Most community college students are referred to developmental education courses to build basic skills. These students often struggle in these courses and college more broadly. CUNY Start is a prematriculation program for students assessed as having significant remedial needs. CUNY Start students delay matriculation for one semester and receive time-intensive instruction in math, reading, and writing with a prescribed pedagogy delivered by trained teachers. The program aims to help students complete remediation and prepare for college-level courses. This article describes the results of an experiment at four community colleges (n ~ 3,800). We estimate that over 3 years, including one semester that students spent in the program and two-and-a-half years after the program was complete, CUNY Start substantially increased college readiness, slightly increased credit accumulation, and modestly increased graduation rates (by increasing participation in CUNY’s highly effective Accelerated Study in Associate Programs [ASAP]).
AdelmanC. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education, 1972–2000. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AngristJ. D.AutorD.HudsonS.PallaisA. (2014). Leveling up: Early results from a randomized evaluation of post-secondary aid (NBER working paper series, no. 20800). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AngristJ. D.ImbensG. W.RubinD. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455.
4.
AngristJ. D.OreopoulosP.WilliamsT. (2010). When opportunity knocks, who answers? New evidence on college achievement awards (NBER working paper series, no. 16643). National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
AttewellP. A.LavinD. E.DominaT.LeveyT. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924.
6.
AveryC.HowellJ.PageL. (2014). A review of the role of college counseling, coaching, and mentoring on students’ postsecondary outcomes. College Board.
7.
BaileyT. R.BashfordJ.BoatmanA.SquiresJ.WeissM.DoyleW.ValentineJ. C.LaSotaR.PolaninJ. R.SpinneyE.WilsonW.YeideM.YoungS. H. (2016). Strategies for postsecondary students in developmental education. Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse.
8.
BaileyT. R.JaggarsS. S.JenkinsD. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Harvard University Press.
9.
BaileyT. R.JeongD. W.ChoS.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255–270.
BarrA.CastlemanB. (2017). The bottom line on college counseling [Working paper]. Texas A&M University.
12.
BaumS.KuroseC.McPhersonM. (2013). An overview of American higher education. Future of Children, 23(1), 17–39.
13.
BettingerE. P.BakerR. B. (2014). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 3–19.
14.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T. (2005). Remediation at the community college: Student participation and outcomes. New Directions for Community Colleges, Number, 129, 17–26.
15.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work?Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 736–771.
16.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2012). The role of simplification and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242.
17.
BickerstaffS.EdgecombeN. (2012). Pathways to faculty learning and pedagogical improvement. Inside Out, 1(3), 1–4.
18.
BickerstaffS.EdgecombeN. (2019). Teaching matters and so does curriculum: How CUNY Start reshaped instruction for students referred to developmental mathematics (CCRC working paper no. 110). Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
19.
BloomH. S. (1984). Accounting for no-shows in experimental evaluation designs. Evaluation Review, 8(2), 225–246.
20.
BloomH. S.BellA.ReimanK. (2020). Using data from randomized trials to assess the likely generalizability of educational treatment-effect estimates from regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(3), 488–517.
21.
BoatmanA.LongB. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58.
22.
BraggD. D.BarnettE. (2009). Lessons learned from breaking through: In brief. Office of Community College Research and Leadership, College of Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
23.
BraxtonJ. M. (2002). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Vanderbilt University Press.
24.
CalcagnoJ. C.BaileyT.JenkinsD.KienzlG.LeinbachT. (2008). Community college student success: What institutional characteristics make a difference?Economics of Education Review, 27, 632–645.
CohodesS. R.GoodmanJ. S. (2014). Merit aid, college quality, and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams Scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 251–285.
27.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8(1). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a178530.pdf
28.
Community College Research Center. (forthcoming). Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of CUNY Start [Manuscript in publication]. Columbia University.
City University of New York Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2015). Three-year graduation rates of full-time, first-time freshmen enrolled in associate or certificate programs by gender: Fall 2011 entering cohort. City University of New York.
34.
City University of New York Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2018). Total enrollment by undergraduate and graduate level, full-time/part-time attendance, and college. City University of New York.
DemingD.DynarskiS. (2009). Into college, out of poverty? Policies to increase the postsecondary attainment of the poor (NBER working paper no. 15387). National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
EdgecombeN.JaggarsS. S.BakerE. D.BaileyT. (2013). Acceleration through a holistic support model: An implementation and outcomes analysis of FastStart@CCD. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
38.
EvansW. N.KearneyM. S.PerryB. C.SullivanJ. X. (2017). Increasing community college completion rates among low-income students: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial evaluation of a case management intervention (NBER working paper no. 24150). National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
GinderS. A.Kelly-ReidJ. E.MannF. B. (2015). Graduation rates for selected cohorts, 2006-11; student financial aid in postsecondary institutions, academic year 2013-14; and admissions in postsecondary institutions, fall 2014; first look [Provisional data]. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
40.
Goldrick-RabS.KelchenR.HarrisD. N.BensonJ. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121(6), 1762–1817.
41.
GrahamS.HebertM. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading (Carnegie Corporation time to act report). Alliance for Excellent Education.
42.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007a). What we know, what we still need to know: Teaching adolescents to write. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 313–335.
43.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school. Alliance for Excellent Education.
44.
GrubbW. N.GabrinerR. (2013). Basic skills education in community colleges: Inside and outside of classrooms. Routledge.
45.
HiebertJ.GallimoreR.GarnierH.GivvinK. B.HollingsworthH.JacobsJ.Miu-Ying ChuiA.WearneD.SmithM.KerstingN.ManasterA.TsengE.EtterbeekW.ManasterC.GonzalesP.StiglerJ. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
46.
HodaraM. (2015). The effects of English as a second language courses on language minority community college students. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 243–270.
47.
HollandP. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.
48.
ImbensG. W.AngristJ. D. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467–475.
49.
JenkinsD.JaggarsS. S.RoksaJ. (2009). Promoting gatekeeper course success among community college students needing remediation: Findings and recommendations from a Virginia study [Summary report]. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
50.
JenkinsD.SperoniC.BelfieldC.JaggarsS. S.EdgecombeN. (2010). A model for accelerating academic success of community college remedial English students: Is the Accelerated Learning Program (ALP) effective and affordable? (CCRC working paper series). Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
51.
KempleJ. J.HerlihyC. M.SmithT. J. (2005). Making progress toward graduation: Evidence from the talent development high school model. MDRC.
52.
KimJ.SimonM.HorensteinA.WebberA. (in press). CUNY Start: A resource guide for reforming developmental education in the college transition space. City University of New York.
53.
LevinH. M.McEwanP. J.BelfieldC.BowdenA. B.ShandR. (2017). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis. SAGE.
54.
LogueA. W.DouglasD.Watanabe-RoseM. (2019). Corequisite mathematics remediation: Results over time and in different contexts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 294–315.
55.
MayerA. K.PatelR.RuddT.RatledgeA. (2015). Designing scholarships to improve college success. MDRC.
56.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.ZhangJ.WangX.WangK.HeinS.DilibertiM.Forrest CataldiE.Bullock MannF.BarmerA. (2019). The condition of education 2019. National Center for Education Statistics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for high school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
59.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common core state standards. Council of Chief State School Officers.
60.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. U.S. Department of Education.
61.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
62.
National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2019). Term enrollment estimates: Fall 2019. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.
63.
NomiT.AllensworthE. (2009). “Double-dose” algebra as an alternative strategy to remediation: Effects on students’ academic outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 111–148.
64.
OreopoulosP.PetronijevicU. (2016). Student coaching: How far can technology go? (NBER working paper 22630). National Bureau of Economic Research.
65.
PerinD. (2013). Literacy skills among academically underprepared students. Community College Review, 41(2), 118–136.
66.
Richburg-HayesL.VisherM. G.BloomD. (2008). Do learning communities effect academic outcomes? Evidence from an experiment in a community college. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(1), 33–65.
67.
RobbinsR. (2013). Implications of advising load. In CarlstromA. (Ed.), 2011 National survey of academic advising (Monograph no. 25). National Academic Advising Association.
68.
RutschowE.MayerA. (2018). Early findings from a national survey of developmental education practices. Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness, Teachers College, Columbia University.
69.
RutschowE.SchneiderE. (2011). Unlocking the gate: What we know about improving developmental education. MDRC.
70.
RutschowE.SepanikS.DeitchV.RaufmanJ.DukesD.MoussaA. (2019). Gaining ground: Findings from the Dana Center Mathematics Pathways Impact Study. MDRC.
71.
SchochetP. Z. (2008). Technical methods report: Guidelines for multiple testing in impact evaluations (NCEE 2008-4018). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
72.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2012). Do high-stakes placement exams predict college success? (CCRC working paper no. 41). Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
73.
Scott-ClaytonJ.SchuddeL. (2017). Performance requirements in need-based aid: What roles do they serve, and do they work? [Research brief]. Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment, Teachers College, Columbia University.
74.
ScrivenerS.GuptaH.WeissM. J.CohenB.CormierM. S.BrathwaiteJ. (2018). Becoming college-ready: Early findings from a CUNY Start evaluation. MDRC.
75.
ScrivenerS.WeissM. J.SommoC. (2012). What can a multifaceted program do for community college students? Early results from an evaluation of Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) for developmental education students. MDRC.
76.
SommoC.BoyntonM.ColladoH.DiamondJ.GardenhireA.RatledgeA.RuddT.WeissM. J. (2014). Mapping success: Performance-based scholarships, student services, and developmental math at Hillsborough Community College. MDRC.
77.
SteinM. K.SmithM. S.HenningsenM. A.SilverE. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. Teachers College Press.
78.
StiglerJ. W.HiebertJ. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.
79.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Building on foundations for success: Guidelines for improving adult mathematics instruction. Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
ValentineJ. C.KonstantopoulosS.Goldrick-RabS. (2017). What happens to students placed into developmental education? A meta-analysis of regression discontinuity studies. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 806–833.
84.
VisherM. G.WathingtonH.Richburg-HayesL.SchneiderE. (2008). The learning communities demonstration: Rationale, sites and research design. National Center for Postsecondary Research.
85.
VisherM. G.WeissM. J.WeissmanE.RuddT.WathingtonH. D. (2012). The effects of learning communities for students in developmental education. MDRC.
86.
WeissM. J.BloomH. S.BrockT. (2014). A conceptual framework for studying the sources of variation in program effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(3), 778–808.
87.
WeissM. J.BloomH. S.Verbitsky-SavitzN.GuptaH.VigilA. E.CullinanD. N. (2017). How much do the effects of education and training programs vary across sites? Evidence from past multisite randomized trials. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(4), 843–876.
88.
WeissM. J.BrockT.SommoC.RuddT.TurnerM. C. (2011). Serving community college students on probation: Four-year findings from Chaffey College’s Opening Doors Program. MDRC’s.
89.
WeissM. J.RatledgeA.SommoC.GuptaH. (2019). Supporting community college students from start to degree completion: Long-term evidence from a randomized trial of CUNY’s ASAP. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(3), 253–297.
90.
WeissM. J.VisherM.WeissmanE.WathingtonH. (2015). The impact of learning communities for students in developmental education: A synthesis of findings from randomized trials at six community colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 520–541.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
