This article introduces a multilevel growth mixture model (MGMM) for classifying both the individuals and the groups they are nested in. Nine variations of the general model are described that differ in terms of categorical and continuous latent variable specification within and between groups. An application in the context of school effectiveness research is presented. Schools are classified into three Type B effectiveness categories based on their mean student mathematics achievement growth trajectories, controlling for differences in students' backgrounds across schools. The classification outcome is regressed on a set of school practice variables to investigate the association between practices and cognitive development. Various issues related to model specification are discussed, including the use of covariates to identify substantively meaningful classes.
Aitkin M..A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models.Biometrics. 1999;55:218-234
2.
Akaike H.Second international symposium on information theory. Petrov B. N.Csaki F., ed. Budapest, Hungary: Akademia Kiado; 1973:267-281.
3.
Alexander K. L.,Entwisle D. R.Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes?. Alan BoothJudy Dunn, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996:67-88.
4.
Asparouhov T.,Muthen B.Advances in latent variable mixture models. Hancock G. R.Samuelsen K. M., ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing; 2008:27-75.
5.
Bauer D. J.,Curran P. J..Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes.Psychological Methods. 2003;8:338-363
6.
Bauer D. J.,Curran P. J..The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities.Psychological Methods. 2004;9:3-29
7.
Bollen K. A.,Curran P. J.Latent curve models: A structural equation approach. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2006:
8.
Bozdogan H.Information and classification, concepts, methods and applications. Opitz O.Lausen B.Klar R., ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1993:40-54.
9.
Cooper H.,Nye B.,Charlton K.,Lindsay J.,Greathouse S..The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review.Review of Educational Research. 1996;66:227-268
10.
Cudeck R.,Henly S. J..A realistic perspective on pattern representation in growth data: Comment on Bauer and Curran.Psychological Methods. 2003;8:378-383
11.
David J. L..Synthesis of research on school-based management.Educational Leadership. 1989;46:45-53
12.
Day N. E..Estimating the components of mixture of normal distributions.Biometrika. 1969;56:463-474
13.
Dempster A. P.,Laird N. M.,Rubin D. B..Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B. 1977;39:1-38
14.
Dias J. G.Data science and classification. Batagelj V.Bock H.-H.Ferligoj A.Žiberna A., ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006:91-99.
15.
Dias J. G.Advances in data analysis. Decker R.Lenz H.-J., ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2007:23-30.
16.
Duncan T. E.,Duncan S. C.,Strycker A. L.,Li F.,Alpert A.An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:
17.
Ferguson T. S.Recent advances in statistics. Rizvi M. H.Rustagi J. S.Siegmund D., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983:287-302.
18.
Fox J. P.,Glas C. A. W..Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling.Psychometrika. 2001;66:269-286
19.
Goodman L. A..The analysis of systems of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable. Part I: A modified latent structure approach.American Journal of Sociology. 1974;79:1179-1259
20.
Hedeker D.,Gibbons R. D.Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2006:
21.
Lazarsfeld P. F.Studies on social psychology in World War II, Vol. 4: Measurement and prediction. Stouffer S. A.Suchman E. A.Lazarsfeld P. F.Starr S. A.Clausen J., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1950:
22.
Lazarsfeld P. F.,Henry N. W.Latent structure analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1968:
23.
Lubke G.,Neale M. C..Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood?.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2006;41:499-532
24.
Lukociene O.,Vermunt J. K.Advances in data analysis, data handling and business intelligence. Fink A.Berthold L.Seidel W.Ultsch A., ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010:
25.
McLachlan G. J.,Peel D.Finite mixture models. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2000:
26.
Muthen B.New methods for the analysis of change. Collins L. M.Sayer A., ed. Washington, DC: APA; 2001:291-322.
27.
Muthen B.Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Kaplan D., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004:345-368.
Muthen B. O.,Shedden K..Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm.Biometrics. 1999;55:463-469
30.
Muthen L. K.,Muthen B. O.Mplus user’s guide. 5th ed.Los Angeles, CA: Author; 1998–2007:
31.
Nagin D. S..Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach.Psychological Methods. 1999;4:139-177
32.
Nagin D. S.Group-based modeling of development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 2005:
33.
Nagin D. S.,Tremblay R. E..Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method.Psychological Methods. 2001;6:18-34
34.
User’s manual for the ECLS-K first grade public-use data files and electronic codebook.NCES 2002–135. 2002;:
35.
Palardy G. J.,Rumberger R. W..Teacher effectiveness in the first grade: The importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2008;30:111-140
36.
Rabe-Hesketh S.,Skrondal A.Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. 2nd ed.College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2008:
SpiegelhalterD.ThomasA.BestN.LunnD. (2003). Winbugs user manual version 1.4. Retrieved August 3, 2006, fromhttp://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/winbugs/manua114.pdf
44.
Tofighi D.,Enders C. K.Advances in latent variable mixture models. Hancock G. R.Samuelson K. M., ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing; 2007:
45.
Verbeke G.,Lesaffre G..A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996;91:217-221
46.
Vermunt J. K..Multilevel latent class models.Sociological Methodology. 2003;33:213-239
