Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A major concern among opponents to charter schools is whether these schools will serve all students. Some have raised concerns that charter schools will “push out” low-achieving students in hopes of improving the schools’ academic profile while minimizing costs by educating fewer challenging students. In this article, we use data from an anonymous major urban school district to examine whether we see exit patterns consistent with the claim that charter schools are more likely to push out low-achieving students than are traditional public schools (TPSs). Overall, we find no empirical evidence to support the notion of push-out.

Keywords

school choice charter schools segregation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroglu

Angrist

Cohodes

Dynarski

Fullerton

Kane

Pathak

(2009). Informing the debate: Comparing Boston’s charter, pilot, and traditional schools. Boston, MA: The Boston Foundation.

Alexander

K. L.

Entwisle

D. R.

Dauber

S. L.

(1996). Children in motion: School transfers and elementary school performance. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 3–12.

Bifulco

Ladd

H. F.

(2006). The impact of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Journal of Education Finance and Policy, 1, 50–90.

Bifulco

Ladd

H. F.

(2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina’s charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 31–56.

Black

S. E.

(1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary schools. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 577–599.

Booher-Jennings

J. H. F.

(2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231–268.

Booker

Gilpatric

S. M.

Gronberg

T. J.

Jansen

D. W.

(2007). The impact of charter school student attendance on student performance. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 849–876.

Booker

Sass

Gill

Zimmer

(2011). The effects of charter high schools on educational attainment. Journal of Labor Economics, 29, 377–415.

Booker

Zimmer

Buddin

(2005). The effect of charter schools on school peer composition (RAND Working Paper No. WR-306-EDU). Retrieved from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/RAND_WR306.pdf

10.

Brown

(2013). D.C. charter schools expel students at far higher rates than traditional public schools. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-charter-schools-expel-students-at-far-higher-rates-than-traditional-public-schools/2013/01/05/e155e4bc-44a9-11e2-8061-253bccfc7532_story.html

11.

Butler

J. S.

Carr

Toma

E. F.

Zimmer

(in press). School attributes and distance: Tradeoffs in the school choice decision. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.

12.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2009). Multiple choice: Charter school performance in 16 states. Stanford, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_CREDO.pdf

13.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2011). Charter school performance in New Jersey. Stanford, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://credo.stanford.edu/pdfs/nj_state_report_2012_FINAL11272012.pdf

14.

Cobb

C. D.

Glass

G. V.

(1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 1–39.

15.

Cowen

J. M. G. V.

Fleming

D. J.

Witte

Wolf

(2011). Going public: Who leaves a large, longstanding, and widely available urban voucher program. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 1–25.

16.

Figlio

(2006). Testing, crime, and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 837–851.

17.

Finn

C. E.

Manno

B. V.

Vanourek

(2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

18.

Frankenberg

Siegel-Hawley

Wang

(2010). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil rights standards. Civil Rights Project, UCLA. Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/choice-without-equity-2009-report/frankenberg-choices-without-equity-2010.pdf

19.

GAO. (2012). Charter schools: Additional federal attention needed to help protect access for students with disabilities. Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/charterschoice/CharterReportGAO.pdf

20.

Garcia

D. R.

(2008). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools. Do parents sort students into specialized charter schools? Education and Urban Society, 40, 590–612.

21.

Garcia

D. R.

McIlroy

Barber

R. T.

(2008). Starting behind: A comparative analysis of the academic standing of students entering charter schools. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 199–216.

22.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2004). Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1721–1746.

23.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

Branch

G. F.

(2007). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 823–848.

24.

Henig

J. R.

(2008). What do we know about the outcomes of KIPP schools? EPIC/EPRU Policy Brief. Retrieved from www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Henig_Kipp.pdf

25.

Hoxby

C. M.

Murarka

(2007). Charter schools in New York City: Who enrolls and how they affect their students’ achievement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/~schools/charterschoolseval/nyc_charter_schools_technical_report_july2007.pdf

26.

Jacob

(2005). Accountability, incentives, and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761–796.

27.

Jacob

Levitt

(2007). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 761–796.

28.

Karp

(2010). One in 10 charter school students transfers out. Catalyst Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst-chicago.org/news/2010/11/09/one-in-10-charter-school-students-transfers-out

29.

Krieg

J. M.

(2008). Are students left behind? The distributional effects of the No Child Left Behind Act. Economics of Education Review, 3, 250–281.

30.

Lee

Croninger

R. G.

(1994). Parental choice of schools and social stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 434–457.

31.

Miron

Cullen

Applegate

Farrell

(2007). Evaluation of the Delaware charter school reform. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. Retrieved from http://www.doe.k12.de.us/infosuites/ddoe/sbe/docs/sbe_decseval.pdf

32.

Miron

Nelson

(2002). What’s public about charter schools? Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

33.

Miron

Urschel

J. L.

Mathis

Tornquist

E. J.

(2010). Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools and the demographic stratification of the American school system. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/schools-without-diversity

34.

Miron

Urschel

J. L.

Saxton

(2011). What makes KIPP work? A study of student characteristics, attrition, and school finance. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.

35.

Nathan

(1998). Controversy: Charters and choice. The American Prospect, 9. Available from www.prospect.org

36.

Neal

Schanzenbach

D. W.

(2010). Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 263–283.

37.

Nichols-Barrer

Gill

Gleason

Tuttle

(2012). Student selection, attrition, and replacement in KIPP middle schools. Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/education/KIPP_middle_schools_wp.pdf

38.

Ravitch

(2010). The death and life of the Great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.

39.

Ravitch

(2012). CON: Say “no thanks” to charter schools. Editorial in Montgomery Advertiser. Retrieved from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nyceducationnews/message/43167

40.

Ravitch

(n.d.). Florida model does not work. Letter to New Mexico State Legislators. Retrieved from http://www.independentsourcepac.com/diane-ravitch-letter-to-new-mexico-legislature.html

41.

Ritter

Jensen

Kisida

Bowen

(2012). Choosing charter schools: How does parental choice affect racial integration (NCSPE Working Paper No. 214). Retrieved from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP214.pdf

42.

Ritter

Jensen

Kisida

McGee

J. B.

(2010). A closer look at charter schools and segregation. Education Next, 10. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/a-closer-look-at-charter-schools-and-segregation/#comments

43.

Rumberger

R. W.

Larson

K. A.

Ream

R. K.

Palardy

G. J.

(1999). The educational consequences of mobility for California students and schools. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley and Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).

44.

Sass

T. R.

(2006). Charter schools and student achievement in Florida. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 91–122.

45.

Stein

Goldring

Cravens

(2011). Choosing Indianapolis charter schools: Espoused versus revealed academic preferences. In Berends

Cannata

Goldring

(Eds.), School choice and school improvement: Research in state, district and community contexts (pp. 105–124). Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.

46.

Weiher

G. R.

Tedin

K. L.

(2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 79–92.

47.

Wells

A. S.

(1993). Time to choose: America at the crossroads of school choice policy. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.

48.

Witte

Weimer

Shober

Schlomer

(2007). The performance of charter schools in Wisconsin. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 557–578.

49.

Hannaway

D’Souza

(2009). Student transience in North Carolina: The effect of mobility on student outcomes using longitudinal data (CALDER Working Paper No. 22). Washington, DC: CALDER and The Urban Institute.

50.

Zimmer

Buddin

(2006). Charter school performance in urban districts. Journal of Urban Economics, 60, 307–326.

51.

Zimmer

Buddin

Chau

Gill

Guarino

Hamilton

. . . Brewer

(2003). Charter school operation and performance: Evidence from California. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

52.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Sass

Witte

(2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

53.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Witte

(2011). Do charter schools “cream skim” students and increase racial-ethnic segregation? In Berends

Cannata

Goldring

(Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 215-232). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

54.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Witte

(2012). Examining charter school achievement in seven states. Economics of Education Review, 31, 213–224.

Is There Empirical Evidence That Charter Schools “Push Out” Low-Performing Students?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References