There is an increasing concern about potential negligence actions being issued against psychiatrists. This has resulted from a greater interest by the community in the issues of informed consent and involuntary hospitalisation. This paper gives an overview of the present law relating to negligence relevant to the treating psychiatrist. Traditional views in the areas of contract and tort, with some comments on the current changes in that law, are described.
References
1.
The Freedom of Information Act, Victoria (1982).
2.
SlawsonP. F.GuggenheimF. G.Psychiatric malpractice. A review of the national loss experience, American Journal of Psychiatry414, 1984, 979–81.
3.
LanphierPhipos (1838) 8 C & P 475.
4.
Selfe v Ilford and District Hospital. Reported in The Times, 26 November 1970.
5.
Haines v Bellisimo (1978) 2 D.L.R. (3rd) 215.
6.
Landau v Werna (1961) 105 S.J. 1008.
7.
Landau v Werna, affirmed, (1961) 105 S.J. 257.
8.
Bolam v Frien Hospital Management Committee (1975) 1 W.L.R. 582.
9.
Chatterton v Gerson (1980) 3 W.L.R. 1003.
10.
Cassidy v Minister of Health (1951) 2 K.B. 343.
11.
Kondis v State Transport Authority — unreported, High Court of Australia, 16 October 1984.
12.
Whitehouse v Jordan (1980) 1 All E.R. 650.
13.
A methodology for preparing ‘ideal’ treatment outlines in Psychiatry.The Quality Assurance Project. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry16, 1982, 153–60.
