Abstract
It seems as if the tubercle bacillus offered an exceptional opportunity to study the question presented in the title of this study. As is well known, one type of the bacillus, namely, the human type, is non virulent for the rabbit, whereas the bovine type causes a general tuberculosis in this animal. Accordingly experiments were instituted in the following manner: four rabbits were injected for each test, two with a human type of bacillus, the other two with the bovine type, in each case 1/100 mg. and 1 mg. of a culture being injected into the ear vein. These four animals were bled one half hour, one hour, two hours, and three hours after injection, 5 cu. cm. being caught in a solution of sodium citrate. There were thus eight specimens taken from the two rabbits inoculated with the human tubercle bacillus, and eight from the two inoculated with the bovine bacillus. These sixteen specimens were injected into as many guinea-pigs, and after six weeks these animals were examined for tuberculosis.
In all, six experiments of this description were successfully carried out, using twenty-four rabbits and 112 pigs. In the tuberculosis test, 44 of the pigs injected with “bovine blood” survived, 26 of these, that is, 69 per cent., were found tuberculous. Of 45 of those injected with the human virus 7 developed tuberculosis, that is, about 18 1/2 per cent. In almost all of these experiments the bovine bacillus was found more frequently in the circulation than the human type of bacillus. This was not the case to any great extent in two of the experiments, where the bovine strain was not of marked virulence.
The conclusion is, therefore, that a certain parallelism exists between the virulence of the tubercle bacillus and its persistence in the circulation of the rabbit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.