Objective: Deliberate exposure to motor vehicle exhaust gas has become the second most commonly used method of suicide in Australia. In an attempt to understand the factors contributing to the rise in popularity of this method, the psychosocial profiles, factors influencing method choice and circumstances of the act of self-harm were examined in a group of survivors.
Method: A cross-sectional cohort study of 30 patients presenting for hyperbaric oxygen treatment having survived deliberate exposure to car exhaust gas was undertaken. A structured clinical interview was administered together with scales measuring depression, hopelessness and suicidal intent. Daily assessment of mental state and cognitive function was performed.
Results: Factors common to the majority of subjects included male gender, age group of 20–50 years, and alcohol abuse. Relationship discord was the most common precipitating factor. Reasons given for choice of this method included the availability and accessibility of motor vehicles, painlessness, awareness that the method was lethal, knowledge of another person's successful suicide by this method and awareness of the method through media portrayal. Most of the cars used did not have engines fitted with catalytic converters, substantially increasing the risk of toxicity. Regret of the attempt, denial of further suicidal ideation after the event, and the absence of a suicide note were common findings. Most denied excessive time spent planning. The most common diagnosis in this group was adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Suicide intent scores were not high, inconsistent with the majority of patients being aware of the lethality of the method.
Conclusion: Sociodemographic findings resemble those of psychological autopsy studies of subjects completing suicide by this method. Survival in this group was due to failure of the method or unexpected discovery rather than patient factors. This population described the method as highly acceptable and accessible emphasising the urgent need for reduction of access to this means of suicide in Australia.
References
1.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.Causes of death, Australia. ABS catalogue number 3303.0. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1996.
2.
BaumePJMSuicide in Australia: do we really have a problem?Australian Journal of Education and Developmental Psychology1996; 13:3–39.
3.
CantorCHTurrellGBaumePJMAccess to means of suicide by young Australians. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1996.
4.
BaumePJMCantorCMcTaggartP.Suicides in Queensland 1990–95: a comprehensive study. Brisbane: Queensland Government Health Report, 1997.
5.
RoutleyV.Motor vehicle exhaust gassing in Australia: epidemiology and prevention. Report no. 139. Melbourne: Monash University Accident Research Centre, 1998.
6.
ShelefM.Unanticipated benefits of automotive emission control; reduction in fatalities by motor vehicle exhaust. Science and Total Environment1994; 146/147:93–101.
7.
LesterD.Changing rates of suicide by car exhaust in men and women in the United States after car exhaust was detoxified. Crisis1989; 10:164–168.
8.
RosenmanSJCar exhaust suicide: more can be done to prevent suicide by car exhaust, but where is the will?Medical Journal of Australia1997; 166:288–289.
9.
BurvillPWThe changing pattern of suicide by gassing in Australia, 1910–87: the role of natural gas and motor vehicles. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1989; 81:178–184.
10.
SegerDWelchL.Carbon monoxide controversies. Neuropsychologic testing, mechanism of toxicity, and hyperbaric oxygen. Annals of Emergency Medicine1994; 24:242–276.
11.
ThornSRTaberRLMendigurenIIClarkJMHardyKRFisherABDelayed neuropsychologic sequelae after carbon monoxide poisoning: prevention by treatment with hyperbaric oxygen. Annals of Emergency Medicine1995; 25:474.
12.
SmithJSBrandonS.Morbidity from acute carbon monoxide poisoning at three-year follow-up. British Medical Journal1973; 1:318–321.
13.
Newson-SmithJGHirschSRPsychiatric symptoms in self poisoning patients. Psychological Medicine1979; 9:493–500.
14.
CantorCHBaumePJMAccess to methods of suicide: what impact?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1998; 32:8–14.
15.
OstromMThorsonJErikssonA.Carbon monoxide suicide from car exhausts. Social Science and Medicine1996; 42:447–451.
16.
BeckATRushAJShawBFEmeryG.Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guildford Press, 1979.
17.
BeckATWeissmanALesterDTrexlerL.The measurement of pessimism: the Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology1974; 42:861–865.
18.
BeckATDevelopment of Suicide Intent Scales. In: Resnick HL. The Prediction of Suicide. New York: Charles Press, 1974:45–56.
19.
GunnelD.Reporting suicide. British Medical Journal1994; 308:1446–1447.
20.
SchmidtkeAHafnerH.The Werther effect after television films: new evidence for an old hypothesis. Psychological Medicine1988; 18:665–676.
21.
O'CarrollPWPotterLBSuicide contagion and the reporting of suicide: recommendations from a national workshop. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report1994; 43:9–17.
22.
MartinGBaumePJMMedia reporting guidelines. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1998.
23.
BaumePJMMcTaggartPCantorC.Suicide in Australia: epidemiology and impact. Suicide Research Bulletin1997; 1:1–8.
24.
CarringtonPJMoyerS.Gun control and suicide in Ontario. American Journal of Psychiatry1994; 151:606–608.
25.
WaggASAylwinSJBCatalytic converter and suicide risk. Lancet1993; 342:1295.
26.
ClarkeRVLesterD.Toxicity of car exhausts and opportunity for suicide: comparison between Britain and the United States. Journal of Epidemiological and Community Health1987; 41:114–120.