Objective: To explore how the commonsense understanding, that those with a mental illness are dangerous, is deployed in a small sample of print media.
Method: The print media sample was subjected to a discourse analysis informed by knowledge of media practices. Materials were read closely and references to mental illness were identified, classified and analysed.
Results: This non-sensational material was shown to provide repeated confirmations of the commonsense understanding that mental illnesses make people unpredictable and dangerous. Close study of the lead article suggested that it was written so that readers had to draw on such understandings to make sense of the account it presented.
Conclusion: The study challenges the notion that media present negative depictions of mental illnesses either because journalists are poorly informed or because ‘sensation sells’. It is concluded that media practices directed at engaging readers require the use of cases and a style of writing that forces readers to draw upon commonsense knowledge of mental illness to understand the text. It is argued that this is a deliberate effort to enlist readers as co-creators of the text and thereby increase their interest.
NunnallyJ.The communication of mental health information: a comparison of opinions of experts and the public with mass media presentations. Behavioral Science1957; 2:222–230.
2.
NunnallyJ.Popular conceptions of mental health: their development and change. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961.
3.
DayDMPageS.Portrayal of mental illness in Canadian newspapers. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry1986; 31:813–817.
4.
PhiloGHendersonLMcLaughlinG.Mass media representations of mental health/illness. Glasgow: Glasgow University Media Group, 1994.
5.
SignorelliN.The stigma of mental illness on television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media1989; 33:325–331.
6.
WahlOFRothR.Television images of mental illness: results of a metropolitan Washington media watch. Journal of Broadcasting1982; 26:599–605.
7.
WahlOF.Mass media images of mental illness: a review of the literature. Journal of Community Psychology1992; 20:343–352.
8.
BorinsteinAB.Public attitudes towards persons with mental illness. Health Affairs1992; 3:186–196.
9.
PhiloG.Media representations of mental health/illness: audience reception study. Glasgow: Glasgow University Media Group, 1994.
10.
MatasMel-GuebalyNHarperDGreenMPeterkinA.Mental illness and the media. Part II. Content analysis of press coverage of mental health topics. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry1986; 31:431–433.
11.
ShainREPhillipsJ.The stigma of mental illness: labelling and stereotyping in the news. In: WilkinsLPattersonP, eds. Risky business: communicating issues of science, risk and public policy. Westport CT: Greenwood Press, 1991:61–74.
12.
FruthLPadderudA.Portrayals of mental illness in daytime television serials. Journalism Quarterly1985; 62:384–387.
13.
HylerSEGabbardGOSchneiderI.Homicidal maniacs and narcissistic parasites: stigmatization of mentally ill persons in the movies. Hospital and Community Psychiatry1991; 42:1044–1048.
14.
ApplebyLWesselyS.Public attitudes to mental illness: the influence of the Hungerford Massacre. Medical Science Law1988; 28:291–295.
15.
MullenPE.The fear of the mentally ill: is this public attitude justified?New Zealand Medical Journal1991; 104:90–91.
16.
MonahanJ.Mental disorder and violent behaviour: perceptions and evidence. American Psychologist1992; 47:511–521.
17.
MulveyE.Assessing the evidence of a link between mental illness and violence. Hospital and Community Psychiatry1994; 45:663–668.
18.
MedveneLJBridgeRG.Using television to create more favourable attitudes toward community facilities for deinstitutionalized psychiatric patients. Journal of Applied Social Psychology1990; 20:1863–1878.
19.
MatasMel-GuebalyNPeterkinAGreenMHarperD.Mental illness and the media: an assessment of attitudes and communication. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry1985; 30:12–17.
20.
WahlOFAxelsonG.A note on news staff views of mental illness and its coverage. Journal of Community Psychiatry1985; 13:80–82.
21.
HainingP.The penny dreadful or, strange, horrid and sensational tales!London: V. Gollanz, 1975.
22.
HeatonJAWilsonNL.Tuning in trouble. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1995.
23.
FoucaultM.Madness and civilisation: a history of insanity in the age of reason. (HowardR, trans.) New York: Random House, 1965.
24.
GilbertGNMulkayM.Opening Pandora's box: a sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
25.
PotterJWetherellM.Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage, 1987.
26.
FowlerR.Language in the news. London: Routledge, 1991.
27.
GraceGW.The linguistic construction of reality. London: Croon Helm, 1987.
FaircloughN.Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
30.
KressG.Against arbitrariness: the social production of the sign. Discourse and Society1993; 4:169–191.
31.
NairnRGMcCreanorTN.Insensitivity and hypersensitivity: an imbalance in Pakeha accounts of racial conflict. Journal of Language and Social Psychology1990; 9:293–308.
32.
NairnRGMcCreanorTN.Race talk and common sense: patterns in Pakeha discourse on Maori/Pakeha relations in New Zealand. Journal of Language and Social Psychology1991; 10:245–262.
33.
HollwayW.Subjectivity and method in psychology: gender, meaning and science. London: Sage, 1989.
34.
UllahP.Rhetoric and ideology in social identification: the case of second generation Irish youths. Discourse and Society1990; 1:167–188.
35.
EricsonRVBaranekPMChanJBL.Visualising deviance: a study of news organization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1987.
36.
AtkinsonJ.The ‘Americanisation’ of One Network News. Australasian Journal of American Studies1994; 13:1–26.
37.
GraberDA.The infotainment quotient in routine television news: a director's perspective. Discourse and Society1994; 5:483–508.
38.
MartinYBoothP.Special report on mental health. Auckland City Harbour News, 19 and 26 March 1993.
39.
FiskeSTTaylorSE.Social cognition. New York: Random House, 1984.
40.
AdamsP.A rhetoric of mysticism. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree. Auckland: University of Auckland, 1991.
41.
Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992. Wellington: New Zealand Government Printers, 1992.
42.
FrancellEGJr.What mental illness needs: public education and a new name. Hospital and Community Psychiatry1994; 45:409.