In education research, social network analysis is being widely used to study different interactions and their overall implications. Recently, there has also been a surge in the development of software tools to implement social network analysis. In this article, we review two popular R packages, igraph and statnet suite, in the context of network summarization and modeling. We discuss different aspects of these packages and demonstrate some of their functionalities by analyzing a friendship network of lawyers. Finally, we end with recommendations for using these packages along with pointers to additional resources for network analysis in R.
AdhikariS.DabbsB.JunkerB.SadinleM.SweetT.ThomasA. (2015), CIDnetworks: Generative models for complex networks with conditionally independent dyadic structure(R package version 0.8.1). Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CIDnetworks
2.
AdhikariS.JunkerB.SweetT.ThomasA. C.AdhikariM. S.ByteCompileT. (2016). HLSM: Hierarchical Latent Space Network Model (HLSM), R Package Version 0.6. Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=HLSM
3.
BarabásiA.-L.AlbertR. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.
ButtsC. T. (2008). Social network analysis with sna. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1–51.
6.
ClausetA.NewmanM. E.MooreC. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70, 066111.
7.
CsardiG.NepuszT. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695, 1–9.
8.
DabbsB.AdhikariS.SadinleM.JunkerB. W.SweetT. M.ThomasA. C. (in press). Conditionally independent network models.
9.
DavidsonE. H.ErwinD. H. (2006). Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science, 311, 796–800.
10.
FienbergS. E. (2012). A brief history of statistical models for network analysis and open challenges. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 21, 825–839.
11.
FrankO.StraussD. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 832–842.
12.
FruchtermanT. M. J.ReingoldE. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software-Practice and Experience, 21, 1129–1164.
13.
GirvanM.NewmanM. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7821–7826.
14.
GoldenbergA.ZhengA. X.FienbergS. E.AiroldiE. M. (2010). A survey of statistical network models. Foundation and Trends in Machine Learning, 2, 129–233.
15.
HandcockM. S.HunterD. R.ButtsC. T.GoodreauS. M.MorrisM. (2008). statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1548.
16.
HandcockM. S.RafteryA. E.TantrumJ. M. (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170, 301–354.
17.
HandcockM. S.RobinsG.SnijdersT. A.MoodyJ.BesagJ. (2003). Assessing degeneracy in statistical models of social networks. Working Paper 39. Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle. Retrieved fromhttp://www.csss.washington.edu/Papers/
18.
HaynieD. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.
19.
HendersonJ. A.RobinsonP. A. (2011). Geometric effects on complex network structure in the cortex. Physical Review Letters, 107, 018102.
20.
HoffP. D.RafteryA. E.HandcockM. S. (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 1090–1098.
21.
HollandP. W.BlackmondK.LeinhardtS. (1983). Stochastic block models: First steps. Social Networks, 5, 109–137.
22.
HollandP. W.LeinhardtS. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 33–50.
23.
JacobsA. Z.ClausetA. (2014). A unified view of generative models for networks: Models, methods, opportunities, and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4070. Retrieved fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4070
24.
KolaczykE. D. (2009). Statistical analysis of network data: Methods and models (1st ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
25.
KolaczykE. D.GaborC. (2014). Statistical analysis of network data with R. New York, NY: Springer.
26.
LazegaE. (2001). The collegial phenomenon: The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press on Demand.
27.
MorenoJ. L. (1935). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 388–393.
O’MalleyJ. A. (2013). The analysis of social network data: As exciting frontier for statisticians. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 539–555.
30.
PenuelW. R.RielM.KrauseA. E.FrankK. A. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. The Teachers College Record, 111, 124–163.
31.
PittsV. M.SpillaneJ. P. (2009). Using social network methods to study school leadership. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32, 185–207.
32.
PonsP.LatapyM. (2006). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 10, 191–218.
33.
RipleyR.BoitmanisK.SnijdersT. A. (2013). RSiena: Siena—Simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (R Package Version 1.1-232). Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RSiena
34.
RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY.LusherD. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 173–191.
35.
ShaliziC. R.ThomasA. C. (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 211–239.
36.
SnijdersT. A. (1996). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 149–172.
37.
SpillaneJ. P.HopkinsM. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: How the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 721–747.
38.
SpillaneJ. P.KimC. M.FrankK. A. (2012). Instructional advice and information providing and receiving behavior in elementary schools exploring tie formation as a building block in social capital development. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1112–1145.
39.
SweetT. M.ThomasA. C.JunkerB. W. (2013). Hierarchical network models for education research: Hierarchical latent space models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 295–318.
40.
WassermanS.PattinsonP. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov Graphs and . Psychometrika, 61, 401–425.
41.
WattsD. J.StrogatzS. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
