The opening of a new high river bridge in Brisbane allowed a naturalistic experimental testing of whether the sample engaging in suicidal behaviour from the new bridge was similar to that from the adjoining older bridge. Substantial differences were found for the two samples. This suggests that persons prevented from jumping from one bridge, for example by a barrier, will not automatically jump from the alternative bridge although a minority may do so.
References
1.
SeidenRH. A tale of two bridges: comparative suicide incidence on the Golden Gate and San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridges. Omega1983; 14: 201–209.
2.
HarveyPMSolomonsBJ. Survival after free falls of 59 metres into water from the Sydney Harbour Bridge, 1930–1982. Medical Journal of Australia1983; 1: 504–511.
3.
KreitmanN. The coal gas story. U.K. Suicide rates 1960–71. British Journal of Preventative and Social Medicine1976; 30: 86–93.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Deaths due to suicide: Brisbane Statistical Division1966–1986. By request.
5.
CantorCHHillMAMcLachlanEK. Suicide from River Bridges — A Clinical Perspective. British Journal of Psychiatry1989; 15: 829–835.
6.
HawtonK. Assessment of suicide risk. British Journal of Psychiatry1987; 150: 145–153.
7.
GoldneyRDBurvillPW. Trends in suicidal behaviour and its management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1980; 14: 1–15.
