Evaluation of a New Reproductive Toxicology Protocol Using Diethylstilbestrol (DES) as a Positive Control Compound

Abstract

A new National Toxicology Program (NTP) reproductive toxicology assay designated Fertility Assessment by Continuous Breeding was evaluated using trans-diethylstilbestrol (DES) as a positive control compound. The testing scheme employs young adult CD-1 male and female mice and is comprised of 5 possible tasks: task 1, 14-day dose-finding (repeated or continuous dosing); task 2, continuous breeding; task 3, determination of affected sex; task 4, offspring assessment; task 5, hormone patterns. Only tasks 2 and 3 were performed in the present study. Task 2 employed dietary levels of 0, 1, 10, and 50 ppb DES (99% pure). Task 3 used the control and high dose parental mice from task 2 in a crossover mating trial (control x treated) to determine whether one or both sexes in the F₀ generation were adversely affected. Continuous exposure of F₀ mice to 50 ppb DES in the diet during task 2 significantly decreased (P < 0.01) the proportion of pairs that produced at least 1 litter as compared to pairs continuously exposed to dietary levels of 0, 1, and 10 ppb DES. In addition, continuous exposure to 50 ppb DES in the diet had a cumulative adverse effect on the production and viability of litters. Thus, the pairs fed 50 ppb DES produced significantly fewer litters (P < 0.01), had fewer live pups per litter (P < 0.01), and tended toward a lower proportion of pups born alive per litter than did pairs in the 0, 1, and 10 ppb DES groups. In the crossover mating trial (task 3) the proportion of F₀ females that mated (number with copulatory plugs/number cohabited) and that were fecund (number delivering litters/number with copulatory plugs) did not differ significantly among the 3 different combinations of paired mice. It was noted, however, that the proportion of cohabited F₀ females delivering litters (number delivering litters/number cohabited) was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the control male x 50 ppb DES female group vs. the control male x control female group. The proportion of cohabited F₀ females delivering litters in the 50 ppb DES male x control female group did not differ significantly from either of the above groups. Further, the number of live pups per litter and the proportion of pups born alive were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in the F₀ control male x 50 ppb DES female group than in the other 2 groups. The proportion of male pups born alive (males/total) and the live pup weights, however, did not differ significantly among the 3 combinations of paired mice. Collectively, these results indicated that DES interfered with ovulation, conception, pre- and postimplantational processes in female mice. Thus, this new assay readily discriminated DES as a reproductive toxicant in CD-1 mice.

References

1. Christian, M.S. (1983). Assessment of reproductive toxicity – “State of the art.” In: Assessment of Reproductive and Teratogenic Hazards. M.S. Christian , W.M. Galbraith , P. Voytek , and M.A. Mehlman (eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific, pp. 65–76.

2. Food and Drug Administration. (1966). Guidelines for Reproductive Studies for Safety Evaluation of Drugs for Human Use. Washington, D.C.

3. Hoar, R.M. (1984). Reproduction/teratology. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 4, S335–S340.

4. Barlow, S.M. , and Sullivan, F.M. (1982). Reproductive Hazards of Industrial Chemicals. New York, Academic Press, pp. 9–22.

5. Palmer, A.K. (1981). Regulatory requirements for reproductive toxicology: Theory and practice. In: Developmental Toxicology. C.A. Kimmel and J. Buelke-Sam (eds.). New York: Raven Press, pp. 259–287.

6. Kroes, R. , and Feron, V.J. (1984). General toxicity testing: Sense and non-sense, science and policy. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 4, S298–S308.

7. Lamb, J.C. IV. (1985). Reproductive toxicity testing: Evaluating and developing new testing systems. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 4, 0000.

8. Berky, J.J. (1977). Effect of diethylstilbestrol on C3H mouse reproductivity. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 3, A342.

9. Greenman, D.L. , Cernosek, S.F. , and Cernosek, M.G. (1977). Uterine, vaginal, and prolactin responses to dietary diethylstilbestrol in the mouse. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 3, A349–350.

10.

10. Greenman, D.L. , Dooley, K. , Breeden, C.R. , and Gass, G.H. (1977). Strain differences in the response of the mouse to diethylstilbestrol. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 3, 589–597.

11.

11. Greenman, D.L. , Delongchamp, R.R. , and Highman, B. (1979). Variability of response to diethylstilbestrol: A comparison of inbred with hybrid mice. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 5, 131–143.

12.

12. Conover, W.J. (1971). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York: Wiley, pp. 153–237.

13.

13. Neter, J. , and Wasserman, W. (1974). Applied Linear Statistical Models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., pp. 463–713.

14.

14. National Toxicology Program. (1983). Fiscal Year 1983 Annual Plan, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.: Public Health Service, pp. 196–210.

15.

15. Walpole, A.L. (1965). Non-steroidal agents inhibiting pituitary gonadotrophic function. In: Agents Affecting Fertility. C.R. Austin and J.S. Perry (eds.). London: Churchill, pp. 159–194.

16.

16. Kar, A.B. (1969). Non-steroidal antifertility agents interfering with different phases of reproduction in the female. J. Sci. Indust. Res. 28, 45–51.

17.

17. Lerner, L.J. (1969). The biology of nonsteroidal antifertility agents. In: Contraception: The Chemical Control of Fertility. D. Lednicer (ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., pp. 161–196.

18.

18. Emmens, C.W. (1970). Postcoital contraception. Br. Med. Bull. 26, 45–51.

19.

19. Mclachlan, J.A. (1977). Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol in mice: Toxicological studies. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2, 527–537.

20.

20. Mclachlan, J.A. , Newbold, R.R. , Shah, H.C. , Hogan, M.D. , and Dixon, R.L. (1982). Reduced fertility in female mice exposed transplacentally to diethylstilbestrol (DES). Cancer Res. 38, 364–371.

21.

21. Mclachlan, J.A. , Newbold, R.R. , and Bullock, B.D. (1980). Long-term effects on the female mouse genital tract associated with prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Cancer Res. 40, 3988–3999.

22.

22. Wardell, R.E. , Seegmiller, R.E. , and Bradshaw, W.S. (1982). Induction of prenatal toxicity in the rat by diethylstilbestrol, zeranol, 3,4,3′,4′-tetrachlorobiphenyl, cadmium, and lead. Teratology 26, 229–237.

23.

23. Mclachlan, J.A. , and Dixon, R.L. (1976). Transplacental toxicity of diethylstilbestrol: A special problem in safety evaluation. In: Advances in Modern Toxicology. M.A. Mehlman , R.E. Shapiro , and H. Blumenthal (eds.). New York: Halsted Press, Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 423–448.

24.

24. Mclachlan, J.A. , Newbold, R.R. , and Bullock, B. (1975). Reproductive tract lesions in male mice exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol. Science 192, 441–442.

25.

25. Newbold, R.R. , Tyrey, S. , Haney, A.F. , and Mclachlan, J.A. (1983). Developmentally arrested oviduct: A structural and functional defect in mice following prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Teratology 27, 417–426.

26.

26. Newbold, R.R. , Bullock, B.C. , and Mclachlan, J.A. (1983). Exposure to diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy permanently alters the ovary and oviduct. Biol. Reprod. 28, 735–744.