Abstract
Abstract
Osteomalacia has been noted following in vivo aluminum (Al) loading in the rat by some investigators but not by others. To determine whether the response of bone to Al differs as a function of the skeletal site examined, quantitative histology of cortical and trabecular bone was done in the tibiae from control (C, n = 10), Al-treated (AL, n = 9), nephrectomized control (NX-C, n = 7), and nephrectomized Al-treated (NX-AL, n = 8) rats given 2 mg/day of Al for 4 weeks. Bone Al content was determined by histochemical methods. In cortical bone, osteoid seam width, osteoid volume, and percent osteoid area were similar for all groups. In contrast, for trabecular bone, both forming surface (x ± SD) (5.2 ± 3.4 vs 1.8 ± 1.1%, P < 0.05) and osteoid volume (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.0 ± 0.4%, P < 0.05) increased from control values in AL, although osteoid seam width did not differ. In NX-AL, trabecular forming surface (20.2 ± 6.7 vs 6.2 ± 2.4%, P < 0.01), osteoid area (13.2 ± 5.7 vs 3.5 ± 0.8%, P < 0.01), and osteoid width (18.7 ± 5.7 vs 9.7 ± 2.3 μm, P < 0.01) all were greater than in NX-C. Deposits of Al were undetectable in C and NX-C, were minimal in cortical bone in AL and NX-AL, but were present at 40.5 ± 11.5 and 71.1 ± 6.5% of trabecular surfaces in AL and NX-AL, respectively. Osteoid area and osteoid surface each correlated with trabecular bone Al. Thus, (a) osteoid accumulates in trabecular, but not in cortical, bone after 4 weeks of Al loading; (b) the extent of osteoid accumulation correlates with the bone Al content; and (c) the histologic response to Al in cortical and trabecular bone is related to local differences in the uptake of Al into bone.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.