Selective higher education institutions around the world are increasingly adopting holistic admissions practices—making it crucial to understand how admissions personnel make decisions, with what consequences for access and equity. Based on 51 interviews with admissions officers and faculty at Korea’s most selective universities, we examine competing definitions of who is worthy of admission and how these in turn influence evaluations. We demonstrate that admissions decisions are profoundly shaped not only by formal policy but also by values and interests stemming from evaluator’s own personal and professional backgrounds, as well as power dynamics among evaluators. Our findings suggest that microprocesses of discretion among admissions officers and faculty undermine government policy efforts to increase equity in admissions outcomes.
AbbottA. (1988). The systems of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
2.
BastedoM. N. (2021). Holistic admissions as a global phenomenon. In EgginsH.SmolentsevaA.de WitH. (Eds.), Higher education in the next decade: Global challenges, future prospects (pp. 91–114). Brill.
3.
BastedoM. N.BowmanN. A.GlasenerK. M.KellyJ. L. (2018). What are we talking about when we talk about holistic review? Selective college admissions and its effects on low-SES students. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 782–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1442633
4.
BowmanN. A.BastedoM. N. (2018). What role may admissions office diversity and practices play in equitable decisions?Research in Higher Education, 59, 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9468-9
5.
Burns-WallaceD. J. (2009). Diversifying the ivory tower: Complexities of serving as a senior admissions diversity officer in an evolving affirmative action climate [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania].
6.
ByounS. (2012). Decoupling of higher education institutions: A comparative case study approach [Doctoral dissertation, Korea University]. [In Korean.]
7.
ByunS.JooY. (2012). Determinants and effects of school choice: Evidence from the Seoul Education Longitudinal Study. The Journal of Korean Education, 39(1), 5–33. [In Korean.]
GroteD. M.KnightD. B.LeeW. C.WatfordB. A. (2020). Exploring influences of policy collisions on transfer student access: Perspectives from street-level bureaucrats. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 576–602.
15.
GrubbN. W.SweetR.GallagherM.TuomiO. (2009). OECD reviews of tertiary education: Korea. OECD.
16.
HarritsG. S.MøllerM. Ø. (2014). Prevention at the front line: How home nurses, pedagogues, and teachers transform public worry into decisions on special efforts. Public Management Review, 16(4), 447–480.
17.
HarritsG. S. (2016). Being professional and being human: Professional’s sensemaking in the context of close and frequent interactions with citizens. Professions and Professionalism, 6(2), 1–16.
18.
HoltonS. A.PhillipsG. (1995). Can’t live with them, can’t live without them: Faculty and administrators in conflict. New Directions for Higher Education, 92, 43–50.
19.
HonigM. I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383.
JilkeS.TummersL. (2018). Which clients are deserving of help? A theoretical model and experimental test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 226–238.
24.
KimC.ShinH. (2020). Adaption strategy of the upper class and fairness in elite college admission. Korean Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 35–83. [In Korean.]
KimH. (2024). A fad or the new norm for student access today? Evaluating enrollment outcomes of holistic admissions in South Korea. Research in Higher Education, 65(5), 1040–1064.
27.
KimJ. (2011). Aspiration for global cultural capital in the stratified realm of global higher education: Why do Korean students go to US graduate schools?British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(1), 109–126.
KimN. (2017, October26). Strong in math and science? Consider a national autonomous private high school. Seoul Economic Daily. [In Korean.] https://www.sedaily.com/NewsView/1OMGDUNUSP
30.
KimS.WooM. (2020). The influence of high school type on high school seniors’ academic achievement: Effects of high school type and educational inequality. Journal of Educational Studies, 51(4), 149–173.
31.
KimY.KimS. (2021). Being an academic: How junior female academics in Korea survive in the neoliberal context of a patriarchal society. Higher Education, 81, 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00613-3
KuoH. (2009). Understanding relationships between academic staff and administrators: An organizational culture perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(1), 43–54.
LamontM. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press.
40.
LeeD. H.EnglerJ. S.HurtadoJ. M.RazaA.PoonO. A. (2022). More than marketing: Professional development and learning to integrate diversity. In PoonO. A.BastedoM. N. (Eds.), Rethinking college admissions (pp. 133–148). Harvard Education Press.
LipskyM. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (2nd ed.). Russell Sage Foundation. (Original work published 1966)
44.
LucidoJ. A. (2015). How admissions decisions get made. In HosslerD.BontragerB. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic enrollment management (pp. 147–173). Jossey-Bass.
45.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358.
46.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
47.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications.
48.
MinS. (2017). A narrative inquiry on the admissions officers’ experiences. The Journal of Korean Educational Idea, 31(1), 71–111. [In Korean.]
49.
Mountford-ZimdarsA.MooreJ. (2020). Identifying merit and potential beyond grades: Opportunities and challenges in using contextual data in undergraduate admissions at nine highly selective English universities. Oxford Review of Education, 46(6), 752–769.
OhH. (2014). Hospital consultations and jurisdiction over patients: Consequences for the medical profession. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(4), 580–595.
54.
OlaisonA.TorresS.ForssellE. (2018). Professional discretion and length of work experience: What findings from focus groups with care managers in elder care suggest. Journal of Social Work Practice, 32(2), 153–167.
ParkN. (2018). The betrayal of merit. SamnParkers. [In Korean.]
57.
PhairJ. (2014). Career paths for admission officers: A survey report. NACAC.
58.
PosseltJ.SouthernD.HernandezT.DesirS.AlleyneF.MillerC. W. (2023). Redefining merit through new routines: Holistic admissions policy implementation in graduate education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 47(1), 159–184.
59.
PosseltJ. R. (2016). Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. Harvard University Press.
60.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. (1973). Implementation. University of California Press.
61.
RiveraL. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022.
62.
RiveraL. A. (2020). Employer decision making. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 215–232.
63.
RodriguezA.Rodriguez-WilhelmD.LebiodaK.KappR.WilsonN. (2022). Skin in the game: A policy implementation study of how school-level bureaucrats set and rationalize advanced placement exam fees for low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 63, 369–399.
ShimJ.KimK. (2017). Effects of autonomous private high school expansion on achievement gap between students of different types of high schools. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 49–80. [In Korean.]
66.
SongK. (2017, July13). Daeipjaedo daegookmin yeoronchosa gyeolgwa [Results of national public opinion poll on college admissions, Report by National Assemblyman Ki-seok Song]. 2021 Haknyeon-do ehoo daeipjaedo gaeseonbangan torunhoe [Forum on improving college admissions from 2021 academic year], Seoul. [In Korean.]
67.
StevensM. L. (2009). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Harvard University Press.
68.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
69.
Van OorschotW. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28, 33–48.
70.
Watkins-HayesC. (2009). Race-ing the bootstrap climb: Black and Latino bureaucrats in post-reform welfare offices. Social Problems, 56(2), 285–310.
71.
WonS. (2009). A gendered dynamics of stereotypical perceptions towards female managers in governmental organizations: Focusing on gender differences. Journal of Korean Women’s Studies, 25(1), 73–101. [In Korean.]
