This study examined the influence of gender role transgressions on perceptions of men and women's social status, homosexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. Because past research has shown that men who transgress gender role norms are punished more harshly than women, it was hypothesized that male transgressors would be perceived more negatively than female transgressors in each of these domains. Participants read vignettes of two hypothetical gender role transgressors, one described using gender role personality traits and another described using gender role behaviors. The trait-based male gender role transgressor was perceived to be lower in social status and was considered more likely to be homosexual than the female transgressor. The behavioral-based male gender role transgressor was perceived to be lower in social status, and was perceived to be more value-dissimilar than the female gender role transgressor.
AntillJ.R. (1987). Parents' beliefs and values about sex roles, sex differences, and sexuality: Their sources and implications. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 294–328.
2.
ArcherJ. (1984). Gender roles as developmental pathways. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 245–256.
3.
ArcherJ. (1989). The relationship between gender role measures: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 173–184.
4.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston: Beacon.
5.
ConwayM.PizzamiglioM.T., & MountL. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38.
6.
CourtenayW.H. (2000). Behavioral factors associated with male disease, injury, and death: Evidence and implications for prevention. The Journal of Men's Studies, 9, 81–142.
7.
DeauxK., & LewisL.L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
8.
DeauxK., & MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
9.
EaglyA.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
EssesV.M.HaddockG., & ZannaM.P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In MacKieD.M., & HamiltonD.L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in-group perception (pp. 137–166). New York: Academic Press.
11.
FeinmanS. (1981). Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys? A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 7, 289–300.
12.
FeinmanS. (1984). A status theory evaluation of sex-role behavior and age-role behavior. Sex Roles, 10, 445–456.
13.
HaddockG., & ZannaM.P. (1994). Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25–52.
14.
HaddockG.ZannaM.P., & EssesV.M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118.
15.
HerekG.M. (1984). Beyond “homophobia”: A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(1/2), 1–21.
16.
HerekG.M. (1994). Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In GreeneB. & HerekG.M. (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
HerekG.M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22.
18.
HuiC.H., & TriandisH.C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225–248.
19.
KiteM.E. (1994). When perceptions meet reality: Individual differences in reactions to lesbians and gay men. In GreeneB. & HerekG.M. (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 25–52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
KiteM.E., & WhitleyB.E.Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.
21.
LippaR., & AradS. (1997). The structure of sexual orientation and its relation to masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: Different for men and women. Sex Roles, 37, 187–208.
22.
MahalikJ. R. (2000). Men's gender role conflict as predictors of self-ratings on the Interpersonal Circle. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 276–292.
23.
MahalikJ.R.CournoyerR.J.DeFrancW.CherryM., & NapolitanoJ. (1998). Men's gender role conflict in relation to their use of psychological defenses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 247–255.
24.
McCrearyD.R. (1990). Multidimensionality and the measurement of gender role attributes: A comment on Archer. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 265–272.
25.
McCrearyD.R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 517–531.
26.
McCrearyD.R., & RhodesN.D. (2001). On the gender-typed nature of dominant and submissive acts. Sex Roles, 44, 339–350.
27.
MarkusH.R., & KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
28.
O'NeilJ. M. (1981). Patterns of gender role conflict and strain: Sexism and fear of femininity in men's lives. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60, 203–210.
29.
O'NeilJ.M.GoodG.E., & HolmesS.E. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In LevantR. & PollackW. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 164–206). New York: Basic Books.
30.
OrlofskyJ.L. (1981). Relationship between sex role attitudes and personality traits and the sex role behavior scale-1: A new measure of masculine and feminine role behaviors and interests. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 40(5), 927–940.
31.
PleckJ.H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32.
PleckJ.H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In LevantR.F. & PollackW.S. (Eds.) A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.
33.
RosenkrantzP.S.VogelS.R.BeeH.BrovermanI.K., & BrovermanD.M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287–295.
34.
SadallaE.K.KenrickD.T., & VershureB. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52, 730–738.
35.
SchwartzS.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM.P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
36.
SchwartzS.H. (1994): Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In KimU.TriandisH.C.KagitcibasiC.ChoiS., & YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
37.
SchwartzS.H., & BilskyW. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562.
38.
SpenceJ.T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64, 624–635.
39.
SpenceJ.T., & HelmreichR.L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
40.
VerbruggeL.M. (1985). Gender and health: An update on hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 156–182.
41.
VerbruggeL.M. (1989). The twain meet: Empirical explanations of sex differences in health and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 30, 282–304.
42.
WeberM. (1946). Class, status, party. In GerthH.H. & MillsWright C. (Eds.). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180–195). New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
WhitleyB.E.Jr. (1988). The relation of gender role orientation to sexual experience among college students. Sex Roles, 19, 619–638.
