Objective: The mobile intensive treatment team (MITT) of the Valley Integrated Adult Mental Health Service in Brisbane, Australia, aims to provide services in the community to people with severe and persistent mental illness who have traditionally been heavily reliant on inpatient services (i.e. heavy service users). The MITT screening instrument (MITTSI) was developed to provide an objective measure to appropriately identify patients for referral to the service.
Method: A literature review and a panel of multidisciplinary clinicians were consulted to identify a list of specific attributes that would assist in the detection of heavy service users. These attributes were then formulated into an easy-to-administer screening instrument entitled the MITTSI. The MITTSI was administered in an interview format to MITT case managers (intensive case management) and to case managers in standard case management with prospective MITT patients (prospective heavy service users).
Results: Analyses of the responses indicated support for the MITTSI as a valid screening instrument in identifying heavy service users and for determining appropriate patients for referral to the MITT.
Conclusion: The MITTSI is an easy-to-administer screening instrument which provides clear guidelines for inclusion and exclusion, and is an objective measure regarding the patients' urgency for referral to the MITT. Follow-up of the MIITSI within a broader, longer-term project will attempt to further refine the MITTSI and to further determine its validity. Outcomes will be published at a later stage.
KentSFogartyMYellowleesP.A review of studies of heavy users of psychiatric services. Psychiatric Services1995; 46:1247–1253.
2.
QunlivanRHoughRCrowellABeachCHofstetterRKenworthyK.Service utilization and costs of care for severely mentally ill patients in an intensive case management program. Psychiatric Services1995; 46:365–371.
3.
HoultJRosenAReynoldsI.Community oriented treatment compared to psychiatric hospital oriented treatment. Social Science and, Medicine1984; 18:1005–1010.
4.
DharwadkarN.Effectiveness of an assertive outreach community treatment program. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1994; 28:244–249.
5.
TeesonMHambridgeJ.Mobile community treatment in inner city and suburban Sydney. Psychiatric Quarterly1992; 3:119–127.
6.
HambridgeJRosenA.Assertive community treatment for the seriously mentally ill in suburban Sydney: a programme description and evaluation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1994; 28:438–445.
7.
BondGRMillerLDKrumwiedMHAWardRSAssertive case management in three CMHCs: a controlled study. Hospital and Community Psychiatry1988; 39:411–418.
8.
TestMATraining in community living. In: LibermanRP, ed. Handbook of psychiatric rehabilitation. New York: MacMillan, 1992.
9.
TestMASteinLITraining in community living: one-year evaluation. American Journal of Psychiatry1976; 133:917–918.
10.
BurnsBJSantosABAssertive community treatment: an update of randomized trials. Psychiatric Services1995; 46:669–675.
11.
WoodKAndersonJ.The effect on hospital admissions of psychiatric case management involving general practitioners: preliminary results. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1994; 28:223–229.
12.
CasperEJPastvaG.Admission histories, patterns and subgroups of the heavy service users of a state psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Quarterly1990; 61:121–135.
13.
LavikNJUtilization of mental health services over a given period. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1983; 67:404–413.
14.
KentSFogartyMYellowleesP.Heavy utilisation of inpatient and outpatient services in a public mental health service. Psychiatric Services1995; 46:1254–1257.
15.
KentSYellowleesP.Psychiatric and social reasons for frequent rehospitalisations. Hospital and Community Psychiatry1995; 45:347–350.
16.
KentSYellowleesP.The relationship between social factors and frequent use of psychiatric services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1994; 29:403–408.
17.
McGurrinMCWorleyN.Evaluation of intensive case management for seriously and persistently mentally ill persons. Journal of Case Management1993, 2:59–65.
18.
BallisJ.Mobile intensive treatment team implementation and review. Consultant report. Brisbane: Queensland Health Mental Health Branch, 1996.
19.
TeesonMBuhrichN.Prevalence of schizophrenia in a refuge for homeless men: a five year follow-up. Psychiatric Bulletin1990; 14:597–600.
20.
MercierC.Improving the quality of life of people with severe mental disorders. Social Indicators Research1994; 33:165–192.
21.
HuxleyPWarnerR.Case management, quality of life and satisfaction with services of long-term psychiatric patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry1992; 43:799–802.
22.
JerrellJMRidgleyMSEvaluating changes in symptoms and functioning of dually diagnosed patients in specialised treatment. Psychiatric Services1995; 46:233–238.
23.
WolffNHelminiakTWDiamondRJEstimated societal costs of assertive community mental health care. Psychiatric Services1995; 46:898–906.
24.
NealeMSRosenheckRATherapeutic alliance and outcome in a VA intensive case management program. Psychiatric Services1995, 46:719–721.