Abstract
In a 3-weeks'study of the vitamin C content of the urine of normal individuals when comparable amounts of vitamin C were added to a diet free of vitamin C in the form of orange juice, cevitamic acid by mouth and cevitamic acid intravenously (Hawley, Stephens & Anderson, 1 ) unexplainable variations were found in the C output of several individuals. If this method, which appears to be the most satisfactory method of determining vitamin C undernutrition, is to be of value, the variation in response must not be greater than normal biological deviation. A chance observation on a hospital patient suggested that changes in the pH of the urine might be one factor affecting the results. Marked changes in the vitamin C content of the urine in spite of constancy of intake were observed and were found to be correlated inversely with the pH. Accordingly, the experiment now in progress, and to date of 13 weeks'duration, was designed. The subjects, 3 at first and then 2, have maintained throughout a constant diet. The effect of changes in pH brought about by the ingestion of NaHCO3 or of NH4Cl on vitamin C content of the urine has been observed when the vitamin was administered as orange juice and cevitamic acid (Merck's “Cebione” supplied by them for this purpose) both by mouth and by intravenous injection.
The effect was striking and consistent. A marked decrease in output has resulted in all instances when the urinary pH was in the alkaline range of 7.5-8.1. This effect was found not to be due to a reversible oxidation. The question arises whether this decrease is due to destruction or to better utilization (increased storage) of the vitamin. One might assume the latter from the fact that foods rich in vitamin C are initially acid but basic as a result of metabolic processes. Preliminary studies on the C content of guinea pig liver (Hawley & Daggs—unpublished work) suggest that there is greater storage under the influence of the NaHCO3.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.