Obtaining Interpretable Parameters From Reparameterized Longitudinal Models: Transformation Matrices Between Growth Factors in Two Parameter Spaces

Abstract

This study proposes transformation functions and matrices between coefficients in the original and reparameterized parameter spaces for an existing linear-linear piecewise model to derive the interpretable coefficients directly related to the underlying change pattern. Additionally, the study extends the existing model to allow individual measurement occasions and investigates predictors for individual differences in change patterns. We present the proposed methods with simulation studies and a real-world data analysis. Our simulation study demonstrates that the method can generally provide an unbiased and accurate point estimate and appropriate confidence interval coverage for each parameter. The empirical analysis shows that the model can estimate the growth factor coefficients and path coefficients directly related to the underlying developmental process, thereby providing meaningful interpretation.

Keywords

linear spline growth models unknown knots individual measurement occasions time-invariant covariates simulation studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauer

D. J.

(2003). Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28(2), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986028002135

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 338–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338

Biesanz

J. C.

Deeb-Sossa

Papadakis

A. A.

Bollen

K. A.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.30

Boker

S. M.

Neale

M. C.

Maes

H. H.

Wilde

M. J.

Spiegel

Brick

T. R.

Estabrook

Bates

T. C.

Mehta

von Oertzen

Gore

R. J.

Hunter

M. D.

Hackett

D. C.

Karch

Brandmaier

A. M.

Pritikin

J. N.

Zahery

Kirkpatrick

R. M.

(2020). Openmx 2.17.2 user guide. https://vipbg.vcu.edu/vipbg/OpenMx2/docs/OpenMx/2.17.2/OpenMxUserGuide.pdf

Bollen

K. A.

Curran

P. J.

(2005). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Browne

M. W.

du Toit

S. H. C.

(1991). Models for learning data. In Collins

L. M.

Horn

J. L.

(Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 47–68). American Psychological Association.

Chou

C.-P.

Yang

Pentz

M. A.

Hser

Y. I.

(2004). Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00149-X

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cook

N. R.

Ware

J. H.

(1983). Design and analysis methods for longitudinal research. Annual Review of Public Health, 4(1), 1–23.

10.

Coulombe

Selig

J. P.

Delaney

H. D.

(2015). Ignoring individual differences in times of assessment in growth curve modeling. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415577684

11.

Cudeck

du Toit

S. H. C.

(2003). Nonlinear multilevel models for repeated measures data. In Reise

S. P.

Duan

(Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 1–24). Psychology Press.

12.

Cudeck

Harring

J. R.

(2010). Developing a random coefficient model for nonlinear repeated measures data. In Chow

S.-M.

Ferrer

Hsieh

(Eds.), The notre dame series on quantitative methodology. Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 289–318). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

13.

Cudeck

Klebe

K. J.

(2002). Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.41

14.

Curran

P. J.

(2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38(4), 529–569. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5

15.

Dominicus

Ripatti

Pedersen

N. L.

Palmgren

(2008). A random change point model for assessing variability in repeated measures of cognitive function. Statistics in Medicine, 27(27), 5786–5798. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3380

16.

Dumenci

Perera

R. A.

Keefe

F. J.

Ang

D. C.

Slover

Jensen

M. P.

Riddle

D. L.

(2019). Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 27(6), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.004

17.

Du Toit

S. H. C.

Cudeck

(2009). Estimation of the nonlinear random coefficient model when some random effects are separable. Psychometrika, 74, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9107-7

18.

Finkel

Reynolds

Mcardle

Gatz

Pedersen

N. L.

(2003). Latent growth curve analyses of accelerating decline in cognitive abilities in late adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 39, 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.535

19.

Flora

D. B.

(2008). Specifying piecewise latent trajectory models for longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802154349

20.

Grimm

K. J.

Ram

Estabrook

(2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. Guilford Press.

21.

Hancock

G. R.

Kuo

W. L.

Lawrence

F. R.

(2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 470–489.

22.

Harring

J. R.

Cudeck

du Toit

S. H. C.

(2006). Fitting partially nonlinear random coefficient models as sems. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_7

23.

Hedeker

Mermelstein

R. J.

Flay

B. R.

(2006). Application of item response theory models for intensive longitudinal data. In Walls

T. A.

Schafer

J. L.

(Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 84–108). Oxford University Press.

24.

Hunter

M. D.

(2018). State space modeling in an open source, modular, structural equation modeling environment. Structural Equation Modeling, 25(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1369354

25.

Kohli

(2011). Estimating unknown knots in piecewise linear-linear latent growth mixture models [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland]. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/11973

26.

Kohli

Harring

J. R.

(2013). Modeling growth in latent variables using a piecewise function. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.778191

27.

Kohli

Harring

J. R.

Hancock

G. R.

(2013). Piecewise linear-linear latent growth mixture models with unknown knots. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413496812

28.

Kohli

Harring

J. R.

Zopluoglu

(2016). A finite mixture of nonlinear random coefficient models for continuous repeated measures data. Psychometrika, 81(3), 851–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9462-0

29.

Kohli

Hughes

Wang

Zopluoglu

Davison

M. L.

(2015). Fitting a linear-linear piecewise growth mixture model with unknown knots: A comparison of two common approaches to inference. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000034

30.

Kohli

Sullivan

A. L.

Sadeh

Zopluoglu

(2015). Longitudinal mathematics development of students with learning disabilities and students without disabilities: A comparison of linear, quadratic, and piecewise linear mixed effects models. Journal of School Psychology, 53(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.002

31.

Kwok

Luo

West

S. G.

(2010). Using modification indexes to detect turning points in longitudinal data: A monte carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(2), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659359

32.

Lê

Norman

Tourangeau

Brick

J. M.

Mulligan

(2011). Early childhood longitudinal study: Kindergarten class of 2010-2011—Sample design issues. JSM Proceedings 2011, 1629–1639. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2011/Files/301090_66141.pdf

33.

Lehmann

E. L.

Casella

(1998). Theory of point estimation (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag, Inc.

34.

Duncan

T. E.

Duncan

S. C.

Hops

(2001). Piecewise growth mixture modeling of adolescent alcohol use data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_2

35.

Liu

(2019). Estimating knots in bilinear spline growth models with time-invariant covariates in the framework of individual measurement occasions [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University]. https://doi.org/10.25772/9WDR-9R85

36.

Lock

E. F.

Kohli

Bose

(2018). Detecting multiple random changepoints in Bayesian piecewise growth mixture models. Psychometrika, 83(3), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9594-5

37.

Marcoulides

K. M.

(2018). Automated latent growth curve model fitting: A segmentation and knot selection approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1424548

38.

McArdle

J. J.

(1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In Nesselroade

Cattell

(Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561–614). Springer.

39.

McArdle

J. J.

Wang

(2008). Modeling age-based turning points in longitudinal life-span growth curves of cognition. In Cohen

(Ed.), Applied data analytic techniques for turning points research (pp. 1–24). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

40.

Mehta

P. D.

Neale

M. C.

(2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259

41.

Mehta

P. D.

West

S. G.

(2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.5.1.23

42.

Morris

T. P.

White

I. R.

Crowther

M. J.

(2019). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine, 38(11), 2074–2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8086

43.

Muniz Terrera

van den Hout

Matthews

F. E.

(2011). Random change point models: Investigating cognitive decline in the presence of missing data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(4), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760903563668

44.

Neale

M. C.

Hunter

M. D.

Pritikin

J. N.

Zahery

Brick

T. R.

Kirkpatrick

R. M.

Estabrook

Bates

T. C.

Maes

H. H.

Boker

S. M.

(2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81(2), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8

45.

Preacher

K. J.

Hancock

G. R.

(2012). On interpretable reparameterizations of linear and nonlinear latent growth curve models. In Harring

J. R.

Hancock

G. R.

(Eds.), Cilvr series on latent variable methodology. Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 25–58). IAP Information Age Publishing.

46.

Preacher

K. J.

Hancock

G. R.

(2015). Meaningful aspects of change as novel random coefficients: A general method for reparameterizing longitudinal models. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000028

47.

Pritikin

J. N.

Hunter

M. D.

Boker

S. M.

(2015). Modular open-source software for item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(3), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414554615

48.

Riddle

D. L.

Perera

R. A.

Jiranek

W. A.

Dumenci

(2015). Using surgical appropriateness criteria to examine outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in a united states sample. Arthritis Care & Research, 67(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22428

49.

Seber

G. A. F.

Wild

C. J.

(2003). Nonlinear regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

50.

Sterba

S. K.

(2014). Fitting nonlinear latent growth curve models with individually varying time points. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919828

51.

Sullivan

A. L.

Kohli

Farnsworth

E. M.

Sadeh

Jones

(2017). Longitudinal models of reading achievement of students with learning disabilities and without disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 32(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000170

52.

Tishler

Zang

(1981). A maximum likelihood method for piecewise regression models with a continuous dependent variable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C. Applied Statistics, 30, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287599

53.

Venables

W. N.

Ripley

B. D.

(2002). Modern applied statistics with s (4th ed.). Springer.

54.

Wang

McArdle

J. J.

(2008). A simulation study comparison of Bayesian estimation with conventional methods for estimating unknown change points. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758265

55.

Zopluoglu

Harring

J. R.

Kohli

(2014). Fitpmm: An r routine to fit finite mixtures of piecewise mixed-effects models with unknown random knots. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 583–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621614540482

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

0.12 MB