Bandeira de MelloV.RahmanT.FoxM. A.JiC. S. (2019). Mapping state proficiency standards onto the NAEP Scales: Results from the 2017 NAEP reading and mathematics assessments (NCES 2019-040). Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/studies/pdf/2019040.pdf
3.
BoltD. (2021). Commentary on Reardon, Kalogrides, and Ho's “Validation methods for aggregate-level test scale linking: A case study mapping school district test score distributions to a common scale.”Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 46(2), 168–172.
BraunH. I.QianJ. (2007). An enhanced method for mapping state standards onto the NAEP Scale. In DoransN. J.PommerichM.HollandP. W. (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 313–338). Springer.
6.
DavisonM. L. (2021). Commentary on “Validation methods for aggregate-level test scale linking: A case study mapping school district test score distributions to a common scale.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 46(2), 173–186.
7.
HaertelE. H.HoA. D. (2016). Fairness using derived scores. In DoransN.CookL. (Eds.), Fairness in educational assessment and measurement (pp. 217–237). Routledge.
KoretzD. (2007). Using aggregate-level linkages for estimation and validation: Comments on Thissen and Braun & Qian. In: DoransN. J.PommerichM.HollandP. W. (eds.) Linking and aligning scores and scales. Statistics for social and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49771-6_18
10.
McLaughlinD.Bandeira de MelloV. (2005). How to compare NAEP and state assessment results. Paper presented at the annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.
11.
MosesT.DoransN. J. (2021). Aggregate-level test-scale linking: A new solution for an old problem?Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 46(2), 187–202.
12.
ReardonS. F.KalogridesD.HoA. D. (2021). Validation methods for aggregate-level test scale linking: A case study mapping school district test score distributions to a common scale. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 46(2), 138–167.
13.
ReardonS. F.ShearB. R.CastellanoK. E.HoA. D. (2017). Using heteroskedastic ordered probit models to recover moments of continuous test score distributions from coarsened data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42, 3–45.
14.
ThissenD. (2007). Linking assessments based on aggregate reporting: Background and issues. In DoransN. J.PommerichM.HollandP. W. (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 287–312). Springer.
15.
von DavierA. (2021). Commentary on “Validation methods for aggregate-level test scale linking: A case study mapping school district test score distributions to a common scale.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 46(2), 203–208.