American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BeatonA. E.AllenN. L. (1992). Interpreting scales through scale anchoring. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 191–204.
3.
BeatonA. E.LinnR. L.BohrnstedtG. W. (2012). Alternative approaches to setting performance standards for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, NAEP Validity Studies Panel.
4.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.
5.
DoransN. J.FeigenbaumM. D. (1994). Equating issues engendered by changes to the SAT and PSAT/NMSQT (ETS Research Memorandum No. RM-94-10). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
6.
HaertelE. H. (2013). Getting the help we need. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 84–90.
7.
HaertelE. H.HoA. D. (In press). Fairness using derived scores. In CookL.DoransN. (Eds.), Fairness. Philadelphia, PA: National Council on Measurement in Education.
8.
HoA. D. (2008). The problem with “proficiency”: Limitations of statistics and policy under no child left behind. Educational Researcher, 37, 351–360.
9.
HoA. D. (2013). The epidemiology of modern test score use: Anticipating aggregation, adjustment, and equating. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 11, 64–67.
10.
HoA. D.ReardonS. F. (2012). Estimating achievement gaps from test scores reported in ordinal “proficiency” categories. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37, 489–517.
11.
KaneM. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1–73.
ThissenD. (2016). Bad questions: An essay involving item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41, 81–89.
14.
WainerH. (2010). 14 Conversations about three things. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 5–25.
15.
WessonL.PottsK.HillK. (2015, 3). Use of value-added in teacher evaluations: Key concepts and state profiles. Nashville, TN: Offices of Research and Education Accountability. Retrieved fromhttp://www.comptroller.tn.gov/Repository/RE/ValueAdded2015.pdf
16.
WilsonM. R. (2011). Some notes on the term: “Wright Map.”Rasch Measurement Transactions, 25, 1331.