California policymakers passed the Student Equity Policy, requiring all community colleges to develop a “student equity plan” that identified outcome disparities for select student groups, including racial/ethnic students. Through an instrumental case study, I examined Huerta College because their equity plan stood out for its focus on addressing Latinx transfer inequity. I spent two years interviewing implementers, observing equity meetings, and collecting documents that served as artifacts of implementation. Key to equity planning was a critical mass of Latinx practitioners able to see the policy as an opportunity to tackle one of the greatest inequities on their campus, Latinx transfer. They used the implementation process to propose new projects that would support Latinx students in their journey to transfer from Huerta.
Acevedo-GilN.SantosR. E.AlonsoL. I.SolórzanoD. G. (2015). Latinas/os in community college developmental education: Increasing moments of academic and interpersonal validation. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715572893
2.
AllanJ. L.SniehottaF. F.JohnstonM. (2013). The best laid plans: Planning skill determines the effectiveness of action plans and implementation intentions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9483-9
3.
BakerD. J. (2019). Pathways to racial equity in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Educational Research Journal, 56, 1861–1895. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219833918
4.
BellD. (2004). Silent covenants: Brown v. board of education and the unfilled hopes for racial reform. Oxford University Press.
5.
BensimonE. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469.
6.
BensimonE. M. (2012). The equity scorecard: Theory of change. In BensimonE. M.MalcomL. (Eds.), Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice (pp. 17–44). Stylus.
7.
BensimonE. M.DowdA. C. (2009). Dimensions of the transfer choice gap: Experiences of Latina and Latino students who navigated transfer pathways. Harvard Education Review79(4), 632–659.
8.
BradyM. P.DuffyM.Lou HazelkornM.BucholzJ. L. (2014). Policy and systems change: Planning for unintended consequences. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(3), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.891882
9.
BrittonT. (2019). The best laid plans: Postsecondary educational expectations and college enrollment in Massachusetts. The Journal of Higher Education, 90, 940–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1590294
10.
byrdd. (2019). The diversity distraction: A critical comparative analysis of discourse in higher education scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0048
11.
CalderónD.BernalD.HuberL.MalagónM.VélezV. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82(4), 513–539. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.4.l518621577461p68
CapperC. A.YoungM. D. (2015). The equity audit as the core of leading increasingly diverse schools and districts. In TheoharisG.ScanlanM. (Eds.), Leadership for increasingly diverse schools (pp. 186–197). Routledge.
15.
ChanceS.WilliamsB. T. (2009). Assessing university strategic plans: A tool for consideration. Educational Planning: The Journal of the International Society for Educational Planning, 18(1), 38–54.
16.
CharmazK. (2009). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
17.
ChaseM. M. (2016). Culture, politics, and policy interpretation: How practitioners make sense of a transfer policy in a 2-year college. Educational Policy, 30(7), 959–998.
18.
ChaseM. M.DowdA. C.PazichL. B.BensimonE. M. (2012). Transfer equity for “minoritized” students: A critical policy analysis of seven states. Educational Policy, 28(5), 669–717.
19.
ChingC. D.FelixE. R.CastroM. C.TrinidadA. (2018). Achieving racial equity from the bottom up? The student equity policy in the California community colleges. Education Policy, 34, 819–863. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0895904818802092
20.
CoburnC. E. (2016). What’s policy got to do with it? How the structure-agency debate can illuminate policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 122, 465–4753. https://doi.org/10.1086/685847
21.
CohenD. K.MehtaJ. D. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644–690. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217700078
22.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2013). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (4th ed.). SAGE.
23.
DonaldsonM. L.WoulfinS. (2018). From tinkering to going “rogue”: How principals use agency when enacting new teacher evaluation systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718784205
24.
DowdA. C.BensimonE. M. (2015). Engaging the race question: Accountability and equity in U.S. higher education. Teachers College Press.
DumasM. J.AnyonJ. (2006). Toward a critical approach to education policy implementation. Implications for the (battle)field. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 149–168). SUNY Press.
28.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago University Press.
29.
FalquetoJ. M. Z.HoffmannV. E.GomesR. C.MoriS. S. O. (2019). Strategic planning in higher education institutions: What are the stakeholders’ roles in the process?Higher Education, 79, 1039–1056.
30.
FelixE. R. (2020). Using state policy to improve Latinx transfer outcomes in California. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 14(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.24974/amae.14.1.332
31.
FelixE. R.RamirezR. (2020). Counterstories of policy implementation: Using reform to address Latinx student equity. Journal of Latinos and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2020.1782205
32.
FelixE. R.TrinidadA. (2020). The decentralization of race: Tracing the dilution of racial equity in educational policy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1681538
33.
FelixE. R.TrinidadA.ChingC. D.BensimonE. M. (2018). California’s student equity plans policy: An unexploited opportunity among Hispanic-serving community colleges. In de los SantosA. G.KellerG. F.TannenbaumR.AceredaA. (Eds.), Moving forward: Policies, planning, and promoting access of Hispanic college students (pp. 75–94). Bilingual Press.
HackmanD. G.MalinJ. R.BraggD. D. (2019). An analysis of college and career readiness emphasis in ESSA state accountability plans. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(160), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4441
36.
HarperS. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29.
37.
HarperS. R. (2015). Success in these schools? Visual counternarratives of young men of color and urban high schools they attend. Urban Education, 50(2), 139–169.
38.
HarperS. R.PattonL.WoodenO. S. (2009). Access and equity for African American students in higher education: A critical race historical analysis of policy efforts. Journal of Higher Education, 80(4), 389–414.
39.
HatchD. K.Mardock-UmanN.GarciaC. E.JohnsonM. (2018). Best laid plans: How community college student success courses work. Community College Review, 46(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552118760191
40.
HillH. C. (2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 289–318.
41.
HurtadoS.AlvarezC. L.Guillermo-WannC.CuellarM.ArellanoL. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In SmartJ. C.PaulsenM. B. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41–122). Springer International.
42.
KezarA. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. Routledge.
43.
KezarA.EckelP. D. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777159
44.
KingdonJ. W. (2014). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Pearson.
45.
KoyamaJ. (2015). When things come undone: The promise of dissembling education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 548–559.
46.
LenhoffS. W.UlmerJ. B. (2016). Reforming for “all” or for “some”: Misalignment in the discourses of education reformers and implementers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, Article 108. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2273
47.
LevinsonB. A.SuttonM.WinsteadT. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. http://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676
48.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2016). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrive in good schools. Oxford University Press.
49.
LongA. (2016). Overcoming educational racism in the community college: Creating pathways to success for minority and impoverished student populations. Stylus.
50.
LukerK. (2010). Salsa dancing into the social sciences: Research in an age of info-glut. Harvard University Press.
51.
MalcomL. (2013). Student diversity in community colleges: Examining trends and understanding the challenges. In LevinJ. S.KanterS. T. (Eds.), Understanding community colleges (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
52.
MalenB.RiceJ. K.MatlachL. K. B.BowsherA.HoyerK. M.HydeL. H. (2015). Developing organizational capacity for implementing complex education reform initiatives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(1), 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14522482
53.
Martinez-WenzlM.MarquezR. (2012). Unrealized promises: Unequal access, affordability, and excellence at community colleges in Southern California. The UCLA Civil Rights Project. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/23c5m52j
54.
MattheisA. (2016). A mashup of policy tools and CDA as a framework for educational policy inquiry. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1170618
55.
McDonnellL. M.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133–152.
56.
McLaughlinM. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737009002171
57.
McLaughlinM. W. (2006). Beyond “misery research”: New opportunities for implementation research, policy, and practice. In SugrueC. (Ed.), The future of educational change: International perspectives (pp. 175–190). Routledge.
58.
MerriamS. B. (2011). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
59.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
60.
MorimotoY.GuillaumeR. O. (2018). Reconceptualizing strategic planning: Planning strategically for student success. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 25(2), 23–30.
61.
NeumannA. (2006). Profession passion: Emotion in the scholarship of professors at research universities. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 381–424.
62.
NeumannA.PallasA. M. (2015). Critical policy analysis, the craft of qualitative research, and analysis of data on the Texas top 10% law. In Martinez AlemanA. M.PusserB.BensimonE. M. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 153–173). Johns Hopkins University Press.
63.
NienhusserH. K. (2014). Role of community colleges in the implementations of postsecondary education enrollment polices for undocumented students. Community College Review, 42(1), 3–22.
64.
NienhusserH. K. (2018). Higher education institutional agents as policy implementers: The case of policies that affect undocumented and DACAmented students. The Review of Higher Education, 41(3), 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0014
65.
OakesJ.LiptonM. (2002). Struggling for educational equity in diverse communities: School reform as social movement. International Journal of Educational Change, 3, 383–406.
66.
OakesJ.WelnerK.YonezawaS.AllenR. L. (2005). Norms and politics of equity-minded change: Researching the “zone of mediation.” In FullanM. (Ed.), Fundamental change: International handbook of educational change (pp. 282–305). Springer.
67.
PattonL. D.HarperS. R.HarrisJ. C. (2015). Using critical race theory to (re)interpret widely-studied topics in U.S. higher education. In Martinez-AlemanA. M.BensimonE. M.PusserB. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 193–219). Johns Hopkins University Press.
68.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
69.
ReddingC.SearbyL. (2020). The map is not the territory: Considering the role of school improvement plans in turnaround schools. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 23(3), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458920938854
ScheinE. H. (1990). Organizational culture. The American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.
72.
SkrlaL.McKenzieK. B.ScheurichJ. J. (2009). Using equity audits to create equitable and excellent schools. Corwin Press.
73.
SlayK. E.ReyesK. A.PosseltJ. R. (2019). Bait and switch: Representation, climate, and tensions of diversity work in graduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0052
74.
SolizA. (2018). The Effects of the expansion of for-profit colleges on student enrollments and outcomes at community colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795053
75.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). SAGE.
76.
StrunkK. O.MarshJ. A.Bush-MecenasS. C.DuqueM. R. (2016). The best laid plans an examination of school plan quality and implementation in a school improvement initiative. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 259–309.
77.
SunM.PennerE. K.LoebS. (2017). Resource- and approach-driven multidimensional change: Three-year effects of school improvement grants. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695790
78.
TrujilloT. M. (2012). The politics of district instructional policy formation compromising equity and rigor. Educational Policy, 27(3), 531–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812454000
79.
WalcottH. F. (2009). Writing up qualitative research. SAGE.
80.
WeertsD. J.FreedG. F.MorphewC. C. (2014). Organizational identity in higher education: Conceptual and empirical perspectives. In BastedoM. N. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 29, pp. 229–278). Springer.
81.
WilsonJ. L. (2018). A framework for planning organizational diversity: Applying multicultural practice in higher education work settings. Planning for Higher Education, 46(3), 1–9.
