We use regression discontinuity design to examine the impact of placing into developmental math on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) participation in community colleges and whether these relationships differ for underrepresented racially minoritized (URM), women, STEM-oriented, and STEM-aspiring students. Results show that lower math placement was a deterrent to both math progression and STEM participation, especially for those at the margin of placement in transfer-level math. Subgroup analyses suggest that lower math placement may have supported women, and to a lesser extent URM students, in completing transferable STEM credits. For STEM-oriented students, we find suggestive evidence that lower placement deterred them from accumulating transferable credits. We discuss how community colleges can support these students and bolster the community college STEM pathway.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
3.
AttewellP.HeilS.ReiselL. (2012). What is academic momentum? And does it matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 27–44.
4.
AttewellP.LavinD.DominaT.LaveyT. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 886–924.
5.
BahrP. R.JacksonG.McNaughtanJ.OsterM.GrossJ. (2017). Unrealized potential: Community college pathways to STEM baccalaureate degrees. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 430–478.
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
7.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 57(1), 289–300.
8.
Ben-ZeevA.PaluyY.MillessK.GoldsteinE.WallaceL.Márquez-MagañaL.. . . EstradaM. (2017). “Speaking Truth” protects underrepresented minorities’ intellectual performance and safety in STEM. Education Sciences, 7(2), 65.
9.
BettingerE.LongB. T. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work?The Journal of Human Resources, 44, 736–771.
10.
BoatmanA.LongB. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58.
11.
BritnerS. L.PajaresF. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.
12.
BrykA. S.TreismanU. (2010). Make math a gateway, not a gatekeeper. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(32), B19–B20.
13.
CalonicoS.CattaneoM. D.FarrellM.TitiunikR. (2017). rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs. The Stata Journal, 17(2), 372–404.
14.
CalonicoS.CattaneoM. D.TitiunikR. (2014). Robust data-driven inference in the regression-discontinuity design. The Stata Journal, 14(4), 909–946.
15.
CastlemanB. L.LongB. T.MabelZ. (2017). Can financial aid help to address the growing need for STEM education? The effects of need-based grants on the completion of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math courses and degrees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(1), 136–166.
16.
CattaneoM. D.JanssonM.MaX. (2018). Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity. The Stata Journal, 18(1), 234–261.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.MuschkinC.VigdorJ. L. (2015). Developmental education in North Carolina Community Colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 354–375.
19.
CrispG.NoraA.TaggartA. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942.
20.
DadgarM.TrimbleM. (2015). Labor market returns to sub-baccalaureate credentials: How much does a community college degree or certificate pay?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 399–418.
21.
EllisJ.FosdickB. K.RasmussenC. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLOS ONE, 11(7), Article e0157447.
22.
EvansB. J. (2017). SMART money: Do financial incentives encourage college students to study science?Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 342–368.
23.
FongK. E.MelguizoT. (2017). Utilizing additional measures of high school academic preparation to support students in their math self-assessment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(9), 566–592.
24.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717.
25.
GoodmanJ. (2019). The labor of division: Returns to compulsory high school math coursework. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(4), 1141–1182.
26.
GottfriedM. A.BozickR. (2016). Supporting the STEM pipeline: Linking applied STEM course-taking in high school to declaring a STEM major in college. Education Finance and Policy, 11(2), 177–202.
27.
HodaraM.XuD. (2016). Does developmental education improve labor market outcomes?American Educational Research Journal, 53(3), 781–813.
28.
ImbensG. W.KalyanaramanK. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 933–959.
29.
ImbensG. W.LemieuxT. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.
30.
LeeD. S. (2009). Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(3), 1071–1102.
31.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355.
32.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
33.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.SchmidtJ.BrennerB.LyonsH.TreistmanD. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 458–465.
34.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BieschkeK. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424–430.
35.
LesikS. A. (2006). Applying the regression-discontinuity design to infer causality with non-random assignment. The Review of Higher Education, 30(1), 1–19.
36.
LogueA. W.DouglasD.Watanabe-RoseM. (2019). Corequisite mathematics remediation: Results over time and in different contexts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719848777
37.
MartorellP.McFarlinI. (2011). Help or hindrance? The effects of college remediation on academic and labor market outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 436–454.
38.
MartorellP.McFarlinI.XueY. (2015). Does failing a placement exam discourage underprepared students from going to college?Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 46–80.
39.
McCraryJ. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.
40.
MelguizoT.BosJ. M.NgoF.MillsN.PratherG. (2016). Using a regression discontinuity design to estimate the impact of placement decisions in developmental math. Research in Higher Education, 57(2), 123–151.
41.
MelguizoT.KosiewiczH.PratherG.BosJ. (2014). How are community college students assessed and placed in developmental math? Grounding our understanding in reality. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 691–722.
42.
MelguizoT.NgoF. (2020). Mis/alignment between high school and community college standards. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 130–133.
National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 (Special Report NSF 17-310). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
46.
NgoF.KwonW. (2015). Using multiple measures to make math placement decisions: Implications for access and success in community colleges. Research in Higher Education, 56(5), 442–470.
47.
ParkE. S.NgoF.MelguizoT. (2020). The role of math misalignment in the community college STEM pathway. Research in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09602-y
48.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
49.
RincónB. E.George-JacksonC. E. (2016). Examining department climate for women in engineering: The role of STEM interventions. Journal of College Student Development, 57(6), 742–747.
50.
RodriguezR.JohnsonH.MejiaM.BrooksB. (2017). Reforming math pathways at California’s community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California.
51.
SawG.ChangC. N.ChanH. Y. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–531.
52.
SaxL. J.KannyM. A.Riggers-PiehlT. A.WhangH.PaulsonL. N. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56, 813–842.
53.
Scott-ClaytonJ.RodriguezO. (2015). Develop-ment, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation. Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 4–45.
54.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
55.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
56.
StinebricknerR.StinebricknerT. R. (2014). A major in science? Initial beliefs and final outcomes for college major and dropout. Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 426–472.
57.
StinebricknerT.StinebricknerR. (2012). Learning about academic ability and the college dropout decision. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(4), 707–748.
58.
ValentineJ. C.KonstantopoulosS.Goldrick-RabS. (2017). What happens to students placed into developmental education? A meta-analysis of regression discontinuity studies. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 806–833.
59.
WaltonG. M.LogelC.PeachJ. M.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in Engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468–485.
60.
WangX. (2013a). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 664–692.
61.
WangX. (2013b). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121.
62.
WangX. (2015). Pathway to a baccalaureate in STEM fields: Are community colleges a viable route and does early STEM momentum matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 376–393.
63.
WangX. (2017). Toward a holistic theoretical model of momentum for community college student success. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 259–308). Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
