Many school districts consider family preferences in allocating students to schools. In theory, this approach provides disadvantaged families greater access to high-quality schools by weakening the link between residential location and school assignment. We leverage data on the school choices made by over 233,000 New York City families across a 4-year period to examine the extent to which the city’s school choice system fulfills this promise. Although families can apply to any school, oversubscribed and high-quality schools enroll smaller proportions of students from traditionally disadvantaged families. We explored three mechanisms to explain this inequitable distribution: application timing, the school matching structure, and neighborhood stratification. We find that all three mechanisms have a disequalizing influence and propose several potential policy solutions.
AbdulkadiroğluA.PathakP. A.RothA. E. (2009). Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school match. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1954–1978.
2.
AbdulkadiroğluA.PathakP. A.SchellenbergJ.WaltersC. R. (2020). Do parents value school effectiveness?American Economic Review, 110(5), 1502–1539.
3.
AltenhofenS.BerendsM.WhiteT. G. (2016). School choice decision making among suburban, high-income parents. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–44.
4.
Andre-BechelyL. (2007). Finding space and managing distance: Public school choice in an urban California district. Urban Studies, 44(7), 1355–1376.
5.
ArchbaldD. A. (2004). School choice, magnet schools, and the liberation model: An empirical study. Sociology of Education, 77(4), 283–310.
6.
AustenB. (2018). High-risers: Cabrini-Green and the fate of American public housing. HarperCollins Publishers.
7.
BaluR.CondliffeB.HennessyM. (2021). Kindergarten outreach, application, and enrollment: Lessons learned from a research-practice partnership with New York City’s Department of Education. MDRC.
8.
BellC. (2009a). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.
9.
BellC. (2009b). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493–521.
10.
BettsJ. R. (2005). The economic theory of school choice. In BettsJ. R.LovelessT. (Eds.), Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (pp. 14–39). Brookings Institution Press.
11.
BierbaumA. H.KarnerA.BarajasJ. M. (2021). Toward mobility justice: Linking transportation and education equity in the context of school choice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(2), 197–210.
12.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F.RossS. L. (2009). Public school choice and integration evidence from Durham, North Carolina. Social Science Research, 38(1), 71–85.
13.
BillinghamC. M.HuntM. O. (2016). School racial composition and parental choice: New evidence on the preferences of white parents in the United States. Sociology of Education, 89(2), 99–117.
14.
CalsamigliaC.GüellM. (2018). Priorities in school choice: The case of the Boston mechanism in Barcelona. Journal of Public Economics, 163, 20–36.
15.
CarlsonD.DominaT.CarterJ. S.PereraR. M.McEachinA.RadskyV. (2023). Structured choice: School segregation at the intersection of policy and preferences (EdWorkingPaper 23-753). Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
16.
CobbC. D.GlassG. V. (2009). School choice in a post-desegregation world. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 262–278
17.
CondliffeB.BaluR. (2019). Missing from the start: Engagement in New York City’s Kindergarten Application (Practitioner brief). MDRC.
18.
CorcoranS. P.JenningsJ. L.CohodesS. R.Sattin-BajajC. (2018). Leveling the playing field for high school choice: Results from a field experiment of informational interventions (No. w24471). National Bureau of Economic Research.
DeJarnattS. L. (2008). School choice and the (ir)rational parent. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 15(1), 1–48.
21.
DeniceP.GrossB. (2016). Choice, preferences, and constraints: Evidence from public school applications in Denver. Sociology of Education, 89(4), 300–320.
22.
DesmondM.GershensonC.KiviatB. (2015). Forced relocation and residential instability among urban renters. Social Service Review, 89(2), 227–262.
23.
EdwardsD. S. (2021). Just out of reach? Unrestrained supply, constrained demand, and access to effective schools in and around Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(3), 391–418.
24.
EhrlichS. B.ConnorsM. C.SteinA. G.FrancisJ.EastonJ. Q.KabourekS. E.FarrarI. C. (2020). Closer to home: More equitable pre-k access and enrollment in Chicago.University of Chicago Consortium on School Research, NORC at the University of Chicago, and Start Early.
25.
FongK.FaudeS. (2018). Timing is everything: Late registration and stratified access to school choice. Sociology of Education, 91(3), 242–262.
26.
FrankenbergE. (2011). Integration after Parents Involved. In FrankenbergE.DeBrayE. (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society (pp. 53–75). The University of North Carolina Press.
27.
Furman Center. (2008). Public housing and public schools: How do students living in NYC public housing fare in school?New York University, Furman Center for Real Estate & Urban Policy.
28.
GlazermanS.DotterD. (2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 593–619.
29.
GortázarL.MayorD.MontalbánJ. (2023). Residence-based priorities and school choice. Economics of Education Review, 95, 102384.
30.
GoyetteK. A. (2008). Race, social background, and school choice options. Equity and Excellence in Education, 41(1), 114–129.
31.
HaileyC. A. (2022). Racial preferences for schools: Evidence from an experiment with White, Black, Latinx, and Asian parents and students. Sociology of Education, 95(2), 110–132.
32.
HastingsJ. S.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2005). Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program (NBER Working Paper No. 11805). National Bureau of Economic Research.
33.
HolmeJ. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177–206.
34.
JabbarH.LenhoffS. W. (2019). Parent decision-making and school choice. In BerendsM.PrimusA.SpringerM. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 351–364). Routledge.
35.
JacksonM. (2020). Manifesto for a dream: Inequality, constraint, and radical reform. Stanford University Press.
36.
JohnsonH. B.ShapiroT. M. (2003). Good neighborhoods, good schools: Race and the “good choices” of white families. In DoaneA. W.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of racism (pp. 173–187). Routledge.
37.
KahlenbergR. D. (2001). Socioeconomic school integration through public school choice: A progressive alternative to vouchers. Howard Law Journal, 45, 247.
38.
KleitzB.WeiherG. R.TedinK.MatlandR. (2000). Choice, charter schools, and household preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 846–854.
39.
KucseraJ.OrfieldG. (2014). New York State’s extreme school segregation: Inequality, inaction and a damaged future. The Civil Rights Project at UCLA.
40.
LoganJ. R.StultsB. J. (2011). The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 census (US2010 project report). Brown University.
41.
MaderN.HemphillC.AbbasQ. (2018). The paradox of choice: How school choice divides New York City elementary schools. Center for New York City Affairs.
42.
MasseyD. S.AlbrightL.CascianoR.DericksonE.KinseyD. N. (2013). Climbing Mount Laurel: The struggle for affordable housing and social mobility in an American suburb. Princeton University Press.
43.
MennleT.SeukenS. (2017). Trade-offs in school choice: comparing deferred acceptance, the classic and the adaptive Boston mechanism. Department of Informatics, University of Zurich.
44.
PattilloM. (2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the Black community. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 12(1), 41–71.
45.
PérezM. (2011). Two tales of one city: A political economy of the New York City public high school admissions process. City University of New York.
46.
PhillipsK. J.LarsenE. S.HausmanC. (2015). School choice & social stratification: How intra-district transfers shift the racial/ethnic and economic composition of schools. Social Science Research, 51, 30–50.
47.
ReadyD. D.ReidJ. L. (2023). Segregating Gotham’s youngest: Racial/ethnic sorting and the choice architecture of New York City’s Pre-K for All. American Educational Research Journal, 60(5), 1023–1052.
48.
RenzulliL. A.EvansL. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and white flight. Social Problems, 52(3), 398–418.
49.
RhodesA.DeLucaS. (2014). Residential mobility and school choice among poor families. In LareauA.GoyetteK. (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 137–166). Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
RodaA.WellsA. S. (2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where white parents’ good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 261–293.
51.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing.
52.
SaporitoS.LareauA. (1999). School selection as a process: The multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice. Social Problems, 46(3), 418–439.
53.
SaporitoS.SohoniD. (2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79(2), 81–105.
54.
Sattin-BajajC. (2014). Two roads diverged: Exploring variation in students’ school choice experiences by socioeconomic status, parental nativity, and ethnicity. Journal of School Choice, 8(3), 410–445.
55.
Sattin-BajajC.RodaA. (2020). Opportunity hoarding in school choice contexts: The role of policy design in promoting middle-class parents’ exclusionary behaviors. Educational Policy, 34(7), 992–1035.
56.
SchneiderM.BuckleyJ. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.
57.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton University Press.
58.
SchwartzH. (2012). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. In KahlenbergR. (Ed.), The future of school integration: Socioeconomic diversity as an education reform strategy. The Century Foundation Press.
59.
ScottJ. T.WellsA. S. (2013). A more perfect unions: Reconciling school choice policy with equality of opportunity goals. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 123–140). Oxford University Press.
60.
SteinM.GoldringE.CravensX. (2010). Choosing Indianapolis Charter Schools: Espoused versus revealed academic preferences (Research brief). National Center on School Choice, Vanderbilt University (NJ1).
61.
TrajkovskiS.ZabelJ.SchwartzA. E. (2021). Do school buses make school choice work?Regional Science and Urban Economics, 86, 103607.
62.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). White to non-white racial dissimilarity (5-year estimate) index for New York County, NY [RACEDISPARITY036061]. FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RACEDISPARITY036061
63.
ValantJ.WalkerB. (2023). Setting priorities in school choice enrollment systems: Who benefits from placement algorithm preferences? (Technical report). National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice.
64.
ValantJ.WeixlerL. (2020). Does information about high-performing and close-to-home schools affect families’ choices on the Oneapp?Education Research Alliance.
65.
WeixlerL.ValantJ.DoromalJ. B.GerryA. (2024). Increasing access in the ECE enrollment process: Evidence from an information intervention in New Orleans. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 68, 54–64.
