Has men's anti-sexist or profeminist activism been following “a path from optimism to pessimism,” as Lynne Segal claims? An examination of documents produced by profeminist groups in North America and Britain suggests that “crisis” (a state of change) may be a more helpful description of profeminism today. Within these documents, certain key or resonant terms illustrate conflicts that challenge idealized concepts of group “unity” and provide insights into attitudes surrounding these conflicts. These conflicts and crises can destabilize “unity” to the point where attempts to sustain centralized, politically motivated profeminist organizations like NOMAS are jeopardized. While this may be cause for pessimism, the crises experienced by such groups may also be transformative, opening up possibilities for other forms of profeminist activism.
FossS. K. (1996). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights: Waveland.
17.
GildingM. (1997). Gender roles in contemporary Australia. In HughesK. P. (Ed.), Contemporary Australian feminism (pp. 187–215). South Melbourne: Longman.
18.
Goldrick-JonesA. (1996). Men in a feminist forum: A rhetorical analysis of the White Ribbon Campaign against violence to women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
19.
JardineA., & SmithP. (Eds.). (1987). Men in feminism. New York: Routledge.
20.
KimmelM. S., & MosmillerT. E. (Eds.). (1992). Against the tide: Pro-feminist men in the United States 1776–1990: A documentary history. Boston: Beacon Press.
21.
Letters. (1993, Winter/Spring). Changing Men, pp. 3–6.
22.
MarcusJ. (1988). Australian women and feminist men. Hecate: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Women's Liberation, XIV, 98–106.
23.
MessnerM. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
24.
Men meeting because we're men. (1991). Pamphlet. Halifax: Men for Change.
25.
Men's liberation: Responding to the women's movement. (1971). Brother: A forum for men against sexism. Berkeley.
26.
ParrishG. (1992). Male supremacy and the men's pro-feminist movement: The dubious legacy of the National Organization for Men Against Sexism. Retrieved 26 January 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://www.igc.apc.org/nemesis/ACLU/oh!Brother/
27.
PeaseB. (1996). Reforming men: Masculine subjectivities and the politics and practices of profeminism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
28.
PleckJ. (1974). My male sex role—and ours. WIN, pp. 8–12.
29.
PorterD. (Ed.). (1992). Between men and feminism. Routledge: London.
30.
RowanJ. (1987). The horned god: Feminism and men as wounding and healing. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
RueckertW. H. (1982). Kenneth Burke and the drama of human relations (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
RutherfordJ. (1992). Men's silences: Predicaments in masculinity. London: Routledge.
SeidlerV. J. (1991). Men, sexual politics, and socialism. In SeidlerV. J. (Ed.), The Achilles Heel reader (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
35.
Statement from the editors and publisher. (1993, Winter/Spring). Changing Men, pp. 7–8.
36.
SteinemG. (1992.) Foreword. In HaganK. L. (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement: A feminist collection (pp. v–ix). San Francisco: Pandora.
37.
StoltenbergJ. (1997). Re: [profem] male supremacy and the men's pro-feminist movement. Retrieved 26 January 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://www.igc.apc.org/nemesis/ACLU/oh!Brother
38.
Waterloo Men's Conference. (1975). Conference program. University of Waterloo, Ontario.
WetherellM., & GriffinC. (1991). Feminist psychology and the study of men and masculinity. Part I: Assumptions and perspectives. Feminism and Psychology, 1, 361–391.
41.
WilliamsL. R. (1990). Men in feminism. Women: A cultural review, 1, 63–65.
42.
Wolf-LightP. (1994, Autumn). The shadow of Iron John. Achilles Heel: The Radical Men's Magazine, pp. 14–17.
