Abstract
Analyzing the agreement between and within more than two groups of judges is presented in the form of an ANACONDA (Analysis of Concordance) Table. Also, the consensus ranking (for those groups which exhibit some agreement) of the k objects is determined using existing multiple comparison procedures based on Friedman rank sums.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.