This case study explores experiences of a bisexual Latino male (age 18) whose identities cross various boundaries of heteronormativity routinely legitimized through a variety of school practices. Using a queer theoretical lens, the author examines intersections of race, ethnicity, class, spirituality, sexual orientation, and gender performance as reflected in the lived realities of this young man played out in the environment of a large, urban public high school in the southwest United States. Performance of a fluid masculinity provides a central vehicle for negotiations and synthesis of competing identities against conflicting peer and social norms and as a focus of this inquiry. Victor Turner's (1995) concept of liminality provides a staging area for a construct of holistic masculinity in which formation and articulation of identities are actually clarified rather than blurred.
AbalosD.T. (2002). The Latino male: A radical definition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
2.
AndersonG.HerrK., & NihlenA. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator's guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
3.
AnzalduaG. (1999). Borderlands = la frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
4.
BarryR. (2000). Sheltered “children”: The self-creation of a safe space by gay, lesbian, and bisexual students. In WeisL. & FineM. (Eds.), Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth (pp. 129–152). New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
5.
BoonK.A. (2005). Heroes, metanarratives, and the paradox of masculinity in contemporary western culture. The Journal of Men's Studies, 13(3), 301–312.
6.
BordoS. (1999). The male body: A new look at men in public and in private. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
7.
ConnellR.W. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for school. Teachers College Record, 98(2), 206–235.
8.
CorbettK. (1999). Homosexual boyhood: Notes on girlyboys. In RottnekM. (Ed.), Sissies and tomboys: Gender nonconformity and homosexual childhood (pp. 107–139). New York: New York University Press.
9.
FaludiS. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American male. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
10.
Fausto-SterlingA. (1999). Is gender essential? In RottneckM. (Ed.), Sissies and tomboys: Gender nonconformity and homosexual childhood (pp. 52–57). New York: New York University Press.
11.
FriendR.A. (1993). Choices, not closets: Heterosexism and homophobia in schools. In WeisL. & FineM. (Ed.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in U.S. schools (pp. 209–235). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12.
Goldrick-JonesA. (2002). Men who believe in feminism. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
HerrK. (1999). Institutional violence in the everyday practices of school: The narrative of a young lesbian. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 5(3), 242–255.
14.
KantrowitzA. (1999). Such a polite little boy. In RottneckM. (Ed.), Sissies and tomboys: Gender nonconformity and homosexual childhood (pp. 226–235). New York: New York University Press.
15.
KimmelM. (2000). The gendered society. New York: The Oxford University Press.
16.
KissenR.M. (Ed.). (2002). Getting ready for Benjamin: Preparing teachers for sexual diversity in the classroom. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
LassellM. (1999). Boys don't do that. In RottneckM. (Ed.), Sissies and tomboys: Gender nonconformity and homosexual childhood (pp. 245–262). New York: New York University Press.
18.
LeckG.M. (2000). Heterosexual or homosexual? Reconsidering binary narratives on sexual identities in urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 3, 324–348.
19.
LehringG.L. (2003). Officially gay: The politics and construction of sexuality by the U.S. military. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
LeskoN. (Ed.). (2000). Masculinities at school. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21.
MandelL., & ShakeshaftC. (2000). Heterosexism in middle schools. In LeskoN. (Ed.), Masculinities at school (pp. 75–103). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
22.
QuinlivanK., & TownS. (1999). Queer pedagogy, educational practice, and lesbian and gay youth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(5), 509–524.
23.
TurnerV. (1995). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter Press.
24.
Weaver-HightowerM. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498.
25.
WeisL., & CentrieC. (2002). On the power of separate spaces: Teachers and students writing (righting) selves and future. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 7–36.
26.
ZevyL. (1999). Sexing the tomboy. In RottnekM. (Ed.), Sissies and tomboys: Gender nonconformity and homosexual childhood (pp. 180–195). New York: New York University Press.
