Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A pervasive issue in the school choice literature is whether schools of choice cream skim students by enrolling high-achieving, less-challenging, or less-costly students. Similarly, schools of choice may “push out” low-achieving, more-challenging, or more-costly students. Using longitudinal student-level data from Indiana, we created multiple measures to examine whether there is evidence consistent with the claims of voucher-participating private schools cream skimming the best students from public schools or pushing out voucher-receiving students. We do not find evidence consistent with the claim of cream skimming. However, we find evidence consistent with the claim of private schools pushing out the lowest-achieving voucher students. This is the first study to examine these two issues within a statewide private school voucher program.

Keywords

educational policy private education elementary schools middle schools descriptive analysis school vouchers school choice selective enrollment cream skimming pushout

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berliner

D. C.

Glass

G. V.

(2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. Teachers College Press.

Carlson

D. E.

Cowen

J. M.

Fleming

D. J.

(2013). Life after vouchers: What happens to students who leave private schools for the traditional public sector? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 179–199.

Cowen

J. M.

Fleming

D. J.

Witte

J. F.

Wolf

P. J.

(2012). Going public: Who leaves a large, longstanding, and widely available urban voucher program? American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 231–256.

Epple

D. E.

Romano

R. E.

(1998). Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 33–62.

Fleming

D. J.

Cowen

J. M.

Witte

J. F.

Wolf

P. J.

(2015). Similar students, different choices: Who uses a school voucher in an otherwise similar population of students? Education and Urban Society, 47(7), 785–812.

Indiana Department of Education. (2022). Choice scholarship program annual report: Participation and payment data.

Kho

Zimmer

McEachin

(2022). A descriptive analysis of cream skimming and pushout in choice versus traditional public schools. Education, Finance, and Policy, 17(1), 160–187.

Ravitch

(2010). The death and life of the great American school system. Basic Books.

Ravitch

(2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. Random House.

10.

Winters

M. A.

(2017). New York charter schools outperform traditional selective schools: More evidence that cream-skimming is not driving charters’ success. Manhattan Institute.

11.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Witte

(2011). Charter schools: Do they cream skim, increasing student segregation? In Berends

Springer

M. G.

Ballou

Walberg

(Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 215–232). Harvard Education Press.

12.

Zimmer

Guarino

(2013). Is there empirical evidence consistent with the claim that charter schools “push out” low performing students? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 461–480.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB

Cream Skimming and Pushout of Students Participating in a Statewide Private School Voucher Program

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material