Abstract
One emphasis in the development and evaluation of SIBTEST has been the control of Type I error (false flagging of non-differential item functioning [DIF] items) inflation and estimation bias. SIBTEST has performed well in comparative simulation studies of Type I error and estimation bias relative to other procedures such as the Mantel-Haenszel and Logistic Regression. Nevertheless it has for a minority of cases that might occur in applications displayed sizable Type I error inflation and estimation bias.
A vital part of SIBTEST is the regression correction, which adjusts for the Type I error-inflating and estimation-biasing influence of group target ability differences by using the linear regression of true on observed matching subtest scores from Classical Test Theory. In this paper, we propose a new regression correction, using essentially a two-segment piecewise linear regression of the true on observed matching subtest scores. A realistic simulation study of the new approach shows that when there is a clear group ability distributional difference, the new approach displays improved SIBTEST Type I error performance; when there is no group ability distributional difference, its Type I error rate is comparable to the current SIBTEST. We have also conducted a power study which indicates that the new approach has on average similar power as the current SIBTEST. We concluded that the new version of SIBTEST, although not perfectly robust, seems appropriately robust against sizable Type I error inflation, while retaining other desirable features of the current version.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
