A survey of the mental health information literature available in NSW was made using the Flesch Formula for Reading Ease. It was found that ten out of thirteen were written at a level of complexity unintelligible to up to 60% of the general public. The literature is therefore falling far short of its potential. It is recommended that a serious attempt be made to write pamphlets in Plain English style. This process should include a Reading Ease estimation.
References
1.
FleschR. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology1948; 32: 221–233
2.
DaleE.ChallJS. A formula for predicting readability: instructions. Educational Research Bulletin1948; 27: 37–54
3.
BormufhJR. Readability: a new approach. Reading Research Quarterly1966; 1: 79–132
4.
StewartA. The design of print for health education — principles for communication. In: Health Education and the Media. LeatherDS (eds). Pergamon1985
5.
RumelhartDEOrtonyA. In: AndersonAC (eds). Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates1977
6.
LeyP. Improving satisfaction, understanding, memory and compliance. In: BroomeA (ed). Health psychology. Croom Helm1989
7.
KlareGR. The Measurement of readability. Iowa State University Press1963
8.
GillilandJ. Readability. University of London Press1972
9.
ManningD. Writing readable health messages. Public Health Reports, 1981; 96(5):464–465
10.
LeyP. The measurement of comprehensibility. Journal of the Institute of Health Education1973; 11: 17–20
11.
EaglesonJ. Legislation, legal rights and plain English. Law Reform Commission of Victoria1986. Discussion Paper 1
12.
HatfieldA. What families want of family therapists. In: McFarlaneWR (ed) Family therapy in schizophrenia. Guilford, New York1983
13.
DavisonALimitations of readability formulas in guiding adaptation of text. University of Illinois, Centre for the Study of Reading
