Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Colleges identify prospective students by purchasing “student lists.” Student list products are selection devices that use search filters to select students. Drawing from the sociology of race, we conceptualize some filters as “racialized inputs,” defined as inputs that are correlated with race because disadvantaged racial groups have historically been excluded from the input. Using a national sample of high school students, we explore the relationship between racialized search filters and the racial composition of included versus excluded students. Using data about actual lists purchased by public universities, we investigate how college administrators utilize racialized search filters. We discuss implications for federal and state policy. We motivate policy research about structural racism embedded in selection devices that allocate students to opportunities.

Keywords

admissions critical theory higher education policy race correlational analysis demography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allensworth

E. M.

Clark

(2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Educational Researcher, 49(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902110

Alon

Tienda

(2007). Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200401

American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. (2018, May 3). Overlooked inefficiencies in admissions that can impact yield. https://www.aacrao.org/research-publications/research/eye-on-research-blog/article/aacrao-consulting/2018/05/03/overlooked-inefficiencies-in-admissions-that-can-impact-yield

Andrews

R. J.

Imberman

S. A.

Lovenheim

M. F.

(2020). Recruiting and supporting low-income, high-achieving students at flagship universities. Economics of Education Review, 74, 101923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101923

Arcidiacono

Kinsler

Ransom

(2022). Recruit to reject? Harvard and African American applicants. Economics of Education Review, 88, 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102255

Baker

Klasik

Reardon

S. F.

(2018). Race and stratification in college enrollment over time. AERA Open, 4(1), 2332–8584. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417751896

Bastedo

M. N.

(2016). Cognitive repairs in the admissions office [Unpublished manuscript].

Bastedo

M. N.

Howard

J. E.

Flaster

(2016). Holistic admissions after affirmative action: Does “maximizing” the high school curriculum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 389–409. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716642407

Belkin

(2019, November 5). For sale: SAT-Takers’ names. Colleges buy student data and boost exclusivity. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-sale-sat-takers-names-colleges-buy-student-data-and-boost-exclusivity-11572976621

10.

Benjamin

(2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.

11.

Blake

M. K.

Langenkamp

A. G.

(2022). Differences between Latinx and White students in college-going behaviors. Research in Higher Education, 63(2), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09648-6

12.

Bonilla-Silva

(1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657316

13.

Brown

Burns

(2023, April 20). The link between student lists and direct admissions: Pros, cons, and policy implications. Medium. https://sheeoed.medium.com/the-link-between-student-lists-and-direct-admissions-pros-cons-and-policy-implications-166882543e39

14.

Burrell

Fourcade

(2021). The society of algorithms. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800

15.

Burrows

Gane

(2006). Geodemographics, software and class. Sociology, 40(5), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506067507

16.

Campbell

(2017, May 15). Higher education marketing: How to master your admissions funnel. Hop Online. https://hop-online.com/blog/higher-education-marketing-admissions-process/

17.

Cardona

Cudney

E. A.

Hoerl

Snyder

(2022). Data mining and machine learning retention models in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 25, 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120964920

18.

Castilla

E. J.

(2008). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1479–1526. https://doi.org/10.1086/588738

19.

Castleman

Goodman

(2018). Intensive college counseling and the enrollment and persistence of low-income students. Education Finance and Policy, 13(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00204

20.

Cheslock

J. J.

Kroc

(2012). Managing college enrollments. In Howard

Knight

McLaughlin

(Eds.), The handbook for institutional researchers (pp. 221–236). Jossey-Bass.

21.

Clinedinst

(2019). State of college admission. National Association for College Admission Counseling. https://www.nacacnet.org/state-of-college-admission-report/

22.

College Board. (2011). Segment Analysis Service: An educationally relevant geodemographic tagging service. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/mSSS/media/pdf/segment-analysis-service-overview.pdf

23.

College Board. (2015). PSAT/NMSQT: Understanding scores. https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/2015-psat-nmsqt-concordance-tables.pdf

24.

College Board. (2021). Introducing environmental attributes. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmTU9sb4ZiY

25.

College Board. (n.d.). College board search solutions. https://cbsearch.collegeboard.org/solutions

26.

Cotter

Medeiros

Pak

Thorson

(2021). “Reach the right people”: The politics of “interests” in Facebook’s classification system for ad targeting. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951721996046

27.

Cottom

T. M.

(2017). Lower ed: The troubling rise of for-profit colleges in the new economy. The New Press.

28.

Culliford

(2020, October 12). How political campaigns use your data: What campaigns know about U.S. voters and how they use it to shape their strategies. Reuters. https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION/DATA-VISUAL/yxmvjjgojvr/

29.

Cunha

J. M.

Miller

Weisburst

(2018). Information and college decisions: Evidence from the Texas GO Center project. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717739349

30.

Dache-Gerbino

Kiyama

J. M.

Sapp

V. T.

(2018). The dangling carrot: Proprietary institutions and the mirage of college choice for Latina students. The Review of Higher Education, 42(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0033

31.

Doyle

W. R.

(2010). Changes in institutional aid, 1992-2003: The evolving role of merit aid. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9177-0

32.

Duncan

O. D.

Ohlin

L. E.

Reiss

A. J.

Stanton

H. R.

(1953). Formal devices for making selection decisions. American Journal of Sociology, 58(6), 573–584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2772558

33.

Dynarski

Libassi

Michelmore

Owen

(2021). Closing the gap: The effect of reducing complexity and uncertainty in college pricing on the choices of low-income students. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1721–1756. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200451

34.

EAB. (2018). Making your digital ads count: 15 lessons on new and emerging techniques in undergraduate recruitment marketing.

35.

EAB. (2019). The 5 key stages of college enrollment—and which metrics to track during each. https://eab.com/insights/daily-briefing/enrollment/the-5-key-stages-of-college-enrollment-and-which-metrics-to-track-during-each/

36.

EAB. (2022). Starfish: Scale your student success efforts. https://eab.com/products/starfish/

37.

EAB. (2023). Financial aid optimization. https://eab.com/products/financial-aid-optimization/

38.

Encoura. (n.d.). Encoura. ACT. https://encoura.org/

39.

Equifax. (2023). Drive customer growth: Best practices for financial services firms to acquire the right customers and grow share. https://assets.equifax.com/marketing/US/assets/drive-customer-growth-ebook.pdf

40.

Experian. (2023). Mosaic: The best data powers the most robust segmentation. https://www.experian.com/content/dam/marketing/na/assets/ems/marketing-services/documents/product-sheets/mosaic-product-sheet.pdf

41.

Federal Trade Commission. (2014). Data brokers: A call for transparency and accountability. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability-report-federal-trade-commission-may-2014/140527databrokerreport.pdf

42.

Federal Trade Commission. (2016a). Big data: A tool for inclusion or exclusion? Understanding the issues. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/big-data-tool-inclusion-or-exclusion-understanding-issues/160106big-data-rpt.pdf

43.

Federal Trade Commission. (2016b). “Follow the lead” workshop. http://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/staff-perspective-follow-lead/staff_perspective_follow_the_lead_workshop.pdf

44.

Fire Engine RED. (2022). Data services: Search modeling. https://www.fire-engine-red.com/data-services/

45.

Green

P. C.

III Baker

B. D.

Oluwole

J. O.

(2021). School finance, race, and reparations. Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 27(2), 484–558. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj/vol27/iss2/7/

46.

Gurantz

Howell

Hurwitz

Larson

Pender

White

(2021). A national-level informational experiment to promote enrollment in selective colleges. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(2), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22262

47.

Harcourt

B. E.

(2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. The University of Chicago Press.

48.

Harris

C. I.

(1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341787

49.

Higher Education Act, 79. Stat. 1219., Pub. L. No. 89-329. (1965). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-765/pdf/COMPS-765.pdf

50.

Hirschman

Bosk

E. A.

(2020). Standardizing biases: Selection devices and the quantification of race. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649219844797

51.

Holland

M. M.

(2019). Divergent paths to college: Race, class, and inequality in high schools. Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813590288

52.

Hossler

Bean

J. P.

(1990). The strategic management of college enrollments. Jossey-Bass.

53.

Hossler

Bontrager

(2014). Handbook of strategic enrollment management. Jossey-Bass. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118819489.html

54.

Howell

Hurwitz

M. H.

Mabel

Smith

(2021). Participation in student search service is associated with higher college enrollment and completion. College Board. https://research.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/college-outreach-and-student-outcomes.pdf

55.

Hoxby

C. M.

(1997, December). How the changing market structure of U.S. higher education explains college tuition (Working Paper No. 6323). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w6323

56.

Hoxby

C. M.

(2009). The changing selectivity of American colleges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.4.95

57.

Hoxby

C. M.

Avery

(2013). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high merit students for highly selective colleges. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2013.0000

58.

Hurwitz

(2012). The impact of institutional grant aid on college choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(3), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712448957

59.

Hyman

(2017). ACT for all: The effect of mandatory college entrance exams on postsecondary attainment and choice. Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00206

60.

Jackson

B. A.

Reynolds

J. R.

(2013). The price of opportunity: Race, student loan debt, and college achievement. Sociological Inquiry, 83(3), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12012

61.

James Madison University. (2017). Commonwealth of Virginia standard contract (Contract no. UCPJMU4648). Ruffalo Noel Levitz.

62.

Jaquette

Han

Castaneda

(2023). The private school network: Recruiting visits to private high schools by public and private universities [Unpublished manuscript].

63.

Jaquette

Salazar

K. G.

(2022). Student list policy: Problems, regulations, and a solution. The Institute for College Access & Success. https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Student-list-policy_problems_regulations_a_solution.pdf

64.

Jaquette

Salazar

K. G.

Martin

(2022). The student list business: Primer and market dynamics. The Institute for College Access & Success. https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/The-Student-List-Business_-Primer-and-Market-Dynamics.pdf

65.

Jillson

(2021, April 19). Aiming for truth, fairness, and equity in your company’s use of AI. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2021/04/aiming-truth-fairness-equity-your-companys-use-ai

66.

Khan

S. R.

(2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton University Press.

67.

Killgore

(2009). Merit and competition in selective college admissions. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0083

68.

Kolluri

(2018). Advanced placement: The dual challenge of equal access and effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 671–711. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318787268

69.

Korver-Glenn

(2018). Compounding inequalities: How racial stereotypes and discrimination accumulate across the stages of housing exchange. American Sociological Review, 83(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418781774

70.

Korver-Glenn

(2022). Race brokers: Housing markets and racial segregation in 21st century urban America. Oxford University Press.

71.

Kraatz

M. S.

Ventresca

M. J.

Deng

L. N.

(2010). Precarious values and mundane innovations: Enrollment management in american liberal arts colleges. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1521–1545. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57319260

72.

Kraus

M. W.

Onyeador

I. N.

Daumeyer

N. M.

Rucker

J. M.

Richeson

J. A.

(2019). The misperception of racial economic inequality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619863049

73.

Krippner

G. R.

Hirschman

(2022). The person of the category: The pricing of risk and the politics of classification in insurance and credit. Theory & Society, 51(5), 685–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09500-5

74.

Leeds

D. M.

DesJardins

S. L.

(2015). The effect of merit aid on enrollment: A regression discontinuity analysis of iowa’s national scholars award. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9359-2

75.

Leyshon

Thrift

(1999). Lists come alive: Electronic systems of knowledge and the rise of credit-scoring in retail banking. Economy and Society, 28(3), 434–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149900000013

76.

Long

M. C.

(2008). College quality and early adult outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.004

77.

MacLeod

W. B.

Riehl

Saavedra

J. E.

Urquiola

(2017). The big sort: College reputation and labor market outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 223–261. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160126

78.

MacMilan

Anderson

(2019, October 14). Student tracking, secret scores: How college admissions offices rank prospects before they apply. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/10/14/colleges-quietly-rank-prospective-students-based-their-personal-data/

79.

McElhatton

(2004, October 31). Secrets of my success: Richard Webber, founder of geodemographics. Campaign Live UK. https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/secrets-success-richard-webber-founder-geodemographics/226747

80.

McPherson

M. S.

Schapiro

M. O.

(1998). The student aid game. Princeton University Press.

81.

Moore

(2017). Do students who opt into ACT’s educational opportunity service (EOS) enroll in college at higher rates? ACT, Inc. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/R1652-benefits-of-act-eos-opt-in-2017-08.pdf

82.

Mulhern

(2021). Changing college choices with personalized admissions information at scale: Evidence on naviance. Journal of Labor Economics, 39(1), 219–262. https://doi.org/10.1086/708839

83.

Nichols

T. P.

Garcia

(2022). Platform studies in education. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.209

84.

Niu

S. X.

Tienda

(2010). Minority student academic performance under the uniform admission law: Evidence from the University of Texas at Austin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709360063

85.

Noble

S. U.

(2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.

86.

Norris

(2023a). Embedding racism: City government credit ratings and the institutionalization of race in markets. Social Problems, 70, 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab066

87.

Norris

(2023b). The illusion of transparency: The political double standard in city credit ratings. Socio-Economic Review, 21, 1125–1150. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac016

88.

O’Neil

(2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (1st ed.). Crown.

89.

Odle

T. K.

Delaney

J. A.

(2022). You are admitted! Early evidence on enrollment from Idaho’s direct admissions system. Research in Higher Education, 63(6), 899–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09675-x

90.

Park

J. J.

Becks

A. H.

(2015). Who benefits from SAT prep? An examination of high school context and race/ethnicity. The Review of Higher Education, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2015.0038

91.

Poon

(2007). Scorecards as devices for consumer credit: The case of Fair, Isaac & Company Incorporated. Sociological Review, 55, 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00740.x

92.

Posecznick

(2017). Selling hope and college: Merit, markets, and recruitment in an unranked school. Cornell University Press.

93.

Posselt

J. R.

(2016). Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. Harvard University Press.

94.

Posselt

J. R.

Jaquette

Bielby

Bastedo

M. N.

(2012). Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972-2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1074–1111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212439456

95.

Reardon

S. F.

Kalogrides

Shores

(2019). The geography of racial/ethnic test score gaps. American Journal of Sociology, 124(4), 1164–1221. https://doi.org/10.1086/700678

96.

Reber

Smith

(2023, January 23). College enrollment disparities: Understanding the role of academic preparation. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/college-enrollment-disparities/

97.

Rivard

(2013, October 23). Micro-targeting students: Increasingly sophisticated data slicing tools are changing student recruitment. Who benefits? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/10/24/political-campaign-style-targeting-comes-student-search?width=775&height=500&iframe=true

98.

Rodriguez

Hernandez-Hamed

(2020). Understanding unfulfilled AP potential across the participation pipeline by race and income. Teachers College Record, 122(9), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200909

99.

Rodriguez

McGuire

K. M.

(2019). More classes, more access? Understanding the effects of course offerings on Black-White gaps in Advanced Placement course-taking. The Review of Higher Education, 42(2), 641–679. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0010

100.

Rosinger

K. O.

Sarita Ford

Choi

(2021). The role of selective college admissions criteria in interrupting or reproducing racial and economic inequities. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1795504

101.

Rothstein

(2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing.

102.

Ruffalo Noel Levitz. (2018). 2018 marketing and student recruitment report of effective practices. http://learn.ruffalonl.com/rs/395-EOG-977/images/RNL_2018_Student_Recruitment_Marketing_Report_EM-19.pdf

103.

Ruffalo Noel Levitz. (2021). RNL student search and engagement. https://www.ruffalonl.com/enrollment-management-solutions/building-demand/student-search-and-engagement/

104.

Ruffalo Noel Levitz. (2022a). 2022 cost of recruiting an undergraduate student report. https://www.ruffalonl.com/thank-you/download-the-2022-cost-of-recruiting-an-undergraduate-student-report/

105.

Ruffalo Noel Levitz. (2022b). 2022 marketing and recruitment practices for undergraduate students report. https://www.ruffalonl.com/papers-research-higher-education-fundraising/marketing-and-recruitment-practices-for-undergraduate-students/

106.

Salazar

K. G.

(2022). Recruitment redlining by public research universities in the Los Angeles and Dallas metropolitan areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 93, 585–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.2004811

107.

Salazar

K. G.

Jaquette

Han

(2021). Coming soon to a neighborhood near you? Off-campus recruiting by public research universities. American Educational Research Journal, 58(6), 1270–1314. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211001810

108.

Salazar

K. G.

Jaquette

Han

(2022). Geodemographics of student list purchases by public universities: A first look. The Institute for College Access & Success. https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Geodemographics-of-Student-List-Purchases_A-First-Look.pdf

109.

Schmidt

(2019). Prospect search filters. Encoura. https://helpcenter.encoura.org/hc/en-us/articles/360035260452-Prospect-Search-Filters-

110.

Schmidt

(2022). Prospect search filters. Encoura. https://helpcenter.encoura.org/hc/en-us/articles/360035260452-Prospect-Search-Filters-

111.

Shamsuddin

(2016). Berkeley or bust? Estimating the causal effect of college selectivity on bachelor’s degree completion. Research in Higher Education, 57(7), 795–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9408-0

112.

Singer

(1988). Behind the flood of mail: Name brokers. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/24/nyregion/behind-the-flood-of-mail-name-brokers.html

113.

Smith

Howell

Hurwitz

(2022). The impact of college outreach on high schoolers’ college choices: Results from over one thousand natural experiments. Education Finance and Policy, 17(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00334

114.

Stevens

M. L.

(2007). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Harvard University Press.

115.

Tiako

M. J. N.

South

Ray

(2021). Medical schools as racialized organizations: A primer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(8), 1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.7326/m21-0369

116.

Tough

(2019, September 10). What college admissions officers really want. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/10/magazine/college-admissions-paul-tough.html

117.

U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Requirements and responsibilities for third-party servicers and institutions. https://fsapartners.ed.gov/knowledge-center/library/dear-colleague-letters/2023-02-15/requirements-and-responsibilities-third-party-servicers-and-institutions-updated-feb-28-2023

118.

U.S. Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Questions and answers regarding the Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College and University of North Carolina. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/ocr-questionsandanswers-tvi-20230814.pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=

119.

Waxman

(2019, February 27). The power of list segmentation part I: Are you already doing this? Intead, Global & Local Academic Branding. https://services.intead.com/blog/the-power-of-list-segmentation-part-i-are-you-already-doing-this

120.

Webber

(1988, August). Exploiting marketing opportunities. Credit Management, 36–37.

121.

Winston

G. C.

(1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.13.1.13

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.12 MB

A Sociological Analysis of Structural Racism in “Student List” Lead Generation Products

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material