Abstract
Dutcher and coworkers, 1 Hart, Steenbock and Ellis, 2 and Hess, Unger and Supplee 3 presented evidence to show that the diet of a dairy cow influenced the antiscorbutic potency of the milk produced. Using guinea pigs to test the antiscorbutic potency of the ration which was fed and to assay the milk which was produced, each of these groups of workers found that milk obtained from cows on a vitamin-rich ration was definitely superior in antiscorbutic value to the milk derived from cows on a vitamin-poor diet. These findings, though widely accepted, were disputed by Hughes and coworkers, 4 who concluded from a series of experiments that the ration received by cows had no influence on the antiscorbutic property of their milk.
Since the development of chemical methods for the quantitative determination of the antiscorbutic factor, which was shown to be ascorbic acid, differences of opinion have arisen concerning the factors which have the greatest influence on the amount of vitamin C in milk. It is now generally agreed, however, that the vitamin C content of milk is independent of the season of the year and the ration of the cow. 5 This fact has led to the present investigation of the fate of ingested ascorbic acid in the cow.
A rumen fistula was made in a Holstein cow. Experiments were performed in which this cow was fed (A) 100 g (2,000,000 International Units) and (B) 150 g of synthetic ascorbic acid mixed with corn silage; 100 g of ascorbic acid were also placed directly in the rumen through the fistula opening.
Similar results were obtained in all of the experiments. No increase was observed in the ascorbic acid values of the blood plasma and of the milk when compared with those values obtained while the cow was on a standard ration unsupplemented with the vitamin.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
