This study proposes transformation functions and matrices between coefficients in the original and reparameterized parameter spaces for an existing linear-linear piecewise model to derive the interpretable coefficients directly related to the underlying change pattern. Additionally, the study extends the existing model to allow individual measurement occasions and investigates predictors for individual differences in change patterns. We present the proposed methods with simulation studies and a real-world data analysis. Our simulation study demonstrates that the method can generally provide an unbiased and accurate point estimate and appropriate confidence interval coverage for each parameter. The empirical analysis shows that the model can estimate the growth factor coefficients and path coefficients directly related to the underlying developmental process, thereby providing meaningful interpretation.
BauerD. J. (2003). Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28(2), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986028002135
2.
BauerD. J.CurranP. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 338–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338
3.
BiesanzJ. C.Deeb-SossaN.PapadakisA. A.BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.30
4.
BokerS. M.NealeM. C.MaesH. H.WildeM. J.SpiegelM.BrickT. R.EstabrookR.BatesT. C.MehtaP.von OertzenT.GoreR. J.HunterM. D.HackettD. C.KarchJ.BrandmaierA. M.PritikinJ. N.ZaheryM.KirkpatrickR. M. (2020). Openmx 2.17.2 user guide. https://vipbg.vcu.edu/vipbg/OpenMx2/docs/OpenMx/2.17.2/OpenMxUserGuide.pdf
5.
BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2005). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6.
BrowneM. W.du ToitS. H. C. (1991). Models for learning data. In CollinsL. M.HornJ. L. (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 47–68). American Psychological Association.
7.
ChouC.-P.YangD.PentzM. A.HserY. I. (2004). Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00149-X
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
CookN. R.WareJ. H. (1983). Design and analysis methods for longitudinal research. Annual Review of Public Health, 4(1), 1–23.
10.
CoulombeP.SeligJ. P.DelaneyH. D. (2015). Ignoring individual differences in times of assessment in growth curve modeling. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415577684
11.
CudeckR.du ToitS. H. C. (2003). Nonlinear multilevel models for repeated measures data. In ReiseS. P.DuanN. (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 1–24). Psychology Press.
12.
CudeckR.HarringJ. R. (2010). Developing a random coefficient model for nonlinear repeated measures data. In ChowS.-M.FerrerE.HsiehF. (Eds.), The notre dame series on quantitative methodology. Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 289–318). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
13.
CudeckR.KlebeK. J. (2002). Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.41
14.
CurranP. J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38(4), 529–569. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_5
15.
DominicusA.RipattiS.PedersenN. L.PalmgrenJ. (2008). A random change point model for assessing variability in repeated measures of cognitive function. Statistics in Medicine, 27(27), 5786–5798. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3380
16.
DumenciL.PereraR. A.KeefeF. J.AngD. C.SloverJ.JensenM. P.RiddleD. L. (2019). Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 27(6), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.004
17.
Du ToitS. H. C.CudeckR. (2009). Estimation of the nonlinear random coefficient model when some random effects are separable. Psychometrika, 74, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9107-7
18.
FinkelD.ReynoldsC.McardleJ.GatzM.PedersenN. L. (2003). Latent growth curve analyses of accelerating decline in cognitive abilities in late adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 39, 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.535
19.
FloraD. B. (2008). Specifying piecewise latent trajectory models for longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802154349
HancockG. R.KuoW. L.LawrenceF. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 470–489.
22.
HarringJ. R.CudeckR.du ToitS. H. C. (2006). Fitting partially nonlinear random coefficient models as sems. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_7
23.
HedekerD.MermelsteinR. J.FlayB. R. (2006). Application of item response theory models for intensive longitudinal data. In WallsT. A.SchaferJ. L. (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 84–108). Oxford University Press.
24.
HunterM. D. (2018). State space modeling in an open source, modular, structural equation modeling environment. Structural Equation Modeling, 25(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1369354
25.
KohliN. (2011). Estimating unknown knots in piecewise linear-linear latent growth mixture models [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland]. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/11973
26.
KohliN.HarringJ. R. (2013). Modeling growth in latent variables using a piecewise function. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.778191
27.
KohliN.HarringJ. R.HancockG. R. (2013). Piecewise linear-linear latent growth mixture models with unknown knots. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413496812
28.
KohliN.HarringJ. R.ZopluogluC. (2016). A finite mixture of nonlinear random coefficient models for continuous repeated measures data. Psychometrika, 81(3), 851–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9462-0
29.
KohliN.HughesJ.WangC.ZopluogluC.DavisonM. L. (2015). Fitting a linear-linear piecewise growth mixture model with unknown knots: A comparison of two common approaches to inference. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000034
30.
KohliN.SullivanA. L.SadehS.ZopluogluC. (2015). Longitudinal mathematics development of students with learning disabilities and students without disabilities: A comparison of linear, quadratic, and piecewise linear mixed effects models. Journal of School Psychology, 53(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.002
31.
KwokO.LuoW.WestS. G. (2010). Using modification indexes to detect turning points in longitudinal data: A monte carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(2), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659359
LehmannE. L.CasellaG. (1998). Theory of point estimation (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag, Inc.
34.
LiF.DuncanT. E.DuncanS. C.HopsH. (2001). Piecewise growth mixture modeling of adolescent alcohol use data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_2
35.
LiuJ. (2019). Estimating knots in bilinear spline growth models with time-invariant covariates in the framework of individual measurement occasions [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University]. https://doi.org/10.25772/9WDR-9R85
36.
LockE. F.KohliN.BoseM. (2018). Detecting multiple random changepoints in Bayesian piecewise growth mixture models. Psychometrika, 83(3), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9594-5
37.
MarcoulidesK. M. (2018). Automated latent growth curve model fitting: A segmentation and knot selection approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1424548
38.
McArdleJ. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In NesselroadeJ.CattellR. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561–614). Springer.
39.
McArdleJ. J.WangL. (2008). Modeling age-based turning points in longitudinal life-span growth curves of cognition. In CohenP. (Ed.), Applied data analytic techniques for turning points research (pp. 1–24). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
40.
MehtaP. D.NealeM. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259
41.
MehtaP. D.WestS. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.5.1.23
42.
MorrisT. P.WhiteI. R.CrowtherM. J. (2019). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine, 38(11), 2074–2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8086
43.
Muniz TerreraG.van den HoutA.MatthewsF. E. (2011). Random change point models: Investigating cognitive decline in the presence of missing data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(4), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760903563668
PreacherK. J.HancockG. R. (2012). On interpretable reparameterizations of linear and nonlinear latent growth curve models. In HarringJ. R.HancockG. R. (Eds.), Cilvr series on latent variable methodology. Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 25–58). IAP Information Age Publishing.
46.
PreacherK. J.HancockG. R. (2015). Meaningful aspects of change as novel random coefficients: A general method for reparameterizing longitudinal models. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000028
47.
PritikinJ. N.HunterM. D.BokerS. M. (2015). Modular open-source software for item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(3), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414554615
48.
RiddleD. L.PereraR. A.JiranekW. A.DumenciL. (2015). Using surgical appropriateness criteria to examine outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in a united states sample. Arthritis Care & Research, 67(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22428
49.
SeberG. A. F.WildC. J. (2003). Nonlinear regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
50.
SterbaS. K. (2014). Fitting nonlinear latent growth curve models with individually varying time points. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919828
51.
SullivanA. L.KohliN.FarnsworthE. M.SadehS.JonesL. (2017). Longitudinal models of reading achievement of students with learning disabilities and without disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 32(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000170
52.
TishlerA.ZangI. (1981). A maximum likelihood method for piecewise regression models with a continuous dependent variable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C. Applied Statistics, 30, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287599
53.
VenablesW. N.RipleyB. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with s (4th ed.). Springer.
54.
WangL.McArdleJ. J. (2008). A simulation study comparison of Bayesian estimation with conventional methods for estimating unknown change points. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758265
55.
ZopluogluC.HarringJ. R.KohliN. (2014). Fitpmm: An r routine to fit finite mixtures of piecewise mixed-effects models with unknown random knots. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 583–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621614540482
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
