or extinct wild animals. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13, 1026–1034.
13.
GeeG.F. (1995) Artificial insemination and cryopreservation of semen from nondomestic birds. In: BakstM.R, and WishartG.J. (eds), Proceedings of 1st international symposium on the artificial insemination of poultry, pp. 262–279. Poultry Science Association, Savoy, IL.
14.
GiesenA.F., and SextonT.J. (1983) Beltsville poultry semen extender. 7. Comparison of commercial diluents for holding turkey semen six hours at 15 °C. Poultry Sci., 62, 379–381.
15.
GrahamE.F., and BrownK.I. (1971) Effect of osmotic pressure of semen extenders on the fertility and hatchability of turkey eggs. Poultry Sci., 42, 536–538.
16.
HanX.F., NiuZ.Y., LiuF.Z., and YangC.S. (2005) Effects of diluents, cryoprotectants, equilibration time and thawing temperature on cryopreservation of duck semen. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4, 197–201.
17.
HarrisG. C., HobbsT. D., BrownJ. E., and WarrenL. B. (1963) The storage of turkey spermatozoa in sodium citrate and carbon dioxide extenders. Poult. Sci., 42, 536–538.
18.
HobbsT.D., and HarrisG.C. (1963) Effect of freezing point depression and pH on the motility and fertility of chicken spermatozoa stored in sodium citrate extenders. Poultry Sci., 42, 254–259.
19.
HolsbergerD.R., DonoghueA.M., FromanD.P., and OttingerM.A. (1998) Assessment of ejaculate quality and sperm characteristics in turkeys: sperm mobility phenotype is independent of time. Poultry Sci., 77, 1711–1717.
20.
JianzhongL., and ZhangY. (2006) Methods and effects of Hongshan cock spermatozoa cryopreservation. Wuhan Uni. J. Nat. Sci., 1, 447–450.
21.
KingL.M., HolsbergerD.R., and DonoghueA.M. (2000) Correlation of CASA velocity and linearity parameters with sperm mobility phenotype in turkeys. J. Androl., 21, 65–71.
22.
LakeP.E. (1960) Studies on the dilution and storage of fowl semen. J. Reprod. Fertil., 1, 30–35.
23.
LakeP.E., and McindoeW.M. (1959) The glutamic acid and creatine content of cock seminal plasma. Biochem. J., 71, 301–306.
24.
LakeP.E., and RavieO. (1982) Effect on fertility of storing turkey semen for 24 hours at 10 °C in fluids of different pH. Brit. Poultry Sci., 23, 41–47.
25.
LakeP.K. (1978) The principles and practice of semen collection and preservation in birds. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 43, 31–49.
26.
LongJ.A. (2006) Avian semen cryopreservation: what are the biological challenges?Poultry Sci., 85, 232–236.
27.
ŁtukaszewiczE. (2002a) Cryopreservation of Anser anser L. gander semen (in Polish). Zeszt. Nauk. AR we Wrocłtawiu, 440, 1–111.
28.
ŁtukaszewiczE. (2002b) An effective method for freezing White Italian gander semen. Theriogenology, 58, 19–27.
29.
ŁtukaszewiczE., ChrzanowskaM., JeryszA., and ChełtmoiskaB. (2004) Attempts on freezing the Greylag (Anser anser) gander semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 80, 163–173.
30.
MalikA., HaronA., YusoffW., BukarR., NesaM., and KasimA. (2013) Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken and bantam chicken inMalaysia. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 37, 564–568.
31.
MohanJ., KhandayJ.M., SinghR.P., and TyagiJ.S. (2013) Effect of storage on the physic-biochemical characteristics and fertility of guinea fowl semen. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 2, 65–68.
32.
NagyS., JansenJ., TopperE.K., and GadellaB.M. (2003) A triple-stain flow cytometric method to assess plasma-and acrosome-membrane integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm immediately after thawing in presence of egg-yolk particles. Biol. Reprod., 68, 1828–1835.
33.
OgaswaraF.X., and ErnstR. A. (1975) Recent developments in artificial insemination of turkeys. Feedstuffs, 47, 23–35.
34.
RakhaB.A., HussainI., AkhterS., UllahN., AndrabiS.M.H., and AnsariM.S. (2013) Evaluation of Tris–citric acid, skim milk and sodium citrate extenders for liquid storage of Punjab Urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) spermatozoa. Reprod. Biol., 13, 238–242.
35.
RakhaB.A., AnsariM.S., HussainI., MalikM.F., AkhterS., BlesboisE. (2015) Semen characteristics of the Indian Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi). European J. Wildlife Res., 61, 379–86
36.
RakhaB.A., HussainI., MalikM.F., AkhterS., AnsariM.S. (2015) Impact of ejaculate frequencies on the quality of Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) semen. Avian Biol. Res., 8, 109–12.
37.
RamuS., and JeyendranR.S. (2013) The hypo-osmotic swelling test for evaluation of sperm membrane integrity. Methods Mol. Biol., 972, 21–25.
38.
SaekiY. (1960) Crooked-necked spermatozoa in relation to low fertility in artificial insemination of fowl. Poultry Sci., 39, 1354–1361.
39.
Santiago-MorenoJ., CastañoC., ColomaM.A., Gómez-BrunetA., Toledano-DíazA., López-SebastiánA., and CampoJ.L. (2009) Use of the hypo-osmotic swelling test and aniline blue staining to improve the evaluation of seasonal sperm variation in native Spanish free-range poultry. Poultry Sci., 88, 2661–2669.
40.
SextonT.J. (1976) Studies on the dilution of turkey semen. Brit. Poultry Sci., 17, 179–184.
41.
SextonT.J. (1977) A new poultry semen extender 1. Effect of extension on the fertility of chicken semen. Poultry Sci., 56, 1443–1446.
42.
SextonT.J. (1981) Development of a commercial method for freezing turkey semen: 1. Effect of prefreeze techniques on the fertility of frozen and frozen-thawed semen. Poultry Sci., 60, 1567–1572.
43.
SiudzinskaA., and ŁtukaszewiczE. (2008) Effect of semen extenders and storage time on sperm morphology of four chicken breeds. J. Appl. Poul. Res., 17, 101–108.
44.
SubhaniA., AwanM.S., AnwarM., AliU., and DarN.I. (2010) Population Status and Distribution Pattern of Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) in Deva Vatala National Park, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan: A Pioneer Study. Pak. J. Zool., 42, 701–706.
45.
TselutinK., NarubinaL., MavrodinaT., and TurB. (1995) Cryopreservation of poultry semen. Brit. Poultry Sci., 36, 805–811.
46.
TsukunagaS. (1971) Morphological evidence of temperature shock in fowl sperm (preliminary report). Bull. Hiroshima Agric. Coll., 4, 145–153.
47.
Van WambekeF. (1967) The storage of fowl spermatozoa. I. Preliminary results with new diluents. J. Reprod. Fert., 13, 571–575.
48.
ZahraddeenD., ButswatI.S.R., KallaD.J.U., SirS.M., and BukarM.T. (2005) Effect of frequency of ejaculation on semen characteristics in two breeds of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) raised in a tropical environment. Int. J. Poul. Sci., 4, 217–221.
49.
ZemjanisR. (1970) Diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in animal reproduction, 2nd edition. William and Wilkins Company, Baltimore, p. 149.
