BaldwinP.BernsteinJ.WainerH. (2009). Hip psychometrics. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 2277–2292.
2.
LordF. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
SinharayS.DoransN. (2010). Two simple approaches to overcome a problem with the Mantel-Haenszel statistic: Comments on Wang, Bradlow, Wainer, and Muller. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35.
4.
ThissenD. (2001). IRTLRDIF v.2.0b: Software for the computation of statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Unpublished manuscript, L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
5.
ThissenD.SteinbergL.WainerH. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines. In WainerH.BraunH. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 147–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
ThissenD.SteinbergL.WainerH. (1993). Detection of Differential Item Functioning using the Parameters of Item Response Models. In HollandP. W.WainerH. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 67–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
ThissenD.WainerH. (1985, July). Studying item bias with item response theory. Paper presented at the Fourth European meeting of the Psychometric Society, Cambridge, England.
8.
WainerH.BradlowE.WangX. (2007). Testlet Response Theory and its applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
WangX.BradlowE.WainerH.MullerE. (2008). A Bayesian method for studying DIF: A cautionary tale filled with surprises and delights. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 363–384.