AustinP. C.JembereN.ChiuM. (2016). Propensity score matching and complex surveys. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. doi:10.117/0962280216658920
2.
DongN. (2015). Using propensity score methods to approximate factorial experimental designs to analyze the relationship between two variables and an outcome. American Journal of Evaluation, 36, 42–66. doi:10.1177/1098214014553261
3.
EgamiN.ImaiK. (2018). Causal interaction in factorial experiments: Application to conjoint analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01621459.2018.1476246
4.
HongG. (2015). Causality in a social world: Moderation, mediation, and spill-over. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
LenisD.NguyenT. Q.DongN.StuartE. A. (2017). It’s all about balance: Propensity score matching in the context of complex survey data. Biostatistics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx063
6.
NeymanJ. (1923/1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Translated inStatistical Science, 5, 465–472.
7.
RidgewayG.KovalchikS. A.GriffinB. A.KabetoM. U. (2015). Propensity score analysis with survey weighted data. Journal of Causal Inference, 3, 237–249. doi:10.1515/jci-2014-0039
8.
RubinD. B. (1980). Discussion of “randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test” by Basu. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591–593.
9.
WeissM. J.BloomH. S.BrockT. (2014). A conceptual framework for studying the sources of variation in program effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3, 778–808.
10.
ZanuttoE. L.LuB.HornikR. (2005). Using propensity score subclassification for multiple treatment doses to evaluate a national anti-drug media campaign. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30, 59–73.