The purpose of this study is to compare the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian estimation methods for polychoric correlation (PCC) under diverse conditions using a Monte Carlo simulation. Two new Bayesian estimates, maximum a posteriori (MAP) and expected a posteriori (EAP), are compared to ML, the classic solution, to estimate PCC. Different types of prior distributions are used to investigate the sensitivity of a prior distribution onto the Bayesian PCC estimation. In this simulation study, it appears that the MAP would be the estimator of choice for the PCC. The performance of the MAP is not only better than the ML but also appears to overcome the limitations of the EAP (i.e., the shrinkage effect).
Babakus E.,Ferguson C. E..On choosing the appropriate measure of association when analyzing rating scale data.Academy of Marketing Science. 1988;16:95-103
2.
Bandalos D. L.Structural equation modeling: A second course. Hancock G. R.Mueller R. O., ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc; 2006:385-427.
3.
Bock R.,Aitken M..Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm.Psychometrika. 1981;46:443-459
4.
Bollen K. A.Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley; 1989:
5.
Bollen K.,Barb K..Pearson’s r and coarsely categorized measures.American Sociological Review. 1981;46:232-239
6.
Borgatta E.,Bohrnstedt G..Level of measurement once over again.Sociological Methods & Research. 1980;9:147-160
7.
Chen J.,Choi J..A comparison of maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori estimation for polychoric correlation using Monte Carlo simulation.Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2009;8:337-354
8.
Chen J.,Choi J.,Kim S.2nd ed.2009:
9.
Chen S. K.,Hou L.,Dodd B. G..A comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and expected a posteriori estimation in CAT using the partial credit model.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1998;58:569-595
10.
Choi J.,Chen J.,Kim S..Bayes PCC (v 3.0.0): A Stand-Alone Microsoft Windows Software Program for Estimating Polychoric Correlation Matrices Using Bayesian Estimation Methods.. in press;:
11.
Choi J.,Chen J.,Kim S..EAPPCC: A Matlab subroutine for estimating polychoric correlation matrices using an expected a posteriori estimation method.Applied Psychological Measurement. in press;:
12.
Choi J.,Peters M.,Mueller R..Correlational analysis of ordinal data: From Pearson's r to Bayesian Polychoric Correlation.Asia Pacific Education Review. 2010;11:459-466
13.
Flora D. B.Evaluation of categorical variable methodology for confirmatory factor analysis with Likert-typed data. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2002:
14.
Flora D. B.,Curran P. J..An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.Psychological Methods. 2004;9:466-491
15.
Jöreskog K. G..A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika. 1969;32:183-202
16.
JöreskogK. G. (2002–2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Retrieved July 10, 2007, fromhttp://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf
17.
Jöreskog K.,Moustaki I..Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2001;36:347-387
Lynch S. M.Introduction to applied Bayesian statistics and estimation for social scientists. New York: Springer; 2007:
20.
Mayer L..A note on treating ordinal data as interval data.American Sociological Review. 1971;36:519-520
21.
Mislevy R. J.,Stocking M. L..A consumer’s guide to LOGIST and BILOG.Applied Psychological Measurement. 1989;13:57-75
22.
O’Brien R..The relationship between ordinal measures and their underlying values: Why all the disagreement?.Quality and Quantity. 1985;19:265-277
23.
Olsson U..Maximum likelihood of the polychoric correlation coefficient.Psychometrika. 1979;44:443-460
24.
Quiroga A. M.Studies of the polychoric correlation and other correlation measures for ordinal variables. Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 1992:
25.
Rigdon E. E.,Ferguson C. E..The performance of the polychoric correlation coefficient and selected fitting functions in confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.Journal of Marketing Research. 1991;28:491-497
