This study examines the effects of English Learner (EL) status on subsequent Special Education (SPED) placement. Through a research-practice partnership, we link student demographic data and initial English proficiency assessment data across seven cohorts of test takers and observe EL and SPED programmatic participation for these students over 7 years. Our regression discontinuity (RD) estimates at the English proficiency margin consistently differ substantively from positive associations generated through regression analyses. RD evidence indicates that EL status had no effect on SPED placement at the English proficiency threshold. Grade-by-grade and subgroup RD analyses at this margin suggest that ELs were modestly underidentified for SPED during Grade 5 and that ELs whose primary language was Spanish were underidentified for SPED.
AlbusD.ThurlowM. (2013). 2012-13 publicly reported assessment results for students with disabilities and ELLs with disabilities. National Center on Educational Outcomes.
2.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
3.
ArtilesA. J.RuedaR.SalazarJ. J.HigaredaI. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 283–300.
4.
BerkeleyS.ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995-2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 423–436.
5.
BurrE. (2019). Guidance manuals for educators of English learners with disabilities: Ideas and lessons from the field. National Center on Educational Outcomes.
CalonicoS.CattaneoM. D.TitiunikR. (2014). Robust data-driven inference in the regression-discontinuity design. Stata Journal, 14(4), 909–946.
8.
CarlsonD.KnowlesJ. E. (2016). The effect of English language learner reclassification on student ACT scores, high school graduation, and postsecondary enrollment: Regression discontinuity evidence from Wisconsin. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21908
Cioè-PeñaM. (2017a). Bilingualism, disability and what it means to be normal. Journal of Bilingual Education Research & Instruction, 19(1), 138–160.
12.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2017b). The intersectional gap: How bilingual students in the United States are excluded from inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 906–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1296032
13.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2020a). Planning inclusion: The need to formalize parental participation in individual education plans (and meetings). Educational Forum, 84(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1812970
14.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2020b). Raciolinguistics and the education of emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled. Urban Review, 53, 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00581-z
15.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 Pub. L. No. 3102 (2015-2016). (2015).
16.
FaganD. S.Pentón HerreraL. J. (2022). Supporting English learners with supporting English learners with disabilities. The State Education Standard, 22(1), 26–31.
17.
FigueroaR. A.NewsomeP. (2006). The diagnosis of LD in English learners: Is it nondiscriminatory?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00222194060390030201
18.
Greenberg MotamediJ.CoxM.WilliamsJ.DeussenT. (2016). Examining the representation of English learners in special education in Washington State. Education Northwest, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest.
19.
HibelJ.JasperA. D. (2012). Delayed special education placement for learning disabilities among children of immigrants. Social Forces, 91(2), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos092
20.
Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act. (2004).
21.
JohnsonA. (2019). The effects of English learner classification on high school graduation and college attendance. AERA Open, 5(2), 1–23.
22.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE.HarryB.ZionS.TateW.DuránG. Z.RileyD. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1–43.
23.
MacswanJ.RolstadK. (2006). How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: Implications for English language learner placement in special education. Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2304–2328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00783.x
24.
McCraryJ. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005
25.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.CookM.StrassfeldN. M.HillemeierM. M.PunW. H.SchusslerD. L. (2017). Are black children disproportionately overrepresented in special education? A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.3102/0014402916664042
26.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.CookM.StrassfeldN. M.HillemeierM. M.PunW. H.WangY.SchusslerD. L. (2018). Are Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or language-minority children overrepresented in special education?Exceptional Children, 84(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.3102/0014402917748303
27.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MattisonR.MaczugaS.LiH.CookM. (2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15591157
28.
MorganP. L.FriscoM. L.FarkasG.HibelJ. (2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. Journal of Special Education, 43(4), 236–254.
29.
National Council on Disability. (2018). Broken promises: The underfunding of IDEA.
30.
OrtizA. A.PolyzoiE. (1986). Characteristics of limited English proficient Hispanic students in programs for the learning disabled: Implications for policy, practice and research. Part 1. Report summary. US Department of Education.
31.
PapayJ. P.WillettJ. B.MurnaneR. J. (2011). High-school exit examinations and the schooling decisions of teenagers: A multi-dimensional regression-discontinuity analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 1–27.
32.
ParkS. (2014). Bilingualism and children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Issues, research, and implications. NYS TESOL Journal, 1(2), 122–129.
33.
ParkS. (2019a). Beyond underrepresentation: Constructing disability with Young Asian American children to preserve the “model minority” stereotype. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 13(3), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.17206/apjrece.2019.13.3.73
34.
ParkS. (2019b). Disentangling language from disability: Teacher implementation of Tier 1 English language development policies for ELs with suspected disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.004
35.
ParkS. (2020). Demystifying disproportionality: Exploring educator beliefs about special education referrals for English learners. Teachers College Record, 122(5), 210–234.
PasternackR. (2014). Reinventing special education: Closing the gap between disabled and non-disabled students. Accelify Consulting.
38.
PorterK. E.ReardonS. F.UnluF.BloomH. S.CimpianJ. R. (2017). Estimating causal effects of education interventions using a two-rating regression discontinuity design: Lessons from a simulation study and an application. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 138–167.
39.
ReardonS. F.RobinsonJ. P. (2012). Regression discontinuity designs with multiple rating-score variables. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.609583
40.
RobinsonJ. P. (2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711407912
41.
Robinson-CimpianJ. P.ThompsonK. D. (2016). The effects of changing test-based policies for reclassifying English learners. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21882
SchwartzA. E.HopkinsB. G.StiefelL. (2021). The effects of special education on the academic performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(2), 480–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22282
44.
ShifrerD. (2013). Stigma of a label: Educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.3102/0022146513503346
45.
ShinN. (2018). The effects of the initial English language learner classification on students’ later academic outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717737378
46.
SullivanA. L.BalA. (2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on disability risk. Exceptional Children, 79(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.3102/001440291307900406
47.
ThistlewaiteD. L.CampbellD. T. (1960). Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex-post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 309–317.
48.
ThurlowM. L.QuenemoenR. F.LazarusS. S. (2006). Meeting the needs of special education students: Recommendations for the race to the top consortia and states. College and Research Libraries News, 67(9), 548–550.
49.
UmanskyI. M. (2016a). Leveled and exclusionary tracking: English learners’ access to academic content in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1792–1833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216675404
50.
UmanskyI. M. (2016b). To be or not to be EL: An examination of the impact of classifying students as English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 714–737. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716664802
51.
UmanskyI. M.ThompsonK. D.DíazG. (2017). Using an ever-English learner framework to examine disproportionality in special education. Exceptional Children, 84(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.3102/0014402917707470
52.
UmanskyI. M.Vasquez CanoM.PorterL. M. (2021). Resource for self-determination or perpetuation of linguistic imposition: Examining the impact of English learner classification among Alaska Native students (No. 21-420; EdWorkingPaper). Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
53.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Table 204.30: Children 3 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by disability: Selected years, 1976-77 through 2011-12. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Digest of Education Statistics (2013 ed.).
54.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Non-regulatory guidance: English learners and Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
WangM.LamY. (2017). Evidence-based practice in special education and cultural adaptations: Challenges and implications for research. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 53–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
