The Effectiveness of an Early-Grade Literacy Intervention on the Cognitive Achievement of Brazilian Students

Abstract

Beginning in 2007, the Literacy Program at the Right Age (Pacto pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa [PAIC]) in Brazil’s Ceará state required municipal schools to implement a tiered, whole-school early-grade literacy intervention. This intervention was complemented by other policies to help municipalities improve student achievement. The present study identifies PAIC’s impact using a triple-difference analysis (Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference [DDD] approach) that relies on comparisons of the test-score changes in Ceará and bordering states and for grades and schools treated and not treated by the literacy program since 2007. The results show that PAIC had a positive effect on student achievement in both Portuguese and mathematics, but that it did not help reduce the gap between students who had or had not participated in early childhood education.

Keywords

literacy early childhood achievement gains

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

J. D.

Pischke

J.-S.

(2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ashdown

Simic

(2000). Is early literacy intervention effective for English language learners? Evidence from reading recovery. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 5, 27–42.

Baker

S. K.

Smolkowski

Smith

J. M.

Fien

Kame’enui

E. J.

Thomas Beck

(2011). The impact of Oregon Reading First on student reading outcomes. Elementary School Journal, 112, 307–331.

Barnett

W. S.

(2002). Early childhood education. In Molnar

(Ed.), School reform proposals: The research evidence (pp. 1-26). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Bertrand

Duflo

Mullainathan

(2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.

Carrasco

(2014). Leveling the playing field: How can we address educational inequalities? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Chaudhury

Parajuli

(2010). Conditional cash transfers and female schooling: The impact of the female school stipend program on public school enrolments in Punjab, Pakistan. Applied Economics, 42, 3565–3583.

Chiapa

Garrido

J. L.

Prina

(2012). The effect of social programs and exposure to professionals on the educational aspirations of the poor. Economics of Education Review, 31, 778–798.

Cunha

Heckman

(2010). Investing in our young people. In Reynolds

A. J.

Rollnick

A. J.

Englund

M. M.

Temple

J. A.

(Eds.), Childhood programs and practices in the first decade of life (pp. 381-414). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Currie

Thomas

(1993). Does Head Start make a difference? (NBER Working Paper No. 4406). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

11.

Elbaum

Vaughn

Hughes

M. T.

Moody

S. W.

(2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.

12.

Gamse

B. C.

Jacob

R. T.

Horst

Boulay

Unlu

Bozzi

. . . Rosenblum

(2008). Reading First impact study: Final report (NCEE 2008-4038). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

13.

Gove

Wetterberg

(Eds.). (2011). The Early Grade Reading Assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.

14.

Gusmão

J. B.

Ribeiro

V. M.

(2011). Colaboração entre estado e municípios para a alfabetização de crianças na idade certa no Ceará [Collaboration between the state and municipalities to make children in Ceará literate at the right age]. Cadernos Cenpec, 1(1): 9–34.

15.

Heckman

Masterov

(2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 446–493.

16.

Hill

Rowan

Ball

(2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.

17.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística. (2001). Pesquisa nacional de amostra de domicilios (PNAD) [Microdata files]. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/trabalhoerendimento/pnad2011/microdados.shtm

18.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística. (2007). Pesquisa nacional de amostra de domicilios (PNAD) [Microdata files]. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/trabalhoerendimento/pnad2011/microdados.shtm

19.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estadística. (2011). Pesquisa nacional de amostra de domicilios (PNAD) [Microdata files]. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/trabalhoerendimento/pnad2011/microdados.shtm

20.

Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas. (2008). Prova Brasil, 2007. Brasilia, Brazil: INEP. Available from http://portal.inep.gov.br/

21.

Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas. (2010). Prova Brasil, 2009. Brasilia, Brazil: INEP. Available from http://portal.inep.gov.br/

22.

Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas. (2012). Prova Brasil, 2011. Brasilia, Brazil: INEP. Available from http://portal.inep.gov.br/

23.

Jencks

Phillips

(1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

24.

Kane

Staiger

D. O.

(2002). The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 91–114.

25.

Lyons

C. A.

(1998). Reading recovery in the United States: More than a decade of data. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 3, 77–92.

26.

May

Gray

Gillespie

J. N.

Sirinides

Sam

Goldsworthy

Armijo

Tognatta

(2013). Evaluation of the i3 scale-up of reading recovery: Year One Report, 2011-2012 (Report RR-76). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

27.

Neuman

S. B.

Dickinson

D. K.

(2006). Handbook of early literacy research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

28.

Ralaingita

Wetterberg

(2011). Program effectiveness with EGRA: Impact evaluations in South Africa and Mali. In Gove

Wetterberg

(Eds.), The Early Grade Reading Assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy (pp. 83-112). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.

29.

Ravallion

Galasso

Lazo

Philipp

(2005). What can ex-participants reveal about a program’s impact? Journal of Human Resources, 40, 208–230.

30.

Schwartz

R. M.

(2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in the Reading Recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 257–267.

31.

Slavin

Lake

Davis

Madden

(2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6, 1–26.

32.

Tyler

J. H.

Taylor

E. S.

Kane

T. J.

Wooten

A. L.

(2010). Using student performance data to identify effective classroom practices. The American Economic Review, 100, 256–260.

33.

Vieira

S. L.

Vidal

Costa

L. O.

(2010). Ensino fundamental: Fim de um ciclo expansionista? [Basic Education: The end of an expansionist cycle?]. Brasilia, Brazil: Study commissioned by the Center for Strategic Studies and Management in Science, Technology and Innovation (CGEE).