Using a narrative and identity theory approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 men. They were asked to describe a critical incident in order to elicit the important factors that males describe when talking about their relationships with their fathers. The men were mostly blue collar or self-employed, with a mean age of 48 years. Six of the 38 men described poor relationships with their fathers, while 3 men described a relationship with a “super dad”. A constant comparative method was used to analyze the interview data. Results indicated seven emergent themes: personality mesh, relationship changing health experiences, reframing memories, son's changing expectations for fathers across cohorts, relationship outcomes, symbols of care, and identity. The discussion focuses on the development of unanswered questions that arose from the study that require further empirical exploration.
AdamsonsK. (2010). Using identity theory to develop a midrange model of parental gatekeeping and parenting behavior. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2(2), 137—148.
2.
BambergM. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3—24.
3.
BrothersonS.E.YamamotoT., & AcockA.C. (2003). Connection and communication in father-child relationships and adolescent child well-being. Fathering, 13, 191—214.
ButterfieldL.D.BorgenW.A.AmundsonN.E., & MaglioA.T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954—2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research5, 475—497.
6.
ChaseS.E. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In DenzinN.K. & LincolnY.S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.) (pp. 421—434). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
7.
ChellE. (1998). Critical incident technique. In SimonG. & CassellC. (Eds.), Qualitative research methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 45—60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
8.
DalyK.J.AshbourneL., & BrownJ.L. (2009). Father's perceptions of children's influence: Implications for involvement. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624, 61—77.
9.
DayR.D., & LambM.E. (Eds.). (2004). Conceptualizing and measuring father involvement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
DeyI. (1999). Grounding grounded theory. Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
FlanaganJ.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 231—264.
12.
FloydK., & MormanM. (2000). Affection received from fathers as a predictor of men's affection with their own sons: Tests of the modeling and compensation hypotheses. Communication Monographs, 67(4), 347—361. doi: 10.1080/03637750009376516
13.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
14.
GivenL.M. (2008, October). Coding & categorization: Laying the foundation for effective data analysis. Advances in Qualitative Methods Conference, Pre-Conference Workshop. Banff, AB.
15.
GlaserB.G., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
16.
GoodsellT.L.BatesJ.S. & BehnkeA.O. (2011). Fatherhood stories: Grandparents, grandchildren and gender differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(1), 134—154.
17.
HenwoodK., & PidgeonN. (2004). Grounded theory in psychological research. In CamicP.C.RoadesJ.E. & YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 95—112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
KatzS.H. (2002). Healing the father-son relationship: A qualitative inquiry into adult reconciliation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42, 13—52.
19.
LambM.E. (Ed.). (2004). The role of the father in child development (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
LaRossaR. (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Journal of Family Relations, 37, 451—457.
21.
LevantR.F. (1988). Education for fatherhood. In BronsteinP. & CowanC.P. (Eds.), Fatherhood today: Men's changing role in the family (pp. 253—275). New York, NY: Wiley.
22.
MacIntyreA. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd.ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
23.
McAdamsD.P. (2006). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
MillerE.D. (2010). Why the father wound matters: Consequences for male mental health and the father-son relationship. Child Abuse Review, 22, 194—208.
25.
MormanM.T., & FloydK. (2002). A “changing culture of fatherhood”: Effects on affectionate communication, closeness, and satisfaction in men's relationships with their fathers and sons. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 395—411.
26.
MormanM.T., & FloydK. (2006). Good fathering: Father and sons perceptions of what it means to be a good father. Fathering, 4(2), 113—136.
27.
NelsonK. (2004). Construction of the cultural self in early narratives. In DaiuteC. & Light-FootC. (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. 87—109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PellegriniR.J., & SarbinT.R. (2002). Between fathers and sons: Critical incident narratives in the development of men's lives. New York, NY: Haworth Clinical Practice Press.
30.
RoyK.M. (2006). Father stories: A life course examination of paternal identity among low-income African American men. Journal of Family Issues, 27(1), 31—54.
31.
SchwalbeM.L., & WolkmoirM. (2002). Interviewing men. In GulbruinJ.F. & HolsteinJ.A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 203—219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
SharabanyR.ScherA., & Gal-KruzJ. (2006). Like fathers, like sons? Attitudes to childrearing in light of their perceived relationships with own parents, and their attachment concerns. In MayselessO. (Ed.), Parenting representations: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 239—261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
StrykerF., & BurkeP.J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284—297.
34.
WheelockJ., & ChellE. (1996). The business-owner managed family unit: An inter-regional comparison of behavioral dynamics. London, England: Economics and Social Research Council.
