Final Report on Ethyl Methacrylate

Abstract

Ethyl Methacrylate is the ester of ethyl alcohol and methacrylic acid used as the major structural monomer of artificial fingernail formulations that are cross-linked with one or more multifunctional methacrylates. Ethyl methacrylate monomer is polymerized rapidly and very little free monomer is available even during filing of the fingernails. The oral LD₅₀ for rats ranged from 12.7 to 18.14 g/kg, with lesions in the respiratory system and hemoglobinuria observed in treated animals. Ocular, nasal, and respiratory tract irritation was observed in acute inhalation tests using rats. Very little toxicity was seen in subchronic studies using rabbits. Ethyl Methacrylate caused irritation and vehicle dependent sensitization in animals, but no photosensitization. Evidence of embryotoxic and teratogenic effects were observed in pregnant rats after intraperitoneal injection of Ethyl Methacrylate at a range of concentrations. Both positive and negative mutagenicity test data were found. Clinical testing showed little evidence of irritation, although case studies report allergic contact dermatitis as a result of exposure to Ethyl Methacrylate and related methacrylates with application of artificial fingernails. Occupational contact dermatitis from acrylates and methacrylates are also reported, with some evidence for cross-reactivity between the two chemical classes. Based on the sensitizing potential of this ingredient the CIR Expert Panel recommended that fingernail enhancement formulations with Ethyl Methacrylate be applied only by trained individuals and that the ingredient not be used in products intended for retail sale (currently, these products are believed to be sold only for application by a trained individual). Because of the low likelihood of significant exposure if such formulations are applied properly, the Expert Panel concluded that the ingredient is safe as used, with the caveat that skin contact should be avoided.

Keywords

Ethyl methacrylate Embryotoxic effect Teratogenic effect

References

Black RE . (1977) Analysis of Nail Extenders. Newberger's Man. Cosmet. Anal. 2nd Ed, 70–1.

Calnan CD . (1980) Acrylates in industry. Contact Derm 6:3–4.

Chung CW , Giles AL . (1977) Sensitization potentials of methyl, ethyl, and n-butyl methacrylates and mutual cross-sensitivity in guinea pigs. J Invest Dermatol 68:187–90.

Condé-Salazar L , Guimaraens D , Romero LV . (1988) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealants. Contact Derm 18:129–32.

Condé-Salazar L , Guimaraens D , Romero LV , Gonzalez MA , Alomar A . (1986) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to artificial nails. Contact Derm 15:242.

Deichmann W . (1941) Toxicity of methyl, ethyl and n-butyl methacrylate. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 23:343–51.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1986) Health and environmental effects profile for ethyl methacrylate. EPA Report No. EPA/600/X-86/212. NTIS Order No. PB88-242375.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1985) OHM TADS (Oil and Hazardous Materials–Technical Assistance Data System). On-line.

Fisher AA . (1980) Cross reactions between methyl methacrylate monomer and acrylic monomers presently used in acrylic nail preparations. Contact Derm 6:345–7.

10.

Fitzgerald DA , English SC . (1994) Widespread contact dermatitis from sculptured nails. Contact Derm 30:118.

11.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (1994) Frequency of use of cosmetic ingredients. Computer printout. Washington, DC: FDA.

12.

Freeman FH . (1965) Dental materials. In: Standen A , ed. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 6, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 830–1.

13.

Guerra L , Vincenzi C , Peluso AM , Tosti A . (1993) Prevalence and sources of occupational contact sensitization to acrylates in Italy. Contact Derm 28:101–3.

14.

Haskell Laboratory for Toxicology and Industrial Medicine. (1977) Eye irritation test in rabbits. NTIS Publication Order No. OTS0520965.

15.

Hawley GG . (1971) The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 8th Ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 371.

16.

Hiipakka D , Samimi B . (1987) Exposure of acrylic fingernail sculptors to organic vapors and methacrylate dusts. Am Ind Hyg Assoc 48:230–7.

17.

Horna A , Taborsky J , Churacek J . (1986) Chromatography of monomers. V. Temperature-programmed glass capillary gas chromatographic separation and gas chromatography-mass spectrometric identification of a mixture of C1-C18 alkyl esters of acrylic and methacrylic acids. J Chromatogr 360:89–104.

18.

Kanerva L , Estlander T , Jolanki R . (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic acrylates. Contact Derm 20:201–11.

19.

Kanerva L , Estlander T , Jolanki R , Tarvainen K . (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses. Contact Derm 28:268–75.

20.

Lawrence WH , Autian J . (1972) Possible toxic effects from inhalation of dental ingredients by alteration of drug biologic half-life. J Dent Res 51:878.

21.

Lee HL, Orlowski JA. (1976) Polymeric compositions for coating, repairing and lengthening nails. Ger. Offen. Patent No. 2553138 (8/12/76). (CA 85:130366Q).

22.

Maibach H , Hjorth N , Fregert S , et al. (1978) Butyl methacrylate monomer and ethyl methacrylate monomer–frequency of reaction. Contact Derm 4:60.

23.

Marks JG , Bishop ME , Willis WF . (1979) Allergic contact dermatitis to sculptured nails. Arch Dermatol 115:100.

24.

Mir GN , Lawrence WH , Autian J . (1974) Toxicological and pharmacological actions of methacrylate monomers III. Effects on respiratory and cardiovascular functions of anesthetized dogs. J Pharm Sci 63:376–81.

25.

Mir GN , Lawrence WH , Autian J . (1973a) Toxicological and pharmacological actions of methacrylate monomers I. Effects on isolated, perfused rabbit heart. J Pharm Sci 62:778–82.

26.

Mir GN , Lawrence WH , Autian J . (1973) Toxicological and pharmacological actions of methacrylate monomers II. Effects on isolated guinea pig ileum. J Pharm Sci 62:1258–61.

27.

Montgomery L . (1989) Report on health hazards study of methacrylate and other plastics as embedding media: a project of the National Society for Histotechnology Health and Safety Committee. J Histotechnol 12:143–4.

28.

Moore MM , Amtower A , Doerr CL , Brock KH , Dearfield KL . (1988) Genotoxicity of acrylic acid, methyl aery late, ethyl aery late, methyl methacrylate, and ethyl methacrylate in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 11:49–63.

29.

Nemec JW , Kirch LS . (1981) Methacrylic acid and derivatives. In: Grayson M , Eckroth D , eds. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 15. 3rd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 346–77.

30.

Nikitakis JM , Mc Ewen GN , Wenninger JA , eds. (1991) CTFA International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, 4th Edition. Washington, DC: The Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association, 200.

31.

Oberly R , Tansy MF . (1985) LC50 values for rats acutely exposed to vapors of acrylic and methacrylic acid esters. J Toxicol Environ Health 16:811–22.

32.

Refojo MF . (1979) Contact lenses. In: Grayson M , Eckroth D , eds. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 6, 3rd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 723–4.

33.

Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). (1992) National Library of Medicine database.

34.

Savonius B , Keskinen H , Tuppurainen M , Kanerva L . (1993) Occupational respiratory disease caused by acrylates. Clin Exp Allergy 23:416–24.

35.

Schoon D. (1994a) Unpublished data submitted by the Nail Manufacturers Council. Differential scanning calorimeter determinations of residual monomer content in ethyl methacrylate fingernail formulations. (15 pages).^*

36.

Schoon D. (19946) Unpublished data submitted by the Nail Manufacturers Council. Addendum to: Differential scanning calorimeter determinations of residual monomer content in ethyl methacrylate fingernail formulations. (6 pages).^*

37.

Schoon D. (1994c) Unpublished data submitted by the Nail Manufacturers Council. Measurement of the cure temperature profile of ethyl methacrylate fingernail formulations. (7 pages).^*

38.

Singh AR , Lawrence WH , Autian J . (1972) Embryonic-fetal toxicity and teratogenic effects of a group of methacrylate esters in rats. J Dent Res 51:1632–8.

39.

Tanii H , Hashimoto K . (1982) Structure-toxicity relationship of acrylates and methacrylates. Toxicol Lett 11:125–9.

40.

Taylor JS . (1989) Acrylic reactions–ten years' experience. In: Frosch PJ , Dooms-Goossens A , Lachapelle JM , Rycroft RJG , Scheper RJ , eds. (1989) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 346–51.

41.

Tosti A , Guerra L , Bardazzi F . (1992) Occupational contact dermatitis from exposure to epoxy resins and acrylates. Clin Dermatol 10:133–40.

42.

U.S. District Court Decision. (1974) U.C. vs. C.E.B. Products, Inc. 380 Federal Suppl. 644 (N.D. 111., 1974).

43.

Van Der Walle HB , Bensink T . (1982) Cross reaction pattern of 26 acrylic monomers on guinea pig skin. Contact Derm 8:376–82.

44.

Van Der Walle HB , Klecak G , Geleick H , Bensink T . (1982) Sensitizing potential of 14 mono (meth) acrylates in the guinea pig. Contact Derm 8:223–35.

45.

Waegemaekers THJM , Bensink MPM . (1984) Non-mutagenicity of 27 aliphatic acrylate esters in the Salmonella-microsome test. Mutat Res 137:95–102.

46.

Wenninger JA , Mc Ewen GN Jr , eds. (1992) CTFA Cosmetic Ingredient Handbook, Second Edition. Washington, DC: The Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association, 150.

47.

Zeiger E , Anderson B , Haworth S , Lawlor T , Mortelmans K , Speck W . (1987) Salmonella mutagenicity test. III. Results from the testing of 255 chemicals. Environ Mutagen 9(suppl. 9): 1–110.